Jump to content

Scott Mckenna Ban For Tackle On Edouard


Recommended Posts


Would like to say this is a shock, but it isn't really, is it?

 

Still, I don't buy into the conspiracy (a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful).stuff. The authorities behaviour is hardly done behind closed doors, it's blatantly 'in your face'. Leave the paranoia to the blue and green cunts. Up to the club to take a stand here...

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment

Genuinely thought this was a joke when I first read it. Absolutely mental.

 

 

Seriously thought it was a parody tweet from someone using the BBC name on twitter. 

 

 

 

Same.

 

They are completely taking the piss now.

 

Do they think we button up the back?

Perhaps accepting shit like this leads them to believe we do.

Link to comment

Would like to say this is a shock, but it isn't really, is it?

 

Still, I don't buy into the conspiracy (a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful).stuff. The authorities behaviour is hardly done behind closed doors, it's blatantly 'in your face'. Leave the paranoia to the blue and green cunts. Up to the club to take a stand here...

There doesn't need to a conspiracy for there to be consistent bias within the football authorities.

Link to comment

Would like to say this is a shock, but it isn't really, is it?

 

Still, I don't buy into the conspiracy (a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful).stuff. The authorities behaviour is hardly done behind closed doors, it's blatantly 'in your face'. Leave the paranoia to the blue and green cunts. Up to the club to take a stand here...

Conspiracy theories can usually be explained by incompetence combined with implicit bias, that's most likely the case here

Link to comment

Why are folk even saying it’s a yellow card?

 

He goes for the ball

 

Gets the ball

 

The darkie boy runs into him (sending Mac flying)

 

Ref got it spot on IMHO

The way I saw it too.

 

Celtic player arrives at the ball way after Mckenna, Mckenna wins the ball and puts himself in a position not to be hurt by the late challenge on him and comes off better cause he's a hard cunt and the tim is a pussy. The ref had a good view and saw this also.

Link to comment

The way I saw it too.

 

Celtic player arrives at the ball way after Mckenna, Mckenna wins the ball and puts himself in a position not to be hurt by the late challenge on him and comes off better cause he's a hard cunt and the tim is a pussy. The ref had a good view and saw this also.

Not particularly disagreeing although the athletic chap arrives in the way he does because Logan pushes him if we’re being entirely honest.

 

I agree it’s not reallly a foul in real time but I’m happy that with the benefit of replays you could argue it’s dangerous by virtue of being clumsy but not reckless hence a yellow at most.

Link to comment

I agree it’s not reallly a foul in real time but I’m happy that with the benefit of replays you could argue it’s dangerous by virtue of being clumsy but not reckless hence a yellow at most.

Aye but I don't think that they can hand out a retrospective yellow card. They say it was a red that the ref saw and didn't give. I think that it's odds on that Mckenna is getting a long ban.

 

We are effectively appealing against a dodgy decision to the people who have originally given that dodgy decision, are we not? If this is the case, it's a very worrying situation.

Link to comment

It's fucking nonsense that they actually INCREASE bans after appealing.  Is there any other organisation that would do that? Imagine appealing a speeding ticket, but on rejection you're given an extra 3 points!

 

It's unbelievable that the clubs accept this sort of rubbish. It's no wonder we're struggling to compete with anyone in football when the people running our game still live in the middle ages, meeting in dark caves with masonic handshakes and robes. 

 

if there was a better way of boycotting the SFA than not going to Dons games, i'd 100% do it. I'm not for cutting off our nose to spite our face, which is what not giving Dons revenue is doing. 

Link to comment

It's fucking nonsense that they actually INCREASE bans after appealing. Is there any other organisation that would do that? Imagine appealing a speeding ticket, but on rejection you're given an extra 3 points!

 

It's unbelievable that the clubs accept this sort of rubbish. It's no wonder we're struggling to compete with anyone in football when the people running our game still live in the middle ages, meeting in dark caves with masonic handshakes and robes.

 

if there was a better way of boycotting the SFA than not going to Dons games, i'd 100% do it. I'm not for cutting off our nose to spite our face, which is what not giving Dons revenue is doing.

As I said. Next televised TV match attend the game then stage a mass walk out at 80 mins

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...