G31DON Posted Sunday at 11:01 PM Share Posted Sunday at 11:01 PM Scottish cup final will be a sea of Irish tricolour and union flags. Mutants Link to comment
Roberto Posted Monday at 03:41 AM Share Posted Monday at 03:41 AM 4 hours ago, G31DON said: Scottish cup final will be a sea of Irish tricolour and union flags. Mutants Palestine vs Israel. 2 Link to comment
WesthillWanderersFC Posted Monday at 05:50 AM Share Posted Monday at 05:50 AM 6 hours ago, G31DON said: Scottish cup final will be a sea of Irish tricolour and union flags. Mutants A stray missile strike please. 50,000 less bigots in the world… AND, the SFA in attendance. Win-win 2 Link to comment
Big Hat Logan Posted Monday at 09:45 AM Share Posted Monday at 09:45 AM 6 hours ago, Roberto said: Palestine vs Israel. Was just thinking this. Can’t wait for them to embarrass everyone with their antics. Link to comment
englishred Posted Monday at 12:24 PM Share Posted Monday at 12:24 PM 14 hours ago, Millertime said: Would you rather hearts won it than one of those 2? I wouldn't like it but yes. I think anything that breaks the status quo has to be good. Link to comment
Dons21 Posted Monday at 12:32 PM Share Posted Monday at 12:32 PM Maybe hearts can add this to their list of honours. Never beaten Rangers at Hampden in their illustrious history. Big club, my arse. Disgraceful stat. 1 Link to comment
Dynamo Posted Monday at 01:09 PM Share Posted Monday at 01:09 PM Hearts were a massive disappointment yesterday. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted Monday at 01:15 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 01:15 PM 15 hours ago, DeltaRay1903 said: Exactly. I would view with great suspicion any Aberdeen fan who would choose to watch the final. I won’t even be watching a game with Aberdeen v any of those cunts now (other than replays if we actually win) cos am just sick to the back teeth of the bias shown to them. Just fkn angers me too much. The cunts have worn me down Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted Monday at 01:17 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 01:17 PM 7 minutes ago, Dynamo said: Hearts were a massive disappointment yesterday. Reckon Naismith & Shankland earned themselves a cheeky wee bonus myself Link to comment
Wester Hailes Skins Posted Monday at 01:25 PM Share Posted Monday at 01:25 PM 13 minutes ago, Dynamo said: Hearts were a massive disappointment yesterday. There's no denying that the spirit shown by Aberdeen and Coventry was totally absent by Hearts. Our fans saw that, clearly. No argument. 1 2 Link to comment
RabidGiraffe Posted Monday at 01:45 PM Share Posted Monday at 01:45 PM 1 hour ago, englishred said: I wouldn't like it but yes. I think anything that breaks the status quo has to be good. This status quo thing is an interesting narrative. In the last 10 years there have been zero Scottish cup finals involving both the ugly twins. At least one of them (usually the huns) gets beaten at some point, but most times one of them will make it to the final. Winners - Celtic (5), St. j (2), Hibs (1), ICT (1). Rangers (1) Similar for the League Cup. Only 2 finals involving the uglies in 10 years. Winners - Celtic (7), Ross County (1), St. J (1), Aberdeen (1) The media and the sponsors would have you believe Blue v Green finals happen all the time and that's what the fans want, but it's nonsense. In that time Celtic have won 9 out of the 10 league titles. Only one or two of them have been a "contest". The media project the narrative that the rest of us should be grateful the ugly twins let us share their football, that the whole of Scottish football is an even tussle between those two for the three trophies available and the rest of us are also-rans, whereas the reality is that since they got caught for their financial cheating, the blue half of Glasgow are just as fucked as the rest of us, or at best marginally more likely to win something on the rare occasions their green sibling stumbles. If the media where much more honest about that and the blue cunts humble enough to admit it (which they aren't and never will be), we'd be much more likely to get some form of change in our game that levels the playing field for everyone. 3 Link to comment
Millertime Posted Monday at 03:40 PM Share Posted Monday at 03:40 PM 3 hours ago, englishred said: I wouldn't like it but yes. I think anything that breaks the status quo has to be good. Wow No way Link to comment
