Zeus Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Shows folk see different things.. I thought Ojo was rubbish Link to comment
Big Hat Logan Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Thats like saying you can compare a Lexus to a Jeep. They`re both cars, so... And there ends the similarity. They're different beasts, on different surfaces, offering different roles.So you can compare a Lexus to a jeep? Lol Link to comment
Big Hat Logan Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Well you can if you are prepared to consider how they would both produce if the swapped teams. wonder what both players actual goal conversion rate to attempts isalso wonder what there other stats are comparably, assists etc.Well yes, that’s how you compare things. Link to comment
shut up meg Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 You can't compare Morelos and Cosgrove. Morelos is backed up by a team that is attack-minded, and say what you want about SG he doesn't set his team up to only pressure in the teams own final third. Morelos is going to get multiple chances per game. Cosgrove scores goals despite his fucking manager. And pretty much his only clear cut chance of the entire game went in the net. If the link is correct, I think this backs up your post @@Kelt https://spfl.co.uk/stats-centre The huns have had 265 shots (17.66 per game) compared to 182 (10.11) for the Dons, the huns have had 118 (7.87 per game) on target compared to 77 (4.26 per game) for the Dons. The huns have more shots on goal because they are a team led by a manager that is set up to score goals.They have also played 3 less games than us. Link to comment
shut up meg Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Scoreline spot on. 20 out on the crowd. Decent effort that. There was never 12,300 there today, it looked like sub 10k from my seat. Link to comment
Ke1t Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 If the link is correct, I think this backs up your post @@Kelt https://spfl.co.uk/stats-centre The huns have had 265 shots (17.66 per game) compared to 182 (10.11) for the Dons, the huns have had 118 (7.87 per game) on target compared to 77 (4.26 per game) for the Dons. The huns have more shots on goal because they are a team led by a manager that is set up to score goals.They have also played 3 less games than us. I think the differences between the teams and the roles the strikers play is fairly obvious to those of us with a brain in our skull. The Rangers (formed 2012) are set up to create chances against the opposition. We are not. I'm actually surprised that The Rangers have only created 170% of the chances we have, though. Link to comment
shut up meg Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Well you can if you are prepared to consider how they would both produce if the swapped teams. wonder what both players actual goal conversion rate to attempts isalso wonder what there other stats are comparably, assists etc. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/scottish-premiership/top-scorers Morelos has had 44 attempts at goal, hit the target 28 times and scored 10 goals.Cosgrove has had 39 attempts at goal, hit the target 23 times and scored 10 goals. Cosgrove appears to have a better goals to attempts ratio however the penalties will skew that stats a fair bit although as Morelos and Tavernier has shown this season, getting the pens doesn't neccessarily mean that you will score them. Link to comment
YorkDon Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Only on a Dons forum could you have someone scoring his 19th of the season described as honking.We’d be relegation fodder without Cosgrove... 1 Link to comment
Andy_123 Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Today was a tough watch. Shite game and it was fucking baltic! We are such a boring and slow team. It just allows your teams like Hamilton to get numbers back behind the ball which makes the game difficult for us. We should be attacking fast and in numbers in games like this. We desperately need a Christie/Maddison type of player to provide a bit of spark going forward in January. Link to comment
Don Fonte Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Has anybody mentioned we need a Christie/Maddison type? Link to comment
Sheepo Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Today was a tough watch. Shite game and it was fucking baltic! We are such a boring and slow team. It just allows your teams like Hamilton to get numbers back behind the ball which makes the game difficult for us. We should be attacking fast and in numbers in games like this. We desperately need a Christie/Maddison type of player to provide a bit of spark going forward in January.Get one of that type and Mcinnes will play them on the wing, a bit like Wilson Today Link to comment
Fridge Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Only on a Dons forum could you have someone scoring his 19th of the season described as honking.We’d be relegation fodder without Cosgrove...Yep utterly fucking ridiculous. He is a goal poacher. Somehow he gets pelters for not running about like a headless chicken and ultimately offering fuck all. Can’t remember Shearer ( Duncan and Alan) Ruud van Nisterooy or however you spell it making lung bursting runs back to help the defence. Difference between being a forward and a poacher. His job is to be there at the right time and to ruthlessly finish. Link to comment
aberdeen1970 Posted December 14, 2019 Share Posted December 14, 2019 Christie and Maddison both had spells where they were benched here. And both had spells playing wide when they are both best behind the striker Link to comment
Sooper-hanz Posted December 15, 2019 Author Share Posted December 15, 2019 Christie Maddison sounds like a slut Cam Whore. (whatever that is) Link to comment
maryhilldon Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Has anybody mentioned we need a Christie/Maddison type?What, a creative type because we lack spark up front? Link to comment
Don Fonte Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 What, a creative type because we lack spark up front?No, a Christie/Maddison type. Idiot. Link to comment
maryhilldon Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Has a Dons player ever scored 20 goals by the turn of the year? Harper possibly? Cosgrove must have 40 goals in little more than a calendar year. Fuckin machine. Link to comment
Don Fonte Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Has a Dons player ever scored 20 goals by the turn of the year? Harper possibly? Cosgrove must have 40 goals in little more than a calendar year. Fuckin machine.Mackie. Link to comment
The Boofon Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Mackie. Haha fuck off. Link to comment
Betty Swallicks Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 How does accountancy help you with game intelligence? Mcinnes said he is better than stockley as he knows when to challenge and when not Well, he is losing it 167, actually As per, that's rubbish He missed 2 good headed chances Stick to hilarious stories about roasting pigs Cosgrove has zero assists in the league Next? OR, they can spend millions on players and thats why they can flat out bully their way to high scoring victories More rubbish You think Cosgrove is a poacher, in style? Lidiot MultiQuote millermong Link to comment
Betty Swallicks Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Terrible viewing again. We're fucked without Cosgrove. Link to comment
aberdeen1970 Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Christie Maddison sounds like a slut Cam Whore. Lesbian cam show with Maddison Christie (whatever that is) Link to comment
YorkDon Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Mackie.40 goals in 10 years maybe. Saw on Twitter I think that Mackie is in the top 50 Dons goal scorers of all time.Think he’s on 58,or was it 68?You can look at that in several ways... Link to comment
muttonhumper Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Fell asleep at half time, sounds like I got lucky I fell asleep for most of the first half.I'm assuming I did not miss much. There was never 12,300 there today, it looked like sub 10k from my seat. Attendance looked around 7,500-8,000. So over 4,000 ST holders obviously couldn't be arsed.For whatever reason... Link to comment
alscotoz Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 MultiQuote millermong Why did you have to do that? Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Anyway............a Christie/Maddison type. Any suggestions? Link to comment
1903Fitba Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Fucking hell that was pish. Agree on Hedges. DirtIs hedges not just what we knew already? Mr. Inconsistent? Looks good in some games and shite in others. Link to comment
Big Hat Logan Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 I think the differences between the teams and the roles the strikers play is fairly obvious to those of us with a brain in our skull. The Rangers (formed 2012) are set up to create chances against the opposition. We are not. I'm actually surprised that The Rangers have only created 170% of the chances we have, though.Nobody has said there’s not a difference between the teams. You can still compare players like for like without irrelevant motor vehicle analogies btw. Emoji overload incoming Link to comment
Zeus Posted December 15, 2019 Share Posted December 15, 2019 Is hedges not just what we knew already? Mr. Inconsistent? Looks good in some games and shite in others.Looks good against absolute dross like Chikura and Hearts Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now