Jump to content

New Stadium Approved


Recommended Posts


The house and the land are a total mess, unkempt and run-down, doesn't look great next to our new complex.

Once all the planting is done you won't see the house from the complex due to all the trees and no doubt fencing will be erected too.

You can't force someone to sell up. We'd have to drag people through court for that process I'd imagine.

Goes completely against the 'good neighbour' mantra the club are trying to promote.

Link to comment

Once all the planting is done you won't see the house from the complex due to all the trees and no doubt fencing will be erected too.

You can't force someone to sell up. We'd have to drag people through court for that process I'd imagine.

Goes completely against the 'good neighbour' mantra the club are trying to promote.

 

They could make them an offer for the land/house, maybe they have.

Link to comment

The clever thing for anyone with land out there is to wait until the stadium is built, and then if/when either the club wanted to expand, other developers wanted to build things that would benefit from being close to the stadium, or the council wanted somewhere to put their monorail station, then the price will sour.

Link to comment
  • Site Sponsor

Aye massive.

 

 

And in the middle of fucking nowhere.

Not according to the NIMBYs.

 

It's right on their doorstep and they won't get to the cinema on a Saturday afternoon because of it, emergency services won't get through to Westhill and people will DIE!

 

People should stop greeting about the location.

 

It's going ahead, dry your eyes.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment

Not according to the NIMBYs.

 

It's right on their doorstep and they won't get to the cinema on a Saturday afternoon because of it, emergency services won't get through to Westhill and people will DIE!

 

People should stop greeting about the location.

 

It's going ahead, dry your eyes.

 

 

Hopefully the Milne loving happy clappers cheerleading us into the countryside are first in line

  • Downvote 6
Link to comment

Who does that pitch belong to in thr bottom left?

It’s Westdyke who use the pitch. It’s just round the corner from me. It’s a cracking pitch that’s for sure.

Surely to godwe will try and buy that house with the significant bit of land at the top right of the complex, looks so stupid

One of the houses to the far left of the site have already sold their house. So if people are wanting to sell them they will. Maybe the folk who live there are Dandies
Link to comment

It’s Westdyke who use the pitch. It’s just round the corner from me. It’s a cracking pitch that’s for sure.

One of the houses to the far left of the site have already sold their house. So if people are wanting to sell them they will. Maybe the folk who live there are Dandies

I think this house belongs to the gadgie who owned the land. Might have imagined reading that somewhere though
Link to comment

Aberdeen vice-chairman Cormack aiming for Kingsford stadium cash plan within 12 months

 

https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/fp/aberdeen-fc/donsnews/we-have-work-to-do-to-get-the-50m/

 

 

I like this bit:

 

Initially when the Kingsford plans were unveiled in 2016 the stadium was estimated at a cost of £40m.

But by spending more on the ground Cormack, who has visited a number of recently-built stadiums with commercial director Rob Wicks for research, believes it can be more beneficial to the Dons in the long term.

He said: “When you research other stadium builds you end up asking ‘if you spend £40m how much extra revenue can you generate?’

“The answer might be a £1m, but what if you spend £50m? We think if we do spend that we can generate an extra £3m-£5m in turnover per year.

 

Suggests we may not get a bigger version of a tinpot St. Johnstone or St. Mirren style ground as many have feared.

Hope the cunts mean it.

Link to comment

Initially when the Kingsford plans were unveiled in 2016 the stadium was estimated at a cost of £40m.

But by spending more on the ground Cormack, who has visited a number of recently-built stadiums with commercial director Rob Wicks for research, believes it can be more beneficial to the Dons in the long term.

He said: “When you research other stadium builds you end up asking ‘if you spend £40m how much extra revenue can you generate?’

“The answer might be a £1m, but what if you spend £50m? We think if we do spend that we can generate an extra £3m-£5m in turnover per year.

 

 

That is the exact kind of attitude this club has been missing for decades.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

Depends what you consider pish, I personally find you posting 100+ pictures of JCB diggers and timber frame buildings pish however each to their own.

 

Harsh on CityCentre.  He does a better job of keeping us up to date with the progress of the build than the club do.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...