Scott Wright

[sooth_stander]

1 minute ago, RUL said:

Surely they'd just pay us 200k 

Aye but not to be confused with us paying them £150K

Its £200K PLUS McCrorie

[Ten Caat]

That's a fucking result and a half!

[SupportmeansSUPPORT]

8 minutes ago, sooth_stander said:

Sevco have paid us £550K for the player to move now, and we've given them £350K for McCrorie, is how I read it

No they have agreed a fee for Wright of 200k which is being taken off the fee for McCrorie. We are paying the balance of that now so Ross can play in the games against them from now onwards.

 

The article from Scott Burns reads -

 

 

Rangers have agreed a £200,000 deal for Scott Wright - with Ross McCrorie set to move permanently to Aberdeen today.

The Dons have paid the difference in the McCrorie deal to sign him now.

 

It means McCrorie can now play against Rangers in the league and if they are drawn together in the Scottish Cup.

Dons chairman Dave Cormack had turned down multiple bids from Rangers before he finally got his price this afternoon.

Aberdeen had McCrorie on loan with a clause to buy him permanently in the summer for £350,000

 

[Guest milne_afc]

Paying Huns £150k to let them have Wright btloi 

[Ten Caat]

1 minute ago, 4n4LprObE666 said:

Decent deal

If it were true

Sadly I'm going with the £200k for Wright plus we have paid the balance of £150k immediately to convert McCrorie to a full transfer,  now that I've read the story

[Andy_123]

That’s probably a better result than I thought we’d get.

We really are going to be a tough watch the rest of the season now though. 

[Ten Caat]

Tbf if anyone had offered £200k for Wright prior to this season starting, I would have hoped the club would have snapped their hands off. It's a good bit less than his theoretical value using the development fee formula but I think if we had demanded any more than what we've got, sevco would just have left him with us and we'd have got nothing for him at all at the end of the season.

[fine-n-dandy]

Player swap & a small fee isn’t a bad deal.

huns had us over a barrel for sure, they held all the cards but it’s really not a bad deal all things considered.

[fine-n-dandy]

Wonder if we have snuck in a sell on clause also, or if both sides have said no to sell on clause regarding both players.

 

More chance of us selling McCrorie for a decent fee that them selling Wright so hopefully no sell on deals.

 

Be very pissed off if they have kept a sell on claim McCrorie deal & not included one In Wright deal

[GDON21]

Also doing a transfer deal now might have allowed us to add on a sell on fee for further down the line. There is a sell on clause on McCrorie and hopefully we have been smart enough to add one in this deal. 

[GDON21]

7 minutes ago, Ten Caat said:

Tbf if anyone had offered £200k for Wright prior to this season starting, I would have hoped the club would have snapped their hands off. It's a good bit less than his theoretical value using the development fee formula but I think if we had demanded any more than what we've got, sevco would just have left him with us and we'd have got nothing for him at all at the end of the season.

How many times do you need to be told we were not due a development fee for him, as he would not be registered until after the season in which he turned 23. 

[Ten Caat]

5 minutes ago, GDON21 said:

How many times do you need to be told we were not due a development fee for him, as he would not be registered until after the season in which he turned 23. 

You are talking bullshit

The evidence is posted waaaaayyyy back in this thread you fucking dimwit

 

[GDON21]

4 minutes ago, Ten Caat said:

You are talking bullshit

The evidence is posted waaaaayyyy back in this thread you fucking dimwit

 

You're wrong. Ask the SFA.

[fine-n-dandy]

You’re both wrong. Ask Millermong 

[thurso]

Goodbye don’t let the door hit you on the way out. 
mccrorie will be worth more in a few years than you

[aberdeen1970]

Good deal under the circumstances. Always thought Wright would be away today. 

Also good to get the McCrorie deal done early as folk were panicking about that one being retracted when he was in good form before Xmas. Should give the boy a boost knowing how much we want him. 

If we get Kamberi and Hornby then we won't be looking too bad.  Could have been a lot worse!! 

[Ten Caat]

21 minutes ago, GDON21 said:

You're wrong. Ask the SFA.

https://fullcontactlaw.co.uk/2016/11/compensation-players-24-mystery/

Read that

It's FIFA/UEFA rules.........way above the SFA jurisdiction

[afc1903mad]

6 minutes ago, Ten Caat said:

https://fullcontactlaw.co.uk/2016/11/compensation-players-24-mystery/

Read that

 

Not sure how that applies in Scotland.

