The Boofon 3,996 Posted January 24 11 hours ago, Big Hat Logan said: Yes, completely dull/boring/uninteresting. You are absolutely beige. There is nothing remarkable or interesting about you whatsoever, which is why you constantly crave attention on an Internet football forum. Jesus. Self awareness in short supply here. 1 Share this post Link to post
ConsiCanBoogie1903 44 Posted January 24 4 hours ago, DelMonte said: Watch it back. He blocked it with his feet and it unluckily hit him. He done alright today aside from the one dodgy pass. Don’t get the desperation to slate him. No idea how folk have came to the conclusion it's a pen. His arm is in a natural position and he makes a goal saving challenge with his feet before it rides up and strikes his arm. He was decent yesterday, gave the ball away a few times but looked much tidier. Share this post Link to post
The Boofon 3,996 Posted January 24 11 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: No idea how folk have came to the conclusion it's a pen. His arm is in a natural position and he makes a goal saving challenge with his feet before it rides up and strikes his arm. He was decent yesterday, gave the ball away a few times but looked much tidier. New rules. That's a stone wall penalty. Got out of jail there. Arms were not in natural position. Natural if you're falling over aye but his arms making his body outline bigger. Penalty. Share this post Link to post
ConsiCanBoogie1903 44 Posted January 24 2 minutes ago, The Boofon said: New rules. That's a stone wall penalty. Got out of jail there. Arms were not in natural position. Natural if you're falling over aye but his arms making his body outline bigger. Penalty. But if you're sliding in, as he was, where are your hands meant to go? For me, because it his foot first then up on to his arm, it's not a pen. If it had just hit his arm whilst goal bound then it's a stonewaller. The rules have relaxed somewhat re handball in the box, when at the start of the season pens were being handed out for fuck all. Share this post Link to post
CrazyBullSheep 203 Posted January 24 12 hours ago, The Gee Man said: Be interesting to see what Del will say about big Sam in next few days, certainly got the service and had chances today but didn’t deliver. Hopefully he gets his arm around but also tells him to wake up and get sharper Hopefully it goes a little something like this " Off you fuck. you lanky piece of shit" Put his arm around him? fuck that the boy is a prima donna thinks hes above the dons now get him to fuck, and soon. Share this post Link to post
The Boofon 3,996 Posted January 24 55 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: But if you're sliding in, as he was, where are your hands meant to go? For me, because it his foot first then up on to his arm, it's not a pen. If it had just hit his arm whilst goal bound then it's a stonewaller. The rules have relaxed somewhat re handball in the box, when at the start of the season pens were being handed out for fuck all. Might have been relaxed but we'd be rightly screaming for that at the other end. Ball hits his hand when his arms are away from his body. Hoban got fucked for one of those earlier this season. Not up for arguing. Pen for me. Glad it wasn't given. Share this post Link to post
Tord31 523 Posted January 24 Ojo did enough to start the next game. If anyone wants him dropped then its virtanen who should get the shout ahead of campbell. Fingers crossed mcgeouch is ready soon as he makes a big difference Share this post Link to post
RUL 961 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, Tord31 said: Ojo did enough to start the next game. If anyone wants him dropped then its virtanen who should get the shout ahead of campbell. Fingers crossed mcgeouch is ready soon as he makes a big difference He's going to be fit in next two weeks. Share this post Link to post
Tord31 523 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, RUL said: He's going to be fit in next two weeks. He's back in training now so if nothing goes wrong he'll likely appear on the bench in one of the next two games. Considering there is 9 subs there is more scope for the likes of McGinn to be on the bench injured and Leigh is there after 2 days training Share this post Link to post
RUL 961 Posted January 24 9 minutes ago, Tord31 said: He's back in training now so if nothing goes wrong he'll likely appear on the bench in one of the next two games. Considering there is 9 subs there is more scope for the likes of McGinn to be on the bench injured and Leigh is there after 2 days training We are going to have a lot of options that's for sure. Share this post Link to post
Tord31 523 Posted January 24 Just now, RUL said: We are going to have a lot of options that's for sure. McGeouch is a big change as he is first team quality centre mid meaning McCrorie can play defence or wingback and Ferguson can play closer to the striker. Gives the tinkerman a few more options Share this post Link to post
ConsiCanBoogie1903 44 Posted January 24 35 minutes ago, The Boofon said: Might have been relaxed but we'd be rightly screaming for that at the other end. Ball hits his hand when his arms are away from his body. Hoban got fucked for one of those earlier this season. Not up for arguing. Pen for me. Glad it wasn't given. Aye Hoban got done for it when the rules were more strict. I think the ref applied common sense to the Ojo incident. Not looking to argue, I just don't think it was a pen, on the basis it struck his foot first, and his arms were raised as he was flying in to make the block, which he couldn't have done with his arms by his side. Share this post Link to post
Tord31 523 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: Aye Hoban got done for it when the rules were more strict. I think the ref applied common sense to the Ojo incident. Not looking to argue, I just don't think it was a pen, on the basis it struck his foot first, and his arms were raised as he was flying in to make the block, which he couldn't have done with his arms by his side. I disagree on the ref thinking anything. i dont think he spotted it Share this post Link to post