shut up meg Posted Monday at 06:06 PM Share Posted Monday at 06:06 PM 4 hours ago, RabidGiraffe said: This status quo thing is an interesting narrative. In the last 10 years there have been zero Scottish cup finals involving both the ugly twins. At least one of them (usually the huns) gets beaten at some point, but most times one of them will make it to the final. Winners - Celtic (5), St. j (2), Hibs (1), ICT (1). Rangers (1) Similar for the League Cup. Only 2 finals involving the uglies in 10 years. Winners - Celtic (7), Ross County (1), St. J (1), Aberdeen (1) The media and the sponsors would have you believe Blue v Green finals happen all the time and that's what the fans want, but it's nonsense. In that time Celtic have won 9 out of the 10 league titles. Only one or two of them have been a "contest". The media project the narrative that the rest of us should be grateful the ugly twins let us share their football, that the whole of Scottish football is an even tussle between those two for the three trophies available and the rest of us are also-rans, whereas the reality is that since they got caught for their financial cheating, the blue half of Glasgow are just as fucked as the rest of us, or at best marginally more likely to win something on the rare occasions their green sibling stumbles. If the media where much more honest about that and the blue cunts humble enough to admit it (which they aren't and never will be), we'd be much more likely to get some form of change in our game that levels the playing field for everyone. So going by the above, Celtic have won 21 out of the last 30 trophies and MT doesn't want to break the status quo. It's easy to see that he was born, brought up and still lives in the Glasgow goldfish bowl. Link to comment
Jigsaw666 Posted Monday at 06:40 PM Share Posted Monday at 06:40 PM 4 hours ago, RabidGiraffe said: This status quo thing is an interesting narrative. In the last 10 years there have been zero Scottish cup finals involving both the ugly twins. At least one of them (usually the huns) gets beaten at some point, but most times one of them will make it to the final. Winners - Celtic (5), St. j (2), Hibs (1), ICT (1). Rangers (1) Similar for the League Cup. Only 2 finals involving the uglies in 10 years. Winners - Celtic (7), Ross County (1), St. J (1), Aberdeen (1) The media and the sponsors would have you believe Blue v Green finals happen all the time and that's what the fans want, but it's nonsense. In that time Celtic have won 9 out of the 10 league titles. Only one or two of them have been a "contest". The media project the narrative that the rest of us should be grateful the ugly twins let us share their football, that the whole of Scottish football is an even tussle between those two for the three trophies available and the rest of us are also-rans, whereas the reality is that since they got caught for their financial cheating, the blue half of Glasgow are just as fucked as the rest of us, or at best marginally more likely to win something on the rare occasions their green sibling stumbles. If the media where much more honest about that and the blue cunts humble enough to admit it (which they aren't and never will be), we'd be much more likely to get some form of change in our game that levels the playing field for everyone. I thought the stat was that this is the first final between the two since 2002. They've met something like five times (including this one) in the final since 1980. Not that many really. 1 Link to comment
Hoofball Posted Monday at 06:41 PM Share Posted Monday at 06:41 PM 5 hours ago, Dynamo said: Hearts were a massive disappointment yesterday. Hearts are a massive disappointment but fortunately for them Aberdeen are comically bad and have allowed them to canter off with third. Link to comment
RabidGiraffe Posted Monday at 06:48 PM Share Posted Monday at 06:48 PM 5 minutes ago, Jigsaw666 said: I thought the stat was that this is the first final between the two since 2002. They've met something like five times (including this one) in the final since 1980. Not that many really. I thought about starting from the beginning of the century but I took my data from the beginning of the Sevco era instead, seeing as it's a new club and all. 1 Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted Monday at 07:09 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 07:09 PM 29 minutes ago, Jigsaw666 said: I thought the stat was that this is the first final between the two since 2002. They've met something like five times (including this one) in the final since 1980. Not that many really. Aye SC but nae LC Link to comment
Dynamo Posted Monday at 07:20 PM Share Posted Monday at 07:20 PM 38 minutes ago, Hoofball said: Hearts are a massive disappointment but fortunately for them Aberdeen are comically bad and have allowed them to canter off with third. That's just how it goes sometimes. We'll be back. Link to comment
DeltaRay1903 Posted Monday at 07:27 PM Share Posted Monday at 07:27 PM 45 minutes ago, Hoofball said: Hearts are a massive disappointment but fortunately for them Aberdeen are comically bad and have allowed them to canter off with third. It's annoying. We are the better side but they are the more consistent. 1 Link to comment
