Parklife Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 1 hour ago, manboobs109 said: 400k is 0.006% of the population? Oops. I see my error. Thanks for the correction. 1 Link to comment
Poodler Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 5 minutes ago, minijc said: Cumdog already working on getting rid of the tanks so it's nae a real worry. Maybe he is likeable! Link to comment
Henry Posted September 22, 2020 Author Share Posted September 22, 2020 Bit of a damp squib from Boris. 1 Link to comment
Simply Red Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 14 minutes ago, Bad_Mobby said: ‘Staff in retail and indoor hospitality will have to wear masks. And they will be needed in taxis’ nae been doing that already? UK L O L Nah we’re too smart to all wear masks. We’ll make our own minds up on what is and isnt required re:covid/lockdown. We’re clever as fuck and dont conform if it doesnt suit us. We’ll also moan and bitch like wee girls about it. 1 2 1 Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 20 minutes ago, minijc said: Cumdog already working on getting rid of the tanks so it's nae a real worry. Aye but just wait till he sails big Lizzie into the new Nigg harbour, then we'll be sorry. Em, well we will once its finished... Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 I can't believe we're just accepting this. The threat of the military? Conviction without trial or chance of appeal? Denial of basic human rights? Mental. 1 2 Link to comment
Fridge Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 I didn’t hear it did he actually threaten military action? Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Yip. It's banana republic stuff Link to comment
Parklife Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 4 minutes ago, Fridge said: I didn’t hear it did he actually threaten military action? Only if you have WMD's in your garden and parliament passes a vote to invade you. 1 Link to comment
The Buzzard Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Gonna be a 3 week review of restrictions in place, which will appear to be mostly similar to Boris earlier. Think she wants to avoid this 6 month panic... 1 Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 It's complete nonsense. Even if there was 100% compliance with the laws the numbers of infections will still rise. Its an infectious disease, people will become infected. We'll end up in lock down again unless the politicians change their thinking(they won't) Link to comment
Foster14 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Just now, The Buzzard said: Gonna be a 3 week review of restrictions in place, which will appear to be mostly similar to Boris earlier. Think she wants to avoid this 6 month panic... Cheers. So 2 households still fine and no travel restrictions? Link to comment
Zeus Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 383 in Scotland today. 3 in Aberdeen. Link to comment
The Buzzard Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Work from home for everyone where possible. FACTS advice being reinforced as people are getting sloppy and more help for those who need to self isolate. 10pm shutting for pubs etc. too. From tomorrow visiting other households barred Rule of 6 for indoor public spaces still applies. Kids/youths seem to be exempted from being part of that 6 Advising against car shares with people outside own household No 'circuit break' but will be kept under review 3 Link to comment
zander Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, Zeus said: 383 in Scotland today. 3 in Aberdeen. Just a thought but wonder if those 3 in Aberdeen are community based or for those heading offshore? Link to comment
The Buzzard Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Unlikely that we'll see any change to the route map. No mention of sporting events or any changes to care home visits b Link to comment
Studebaker-90 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Why is that floppy haired prick suggesting measures will be in place for 6 months? Seems a bit of a long time to be guessing how it’s going to play out with so many factors in play. Link to comment
Foster14 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 13 minutes ago, The Buzzard said: From tomorrow visiting other households barred Load of shit. Why is that not reviewed locally instead of Scotland wide? 1 Link to comment
CraigHill Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, Studebaker-90 said: Why is that floppy haired prick suggesting measures will be in place for 6 months? Seems a bit of a long time to be guessing how it’s going to play out with so many factors in play. Final eternity arouses reactions. 1 Link to comment
Zeus Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Foster14 said: Load of shit. Why is that not reviewed locally instead of Scotland wide? Especially when you look at the numbers. Frustrating Link to comment
Parklife Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 8 minutes ago, Foster14 said: Load of shit. Why is that not reviewed locally instead of Scotland wide? Agree. Assume it's for clarity of message. 2 Link to comment
The Buzzard Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 9 minutes ago, Foster14 said: Load of shit. Why is that not reviewed locally instead of Scotland wide? I think she has/will mention something to do with West of Scotland, but I can't mind what it was! Link to comment
BrianFaePerth Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 So threats of the military if people don’t wear masks (which have no proven benefit) and infect each other with a cold. Not at all fucked up 1 Link to comment
Foster14 Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 Where is the logic in allowing two households to meet in a pub, restaurant, cafe etc but not in the home?! I do not understand. Link to comment
BrianFaePerth Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Foster14 said: Where is the logic in allowing two households to meet in a pub, restaurant, cafe etc but not in the home?! I do not understand. The authorities can’t control you there. Yet. Link to comment
minijc Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 1 minute ago, Foster14 said: Where is the logic in allowing two households to meet in a pub, restaurant, cafe etc but not in the home?! I do not understand. I assume it's because the staff in these places should be enforcing the rules where as at home you'd be less likely to enforce them. 1 Link to comment
Poodler Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 21 minutes ago, BrianFaePerth said: So threats of the military if people don’t wear masks (which have no proven benefit) and infect each other with a cold. Not at all fucked up Yeah horrific choice of words from that weirdo in charge. Once again, just ignore what she says. If you know where to look, pubs will be open past curfew. Link to comment
thedandydon Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 2 minutes ago, Foster14 said: Where is the logic in allowing two households to meet in a pub, restaurant, cafe etc but not in the home?! I do not understand. Covid doesnt come out until 10pm in these places... I think..I've lost track to be honest. As a family of 5, we're fucked, regardless of this gaping loophole. Potentially six months of this shitshow! Link to comment
Fridge Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 27 minutes ago, BrianFaePerth said: So threats of the military if people don’t wear masks (which have no proven benefit) and infect each other with a cold. Not at all fucked up So what are they going to do, shoot me if I don’t wear a mask! Link to comment
Don Shula Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 So let me see if I understand this. Glasgow/Lanarkshire, which had 273 new cases yesterday where clearly the virus is out of control have only one major change of pubs shutting early whereas Grampian (and Tayside for that matter) which had 7 new cases yesterday so clearly not out of control have not only pubs shutting early but also now have new household restrictions. What the fuck am I missing apart from the obvious weegie bias?????? 5 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now