ConsiCanBoogie1903 44 Posted January 24 Just now, Tord31 said: I disagree on the ref thinking anything. i dont think he spotted it He was absolutely brutal, to be fair. Share this post Link to post
Tord31 523 Posted January 24 5 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: He was absolutely brutal, to be fair. I'd have sent off Gallagher inside five mins. Big call for a young ref to send off Scotland's best defender in the first few mins. The tackle was similar to Main's on Barisic and the pundits were unanimous that was a sending off Share this post Link to post
aberdeen1970 1,016 Posted January 24 Harsh folk criticising Ojo for the penalty that wasn't. Should be praised for the block. That's the important bit here. Any penalty would have been a result of bad luck rather than making the wrong decision. Share this post Link to post
Millertime 6,806 Posted January 24 Just now, Tord31 said: I'd have sent off Gallagher inside five mins. Big call for a young ref to send off Scotland's best defender in the first few mins. The tackle was similar to Main's on Barisic and the pundits were unanimous that was a sending off As I said at the time that was a red card 1 Share this post Link to post
standfree1978 7 Posted January 24 10 minutes ago, Tord31 said: McGeouch is a big change as he is first team quality centre mid meaning McCrorie can play defence or wingback and Ferguson can play closer to the striker. Gives the tinkerman a few more options Wouldn't want McCrorie playing in defence or at wing back. Far more influential in the middle of the park. Hopefully he comes back after his injury and plays like he did when he first joined, he's been bit quieter of late. Share this post Link to post
Tord31 523 Posted January 24 18 minutes ago, standfree1978 said: Wouldn't want McCrorie playing in defence or at wing back. Far more influential in the middle of the park. Hopefully he comes back after his injury and plays like he did when he first joined, he's been bit quieter of late. I wouldn't want it either but .... tinkerman. If McGeouch comes in and keeps his place he wont not start mccrorie or ferguson. Share this post Link to post
standfree1978 7 Posted January 24 22 minutes ago, Tord31 said: I wouldn't want it either but .... tinkerman. If McGeouch comes in and keeps his place he wont not start mccrorie or ferguson. Decision might be made easy if Wright joins them. As you say, Ferguson moves further up the park. Share this post Link to post
aberdeen1970 1,016 Posted January 24 Just now, standfree1978 said: Decision might be made easy if Wright joins them. As you say, Ferguson moves further up the park. A return to 4-2-3-1? Played with a back 4 for large parts of yesterday's game Share this post Link to post
standfree1978 7 Posted January 24 12 minutes ago, aberdeen1970 said: A return to 4-2-3-1? Played with a back 4 for large parts of yesterday's game With Ferguson behind the striker? He would certainly help with pressing the opposition defence Share this post Link to post
Betty Swallicks 65 Posted January 24 Hedges and Wright with a good attacking understanding. Kennedy decent too yesterday and nice to see him switching wings during the game for a change. What a difference if you actually play attacking/creative players further up the park. 4-2-3-1 please from now on and we'll blow away most of the dross in the league. Share this post Link to post
WesthillWanderersFC 52 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, Betty Swallicks said: Hedges and Wright with a good attacking understanding. Kennedy decent too yesterday and nice to see him switching wings during the game for a change. What a difference if you actually play attacking/creative players further up the park. 4-2-3-1 please from now on and we'll blow away most of the dross in the league. It wasn’t 4-2-3-1 yesterday though. It was 3-4-2-1 Share this post Link to post
Betty Swallicks 65 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, WesthillWanderersFC said: It wasn’t 4-2-3-1 yesterday though. It was 3-4-2-1 We did for a fair chunk of the game but regardless my point was we should play 4-2-3-1 from now on. Share this post Link to post
aberdeen1970 1,016 Posted January 24 6 minutes ago, WesthillWanderersFC said: It wasn’t 4-2-3-1 yesterday though. It was 3-4-2-1 Played with a back 4 for large parts of yesterday Share this post Link to post
ConsiCanBoogie1903 44 Posted January 24 Going forward with McGeouch fit I think a 4-3-3 is a decent option. McCrorie, Ferguson and McGeouch in a midfield 3 could be excellent, a blend of different players with different talents. Kennedy and hedges either flank tucking inside and linking, with full backs bombing on. Who knows. Share this post Link to post
DD1903 614 Posted January 24 4 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: Going forward with McGeouch fit I think a 4-3-3 is a decent option. McCrorie, Ferguson and McGeouch in a midfield 3 could be excellent, a blend of different players with different talents. Kennedy and hedges either flank tucking inside and linking, with full backs bombing on. Who knows. In the games against sevco, they were able to exploit the space between the midfield and defence a lot. Someone sitting would have helped nullify that to an extent. Share this post Link to post
Ernie McCracken 544 Posted January 24 (edited) On the plus side, Kennedy who has been a total fucking waste of space so far, appears to have finally realised that his job is to create and score goals. I'd still think it's highly unlikely that he'll turn into the player McInnes thinks is (he's 26 - he should have done it by now) but I guess there is a glimmer of hope. Edited January 24 by Ernie McCracken Share this post Link to post