Jump to content

Sevco Thread


Recommended Posts


For anyone as sad, obsessed and interested as I the figures apparently were 55m of debt of which Craig Whytes VAT and PAYE was £14m meaning HMRC held the power hand re the CVA.

 

The £55m considered within the CVA excludes the wee tax case and big tax case Which between them were estimated at a tax omission of between £30m and £60m, the difference being the net and gross assessment being discussed today. On top of that is the penalties which is a percentage (65% I think) of the tax omission, so of the £30m or the £60m depending who’s version you take.

 

The KEY takeaway is this. It doesn’t matter. The assessment was pursued because they denied it existed. The assessment whether the smaller or the larger was more than enough to sink them. Permanently.

 

Cunts.

Link to comment

Does this mean I was right?

I don't see why it would.

 

Changes to the final tax bill don't change the facts the Huns broke the rules of football, lied on the registration documents for dozens of their players and secretly paid them through hidden means to avoid scrutiny from the SFA and their rivals as well as the tax man.

 

Oh and used their employees to positions within the SFA to ensure no one ever asked questions or investigated what was happening.

Link to comment

They didn't die due to an administrative error. That's shite.

 

The big tax case bill was only part of their debt. They had tens of millions of debt outside that.

At the end of it all they cannot blame anyone else for their death other than the people who owned and ran their club.

 

Murray and his chronies gambled with huge debts, illegal tax avoidance schemes and all sorts of dodgy accounting practices.

 

That's what caught up with them in the end. Bills from HRMC are just a result of the many dubious and high risk things they did to gain advantage over the rest of us.

 

Fuck em.

Link to comment

Does the oldco have any assets at all? Surely they will never see a penny? All the assets were transferred to the new club. That’s the thing I hate about the whole thing. New club don’t take any responsibility for the old clubs debts but they claim there trophies. It’s surely 1 or the other?

 

Same.  It's pretty simple surely?

 

If they are the same club, they keep their history - but they should also have to settle their debts.

Link to comment

Same.  It's pretty simple surely?

 

If they are the same club, they keep their history - but they should also have to settle their debts.

From an EBT expert: 

 

Could Oldco Rangers and Newco Rangers join forces if it was beneficial to club?

Hard to see how that could be done in law, they are two separate entities.

Link to comment

Does the oldco have any assets at all? Surely they will never see a penny? All the assets were transferred to the new club. That’s the thing I hate about the whole thing. New club don’t take any responsibility for the old clubs debts but they claim there trophies. It’s surely 1 or the other?

So, several things at play here.

 

1/. Whyte very conveniently and at huge risk to himself paid off the bank at the start. Ordinarily that ensures the holder of the floating charge (now Whyte) had control. Otherwise Lloyd’s potentially could just have sold off the stadium.

 

2/. Whyte then performed his own conjuring trick and used Rangers own (borrowed) money to fund the bank payoff - the infamous ticketus deal.

 

3/. Green then fucks over Whyte with the so called switcheroo. So basically Whyte is sitting in his get away car ref plate Sevco5088. Green with his bag of swag (stadium, training fac, cash) runs straight past his car and jumps into another reg plate Sevco Scotland and fucks off to the third division with his booty.

 

4/. To answer your question liquidators should them have turned up at “Rangers” to find a list of creditors, none of them secured except Whyte And zero assets. However at this late point the transaction at 2 is looked at and the lawyers involved Collier Bristow decide they’ve fucked up releasing the money to Whyte and their insurers pay out an equivalent sum of ~£26m to Oldco. Bear in mind the source of those funds Ticketus are on the list with their £26m owed to them.

 

 

That was always the thing that complicated the issue. Oedinarily the liquidators turn up to a glistening skeleton. Here they opened the door to a pile of Cash THAT WAS NEVER RANGERS’.

 

Now bear in mind the costs of liquidation come out of that pile before any payment to genuine creditors. What’s that you say? They’ve been appealing points of order with HMRC? Yeah. I’ll bet they have. Their bill currently stands at £5m. Their sub contracted lawyers fees etc stand at £15m.

 

Clever cunts.

 

Shame.

Link to comment
Guest the shepherd

From an EBT expert:

 

Could Oldco Rangers and Newco Rangers join forces if it was beneficial to club?

Hard to see how that could be done in law, they are two separate entities.

That's comparative to Ted Bundy's acts of necrophilia; Bundy being the new (existing), with the dead body being the old.

Link to comment

So basically in a nutshell the Times "journalist" who wrote the piece yesterday is clearly a raving hun who according to HMRC is talking shite.

 

 Yes but (if I'm reading into this correctly) with the added bonus that with any ensuing investigation (and sevco are keeping their gobs well shut so far) it should come out that sevco and oldco are indeed 2 separate entitities. With no continued history. 

 

And the orc hordes who are clamouring for public inquiries etc are to be absolutely encouraged by the supporters of every other club to ensure they get what they want (and what's coming  :hysterical: )

Link to comment

So basically in a nutshell the Times "journalist" who wrote the piece yesterday is clearly a raving hun who according to HMRC is talking shite.

 

Hun journalist in a spikin' shite story... who'd have thunk it. He prob overheard wee Tam in the Louden Tavern, telling his mate he kens a boy who works for the HMRC. We all know, the HMRC were never going to make such a monumental fuck up, nor were the hun accountants. I would love to hear the opinion of an honest hun, but 1. I cant find one and 2. I wouldnt be able to hear fuck all over the clutching of straws....

 

Too many huns buy into this type of shit, but it makes it all the more funnier. 

Link to comment

So basically in a nutshell the Times "journalist" who wrote the piece yesterday is clearly a raving hun who according to HMRC is talking shite.

 

Yeah it seems like maybe HMRC just don't want to waste time and money fighting legal action that if they win, they still get nothing as the old Rangers really have feck all assets left to fight over.

 

So when people look at the bill reducing and try to re-write history it's all based on a false premise - if the huns were still going and fighting this case then HRMC would continue to take court action to defend the tax demands.

 

Mair pish from rabid huns basically.

 

The cunts are everywhere, thats the problem.

Link to comment

 Yes but (if I'm reading into this correctly) with the added bonus that with any ensuing investigation (and sevco are keeping their gobs well shut so far) it should come out that sevco and oldco are indeed 2 separate entitities. With no continued history. 

 

And the orc hordes who are clamouring for public inquiries etc are to be absolutely encouraged by the supporters of every other club to ensure they get what they want (and what's coming  :hysterical: )

 

Well I did hear Douglas Fraser on the beeb the other day talking about the old club and the new club.

 

Which was pretty clear actually for the beeb and no doubt they got loads of complaints and Douglas will probably get death threats and all sorts.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...