super_al Posted Monday at 08:10 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:10 PM 40 minutes ago, DeltaRay1903 said: It's annoying. We are the better side but they are the more consistent. The semi finals summed up the season for both Aberdeen and Hearts. We have raised our game against relatively good opponents this season but have struggled against the so called smaller clubs. Hearts have been the exact opposite. 1 Link to comment
Hoofball Posted Monday at 08:18 PM Share Posted Monday at 08:18 PM 57 minutes ago, Dynamo said: That's just how it goes sometimes. We'll be back. I know it’s a cycle, we’ll be back and they’ll be relegated Link to comment
Ohjimmyjimmy Posted Monday at 09:26 PM Share Posted Monday at 09:26 PM 7 hours ago, Wester Hailes Skins said: There's no denying that the spirit shown by Aberdeen and Coventry was totally absent by Hearts. Our fans saw that, clearly. No argument. Fair enough. Much similar to how our club has been absent most of this season against everyone else. Performances against the Huns 3-2 and Saturday’s cup exit don’t make up for a season of disappointment. Link to comment
Wester Hailes Skins Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 15 hours ago, super_al said: The semi finals summed up the season for both Aberdeen and Hearts. We have raised our game against relatively good opponents this season but have struggled against the so called smaller clubs. Hearts have been the exact opposite. Our record against Celtic is decent. It's just The Rangers. Which I'm sure will lead to accusations of lying down. But it's led to some speculation. The two are still lumped as, the OF. Making it seem like the two teams are similar too. In fact whilst both a lot better than everyone else, The Rangers have a more physical set of players than Celtic. Who tend to pass you off the park. We struggle with the more physical side of The Rangers. We need a harder and more physical core. As well as generally a better team. Link to comment
Belabedlam Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago 32 minutes ago, Wester Hailes Skins said: Our record against Celtic is decent. It's just The Rangers. Which I'm sure will lead to accusations of lying down. But it's led to some speculation. The two are still lumped as, the OF. Making it seem like the two teams are similar too. In fact whilst both a lot better than everyone else, The Rangers have a more physical set of players than Celtic. Who tend to pass you off the park. We struggle with the more physical side of The Rangers. We need a harder and more physical core. As well as generally a better team. Being physical are exactly what Hearts are known for. You've signed a lot of physical bruiser and dirty cheating types from the Huns over the years i.e Andy Halliday, Kyle Lafferty, Willie Johnstone. Difference is, you DO lie down to Rangers. You bottle it against them every time. At least we give Celtic a game - most defeats are by the odd goal, minus the occasional pumping. Hearts only ever seem to get pumped by at least 2 goals. Link to comment
super_al Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, Wester Hailes Skins said: Our record against Celtic is decent. It's just The Rangers. Which I'm sure will lead to accusations of lying down. But it's led to some speculation. The two are still lumped as, the OF. Making it seem like the two teams are similar too. In fact whilst both a lot better than everyone else, The Rangers have a more physical set of players than Celtic. Who tend to pass you off the park. We struggle with the more physical side of The Rangers. We need a harder and more physical core. As well as generally a better team. However your record against the likes of Killie, St Mirren, Dundee etc... has been strong. Unless its a cup or European game don't count on us turning up. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted 19 hours ago Author Share Posted 19 hours ago St Johnstone must be favourites for play off spot. Haven’t won since they beat County 1-0 on 3rd feb. Only other point picked up since was a draw v Livi Link to comment
styrofoamplates Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, fine-n-dandy said: St Johnstone must be favourites for play off spot. Haven’t won since they beat County 1-0 on 3rd feb. Only other point picked up since was a draw v Livi They beat us 2-0 on the 28th of Feb and beat Hibs 2-1 on the 6th of April. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted 19 hours ago Author Share Posted 19 hours ago 3 minutes ago, styrofoamplates said: They beat us 2-0 on the 28th of Feb and beat Hibs 2-1 on the 6th of April. Oops 😬 yeah forget that. They’ll beat Hibs at home next as well. We’re still in the shite. I was clutching Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now