Scottish Independence Referendum 2

[Jocky Balboa]

How can he give evidence when the entire process is set up to exclude key evidence and thus protect the insidious behaviour of those who set him up? Regardless of which side of the constitutional question we may be on, this shyte is making Scotland look like a porridge and bananas republic. 

Hopefully when this is done the Poundshop Ceaucescus will be out on their arse. They can take their faeces frollicker, transcult nutjobs with them.

[For Fecks Sake]

35 minutes ago, Beachend Bootboy said:

Corruption.

For who though? Thought Salmond would have relished the opportunity to appear before the committee.

[Beachend Bootboy]

1 minute ago, For Fecks Sake said:

For who though? Thought Salmond would have relished the opportunity to appear before the committee.

The whole fuckin' thing stinks o' shite.  If you or I carried on like that we'd be in the pokey.

[tutankamun]

41 minutes ago, For Fecks Sake said:

For who though? Thought Salmond would have relished the opportunity to appear before the committee.

Only if he’s allowed to give his entire evidence and not an edited version 

[Ten Caat]

8 minutes ago, tutankamun said:

Only if he’s allowed to give his entire evidence and not an edited version 

I thought the redacted version was only for the press. The committee will have full access to the whole document so no reason for him not to appear.

He's playing Sturgeon, Holyrood and the press like violins

[tutankamun]

16 minutes ago, Ten Caat said:

I thought the redacted version was only for the press. The committee will have full access to the whole document so no reason for him not to appear.

He's playing Sturgeon, Holyrood and the press like violins

“After a legal clarification, the committee referred the matter to the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body which concluded that "on balance" it would be possible for the document to be published.

The submission was finally published on Monday evening, but it prompted the Crown Office to raise "grave concerns".
The parliament later removed one of the documents and republished the submission in another form, which in turn led to Mr Salmond announcing he could not appear at the evidence session scheduled for Wednesday.”

 

 

[tutankamun]

Jiggery-pokery ?

[Ohjimmyjimmy]

Salmond lashing out at all and sundry, throwing windmills.

 

The fat cunt knows he’s finished and trying to inflict as much damage as possible as he goes down in flames.

A creepy bastard right enough.

[Beachend Bootboy]

12 hours ago, caledonia said:

Joe pike has Beachend bootboy up his.

Yeah, and my boot up yours.  Fud.

Hail the Union. 

[alscotoz]

11 hours ago, Bad_Mobby said:

 Blue or green milk? 

White, perhaps?

[Parklife]

1 hour ago, Ohjimmyjimmy said:

 

The fat cunt knows he’s finished and trying to inflict as much damage as possible as he goes down in flames.

That's for sure. 

I think he may well have right to feel aggrieved but I'd guess that the grand conspiracy from the FM to set him up for rape that all the weirdos on here are hoping for will be well wide of the mark. 

[Simply Red]

1 hour ago, Beachend Bootboy said:

 

Hail the Union. 

WATP

FTP

[Beachend Bootboy]

1 minute ago, Simply Red said:

WATP

FTP

With part of that I concur,  with part I dinna'.

[Simply Red]

Just now, Beachend Bootboy said:

With part of that I concur,  with part I dinna'.

Nae doot. 

Hun.

[Parklife]

Your posting is so similar, that I wouldn't actually be surprised if you were Dayts. 

Must be something to do with blows to the head. 

[Clydeside_Sheep]

It is clear that Sturgeon is deploying a corrupt legal system at every turn to block Salmond's evidence. 

Regardless of what you think of him, he is correct that there is no healthy separation between the SNP, Scottish Government, Crown Office, Police Scotland, civic Scotland, Scottish media etc.  They are all essentially tentacles of Sturgeon. 

On Monday she said Salmond had produced "no evidence" for his claims, yet her government had then made 58 separate interventions to block or delay the SNP-led inquiry accessing information.

When the Inquiry finally published Salmond's submission - only thanks to the Spectator magazine, which had already published it, going to court to show publishing was allowed - Sturgeon instigated yet another intervention to spoil the use of the documents.

This is a real disgrace and an embarrassment. Sturgeon expects to get away with it, as she knows her "low information" supporters will back her anyway.  Many are probably completely unaware of any of these proceedings, over years, and the ones who are simply parrot her own propaganda.  You can easily identify them as the tweets and soundbites are identical.

Salmond just wants to come and give his evidence without interference.  That is not unreasonable and, if he is allowed to do so, then the sooner the matter will end.

The salutary lesson from all this is to note what a corrupt tin-pot nation Independent Scotland would be, due to it being so politically immature and rotten to the core.

So far, Scotland has received about £12 billion extra UK money to help with coronavirus,  on top of benefiting from outstanding UK vaccine performance.  Yet still corrupt separatists remain popular, people who have answers for nothing, couldn't run a menage and only care about power. 