‘It was clarified that if a players moves before the end of the season a player turns 23, then compensation is due where an agreement is not made.

Wright signing for them post season would have meant no development compensation due to us

 

SPFL rule F3 https://spfl.co.uk/cms-content/images/shares/pdfs/Rules and Regulations SPFL 8_10_2018.pdf

Quote

Compensation
Compensation shall be payable to the former Club of a Player only where the Player concerned is Registered with his new Club at or before the end of the first Season in which the Player concerned reaches, will reach or shall have reached the age of 23.

 

[strachanmcgheegoal]

The 200k for Wright looks about right and the permanent purchase of McRorie can only be a good thing when he nets the winner against the cunts in the cup final.  Makes the Kamberi loan a bit of a wildcard though!

[Henry]

1 hour ago, Poodler said:

About 6 hours ago in the shower 

What was his name

[aberdeen1970]

3 minutes ago, Henry said:

What was his name

Ben Dover 

[thurso]

Fat ally was on sky sports news talking about Scott Wright moving to the rangers, says he likes the look of him as he’s fast has good feet and KNOWS WHERE THE GOALS IS. Take it he’s never seen him play to much then ?

[afc_blockhead]

2 minutes ago, thurso said:

Fat ally was on sky sports news talking about Scott Wright moving to the rangers, says he likes the look of him as he’s fast has good feet and KNOWS WHERE THE GOALS IS. Take it he’s never seen him play to much then ?

He knows where the goal is but he cant get near it with a fucking ball 99 times out of 100

[thurso]

8 minutes ago, afc_blockhead said:

He knows where the goal is but he cant get near it with a fucking ball 99 times out of 100

If he’s 1 on 1 with the keeper 99 times out of 100 the keeper saves it. The other time he puts it wide 

[GDON21]

1 hour ago, Ten Caat said:

https://fullcontactlaw.co.uk/2016/11/compensation-players-24-mystery/

Read that

It's FIFA/UEFA rules.........way above the SFA jurisdiction

You're completely wrong, Fifa rules state below(copied and pasted from Fifa website): check the Fifa rules and not some page written by an English journalist. 

Training compensation shall be paid to a player’s training club(s): (1) when a player signs his first contract as a professional, and (2) each time a professional is transferred until the end of the season of his 23rd birthday. The obligation to pay training compensation arises whether the transfer takes place during or at the end of the player’s contract. The provisions concerning training compensation are set out in Annexe 4 of these regulations. The principles of training compensation shall not apply to women’s football.

[Ten Caat]

12 minutes ago, GDON21 said:

You're completely wrong, Fifa rules state below(copied and pasted from Fifa website): check the Fifa rules and not some page written by an English journalist. 

Training compensation shall be paid to a player’s training club(s): (1) when a player signs his first contract as a professional, and (2) each time a professional is transferred until the end of the season of his 23rd birthday. The obligation to pay training compensation arises whether the transfer takes place during or at the end of the player’s contract. The provisions concerning training compensation are set out in Annexe 4 of these regulations. The principles of training compensation shall not apply to women’s football.

So you have just proved yourself wrong

the season has not ended yet...he turned 23 in August.......hence COMPENSATION IS PAYABLE!!!!

[dazzy_deff]

Training compensation above refers to percentage of transfer fees passed down, for example when Dyce boys club benefitted from Stuart Armstrong being sold is it not? 

The age for development fees was always 24 for moves within the same association.

[GDON21]

3 minutes ago, Ten Caat said:

So you have just proved yourself wrong

the season has not ended yet...he turned 23 in August.......hence COMPENSATION IS PAYABLE!!!!

Until the end of the season of his 23rd birthday, what do you not get? He turned 23 this season and compensation would only have been payable prior to the end of THIS season. If he didn't leave until after THIS season no compensation would of been due. A pre contract does not count towards signing before the end of THIS season, it goes by registration date at the new club, which would of been after THIS season. 

[Ten Caat]

But he fucking well didnt you dork

Show me where I said compo was payable after the end of the season?

Were you in remedial class at school?

[winchester83]

Looking for an accountant as my one has retired, lots of potential replacements on this topic.