mcdougall(4) Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 That's as blatant a penalty as you'll see... the guy had both arms above his head FFS. His first booking however was an absolute nonsense, he won the ball fairly against Morelos who then proceeded to jump in the air like a scalded cat. Ref: "oh, eh, that'll be a yellow then". Agree with this. Link to comment
BWG Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 That's as blatant a penalty as you'll see... the guy had both arms above his head FFS. His first booking however was an absolute nonsense, he won the ball fairly against Morelos who then proceeded to jump in the air like a scalded cat. Ref: "oh, eh, that'll be a yellow then". Motherwell's defending after the red card was reminiscent of ours at Parkhead in The Game Which Must Not Be Mentioned*, absolutely hideous stuff. *Aye, that 9-0 disaster... thanks McGhee. I think you'll find it was a dive sir. We are all in agreement. Link to comment
robbojunior Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 It was 100% not a pen. The rules for handball are that it must be deliberate. If anyone is saying he deliberately handled that ball then they do not know what they are talking about. No other consideration matters. Position of arms, outcome etc are all irrelevant. It has to be deliberate. Link to comment
Dr_Manhattan Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 It was 100% not a pen. The rules for handball are that it must be deliberate. If anyone is saying he deliberately handled that ball then they do not know what they are talking about. No other consideration matters. Position of arms, outcome etc are all irrelevant. It has to be deliberate. Agreed. This 'unnatural position' pish is wide open to interpretation and needs to be dropped. Hypothetical... a through ball is played to the striker who is borderline offside. Defender has his arms in the air claiming for offside. Meanwhile, the striker's shot is saved and rebounds to another player who blooters it off the defender's raised arm who isn't even looking in the direction of play. Penalty? Link to comment
Reed or deed Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Agreed. This 'unnatural position' pish is wide open to interpretation and needs to be dropped. Hypothetical... a through ball is played to the striker who is borderline offside. Defender has his arms in the air claiming for offside. Meanwhile, the striker's shot is saved and rebounds to another player who blooters it off the defender's raised arm who isn't even looking in the direction of play. Penalty?Against the Huns,yes. For the Huns, no. 1 1 Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 I can accept the unnnatural position thing for the penalty. If his arms aren’t there the balls not hitting them. Booking him for the deliberate intent is where Thomson loses the plot. I assume that was Robinson’s point. Link to comment
HairyPie Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 Gascoigne charged with sexual assault. Hope they throw the book at the cunt. Link to comment
Poodler Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 Wonder if that's why the hall of fame thing collapsed Link to comment
Reliablesource Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 Gascoigne charged with sexual assault. Hope they throw the book at the cunt.Jailed for Christmas? Link to comment
aberdeen1970 Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 Raoul Moat is on his way with some cans and a fishing rod 1 Link to comment
tightbreeks Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 gazza, sex case. what's gazza's favourite petrol? esso Link to comment
shut up meg Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 Gascoigne charged with sexual assault. Hope they throw the book at the cunt.Simply the breast 2 Link to comment
Betty Swallicks Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 Simply the breast. Simply a beast. Link to comment
Poodler Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 Simply a beast. A bheast, as they say Wonder how they're spinning it Link to comment
Sheepo Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 A bheast, as they say Wonder how they're spinning itThe Huns are appealing this and want the charge rescinded 1 Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted November 19, 2018 Share Posted November 19, 2018 The lassie to be given a suspension for having an extenuating chest? And for being a taig whore obviously? Link to comment
Betty Swallicks Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 Some fat beaut on SSN just now leaving the huns AGM claiming Dave King is rebuilding the club and that Connor Goldson is worth 10mil.They have some "real assets" apparently. 1 Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 Well that’s 71% of last years loss paid for then. (Annoyingly I acknowledge their Euro progress will easy cover the remainder) Cunts. Link to comment
Tord31 Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 Some fat beaut on SSN just now leaving the huns AGM claiming Dave King is rebuilding the club and that Connor Goldson is worth 10mil.They have some "real assets" apparently. Goldson is worth £0. He's already came back from a career ending illness. Link to comment
Guest milne_afc Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 Read that back to yourself. Link to comment
Tord31 Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 Fuck knows but he's doing well to be playing full time fitba - he's not getting signed by a bigger club Link to comment
Tord31 Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 It was meant to read like that - lad should be with Zero Link to comment
Henry Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 I see someone at the SFA has gone rogue. The Scottish FA has charged Rangers with bringing the game into disrepute after the club's criticism of referee Willie Collum. The Ibrox club released a statement and wrote a formal complaint to the SFA following the sending-off of Daniel Candeias against St Mirren this month. The governing body has now issued Rangers with a total of five charges including indicating bias. Rangers have until 4 December to respond to the charges. They will then face a hearing on 19 December. Rangers were enraged by Collum's decision to show Candeais a second yellow card for what the SFA later - in their written reasoning for the decision - called "gestures" at St Mirren defender Anton Ferdinand, immediately after Alfredo Morelos scored their second goal of a 2-0 win in stoppage time. Rangers boss Steven Gerrard branded the dismissal "embarrassing" but the club had an appeal based on 'mistaken identity' dismissed. In a statement responding to the appeal decision, Rangers called Collum's decision "inexplicable" and also claimed "it is understood that a number of people within the Scottish FA are in no doubt Collum's judgment was flawed" as the club announced it would be submitting "a formal complaint about the performance of this referee". The statement concluded: "The manner in which he reacted to an incident involving our player made it obvious he did not give due consideration to his decision. "This is by no means the first time errors of judgment have been made in matches involving this official and clearly there is an underlying issue which requires to be addressed." 1 Link to comment
The Boofon Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 Brilliant. Looking forward to the statement later. Link to comment
Tommy Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 Bottle thrower earlier in the season must have though he’d got off with it.Plod are on the hun t. 2 Link to comment
RUL Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 The rangers witch hunt has begun, magnificent. Link to comment
CityCentre Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 Hope it was a bottle of buckie. Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted November 29, 2018 Share Posted November 29, 2018 The hun sense of entitlement just hit a brick wall. Or a European referee as we call them. 9 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now