The general lack of BBC news scrutiny on this, especially at UK level, is astonishing.   Meanwhile BBC Scotland could be called BBC Sturgeon.

[Beachend Bootboy]

5 minutes ago, Clydeside_Sheep said:

It is clear that Sturgeon is deploying a corrupt legal system at every turn to block Salmond's evidence. 

Regardless of what you think of him, he is correct that there is no healthy separation between the SNP, Scottish Government, Crown Office, Police Scotland, civic Scotland, Scottish media etc.  They are all essentially tentacles of Sturgeon. 

On Monday she said Salmond had produced "no evidence" for his claims, yet her government had then made 58 separate interventions to block or delay the SNP-led inquiry accessing information.

When the Inquiry finally published Salmond's submission - only thanks to the Spectator magazine, which had already published it, going to court to show publishing was allowed - Sturgeon instigated yet another intervention to spoil the use of the documents.

This is a real disgrace and an embarrassment. Sturgeon expects to get away with it, as she knows her "low information" supporters will back her anyway.  Many are probably completely unaware of any of these proceedings, over years, and the ones who are simply parrot her own propaganda.  You can easily identify them as the tweets and soundbites are identical.

Salmond just wants to come and give his evidence without interference.  That is not unreasonable and, if he is allowed to do so, then the sooner the matter will end.

The salutary lesson from all this is to note what a corrupt tin-pot nation Independent Scotland would be, due to it being so politically immature and rotten to the core.

So far, Scotland has received about £12 billion extra UK money to help with coronavirus,  on top of benefiting from outstanding UK vaccine performance.  Yet still corrupt separatists remain popular, people who have answers for nothing, couldn't run a menage and only care about power. 

The general lack of BBC news scrutiny on this, especially at UK level, is astonishing.   Meanwhile BBC Scotland could be called BBC Sturgeon.

Brilliant post and I agree 100%.  Well said that man.

[Poodler]

2 hours ago, Parklife said:

That's for sure. 

I think he may well have right to feel aggrieved but I'd guess that the grand conspiracy from the FM to set him up for rape that all the weirdos on here are hoping for will be well wide of the mark. 

Do you think she's guilty of anything in this case? 

[Parklife]

4 minutes ago, Poodler said:

Do you think she's guilty of anything in this case? 

Is breaking the ministerial code a crime? It looks like she may have done that. 

Ive not seen any solid evidence of anything more than that. I've not read all the details of & submissions to the inquiry though. 

[Studebaker-90]

The suggestion is that breaking said code will make it hard for her to do anything but resign. 

[eddiec]

even if she did she could get some tips from Priti Patel on how to do it and still not have to resign or even Hancock on how to break the law and thereby the code and still refuse to resign.

[Henry]

[Parklife]

16 minutes ago, Studebaker-90 said:

The suggestion is that breaking said code will make it hard for her to do anything but resign. 

Suggestion from who? 

[Ten Caat]

19 minutes ago, Studebaker-90 said:

The suggestion is that breaking said code will make it hard for her to do anything but resign. 

I'd have thought impossible not to.

[Poodler]

19 minutes ago, Ten Caat said:

I'd have thought impossible not to.

Mind Covidiot mp who laughed in the face of the resignation pleas. That's died a death, she's safe in her job again 

 

ride the storm. They've intentionally caused widespread apathy amongst society so that the initial rage is never followed up. 
 

perhaps another Jo Cox may waken them up 

[Studebaker-90]

22 minutes ago, Parklife said:

Suggestion from who? 

Your ma 

[Parklife]

5 minutes ago, Studebaker-90 said:

Your ma 

Was a serious question  

My maw would want her to resign anyway. 

She's daft though. Old school Labour who'd forgotten what Labour are meant to stand for and hates the SNP more than the Tories. 

[For Fecks Sake]

Having read the Salmond evidence I did not see anything startling that I believe would get Sturgeon worried.  Have the impression there is a lot of smoke, mirrors and hints from Salmond but little in the way of hard evidence to back it up. 

However by going and redacting parts of the evidence only fuels the suspicions that there is more to this than meets the eye.

I reckon she will survive this and Salmond will fade away.

[Studebaker-90]

5 minutes ago, Parklife said:

Was a serious question  

My maw would want her to resign anyway. 

She's daft though. Old school Labour who'd forgotten what Labour are meant to stand for and hates the SNP more than the Tories. 

I don’t know much about it, just keep hearing it’s an absolute sin and couldn’t be survived if it was proven. Maybe a yarn spun by the media or her political foes. 

[Clydeside_Sheep]

This website is offering a reward of £25,000 cash to help a public spirited whistleblower to come forward and reveal a copy of Geoff Aberdein’s evidence to the Sturgeon Inquiry, which the Committee of Crooks has refused to publish, accept or consider, because it categorically proves that Sturgeon lied to Parliament.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/02/25000-reward-offered-for-copy-of-geoff-aberdein-testimony/