Jump to content
Aberdeen FC confirm Jimmy Thelin appointment ✍️ ×

Coronavirus


Henry

Recommended Posts


Just now, manboobs109 said:

An old dear down my bit, mum of one of my mum's pals, taken into hospital today with Covid. Got her vaccine a just after new year. 

Not sure what to make of it tbh. 

Did she only get one shot, or has she had the booster inna? 

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, manboobs109 said:

An old dear down my bit, mum of one of my mum's pals, taken into hospital today with Covid. Got her vaccine a just after new year. 

Not sure what to make of it tbh. 

My Granda got moved into a care home just before Christmas. Quarantined for 2 weeks over the festive period (scandalous but never mind that’s a separate issue). Tested before he went in, tested after the quarantine then given the vaccine. Couple of weeks later tests positive despite nobody being allowed to visit and none of the other staff or patients returning a positive test.

Vaccine is useless and/or the test is a heap of shite. 
 

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, manboobs109 said:

Defo just one shot. No one around here has had a second one yet. 

According to what I'm reading, the efficacy of the single shot is only 30-40%.  She sounds like an auld lass, so I'm interested to hear if the initial shot helps her beat it... sounds morbid, but valuable information. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/19/single-covid-vaccine-dose-in-israel-less-effective-than-we-hoped

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Ke1t said:

According to what I'm reading, the efficacy of the single shot is only 30-40%.  She sounds like an auld lass, so I'm interested to hear if the initial shot helps her beat it... sounds morbid, but valuable information. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/19/single-covid-vaccine-dose-in-israel-less-effective-than-we-hoped

The way the NHS website describes it the second shot gives you longer protection not better

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-vaccination/coronavirus-vaccine/

The 1st dose of the COVID-19 vaccine should give you good protection from coronavirus. But you need to have the 2 doses of the vaccine to give you longer lasting protection.”

Possibly just poorly worded 

 

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, NEM said:

The way the NHS website describes it the second shot gives you longer protection not better

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/coronavirus-vaccination/coronavirus-vaccine/

The 1st dose of the COVID-19 vaccine should give you good protection from coronavirus. But you need to have the 2 doses of the vaccine to give you longer lasting protection.”

Possibly just poorly worded 

 

'Good protection' is vague to the point of being worthless information in isolation, maybe deliberately so on their part. 

The initial shot requires a booster to give 'full', long term immunity, and without the booster shot the initial shot is only good for 6 weeks or so. So the second shot does give you longer/'full' immunity. But 'good' in this case seems more to pertain to efficacy rather than longevity, since longevity is implied in the the second sentence. 

I'd take 'good' to mean a 'degree of immunity' rather than 'period of time' of immunity.

Say, 30-40%, if anyone considers that 'good'.

 

Link to comment
9 hours ago, manboobs109 said:

I don't get why they don't just do what the cunts who've made it recommend. Seems mental. 

Exactly. The large scale trials of the Pfizer vaccine have all been done on the basis of vaccine doses 3 weeks apart. That's what all the data we have is based on & that's what Pfizer recommend. 

Why the fuck you'd change that, I've no idea. Playing a very dangerous game. I suspect they're doing it so they can half vaccinate more people and make the numbers look more impressive. Trying to play the short term polling game, rather than taking the right course of action. They've done it all along through this and still haven't learnt their lesson. 

Link to comment

There was something like 50,000 in the Pfizer trials. I don't know anything about trials of new medicines but that sounds pretty large scale to me. 

Obviously it's nothing compared to the numbers of people who'll actually get the jab and given the short length of the trials, we've no idea the long term efficacy of the vaccines. 

Link to comment
56 minutes ago, Millertime said:

Thats the rhetoric starting to lay the groundwork for this lockdown going on and on, with it now obvious the vulnerable being vaccinated will not see an easing on things

In all seriousness, what's the way out of this?

Surely its going to lead to civil war as I can easily imagine factions of the population being not far away from rioting 

Been kicking off in Holland today. Amsterdam and Eindhoven 

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, Sooper-hanz said:

MT predicts a riot !

MT predicts a riot !

Watching the people get lairy
It's not very pretty I tell thee
Walking through town is quite scary
It's not very sensible either
A friend of a friend got the nineteen
He looked the wrong way unmasked at a teen
Would never have happened to DAYTS
Never forgets his mask...

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...