RAZOR Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 So they going to ban the referee too? Fucking joke.Close. They've demoted him. He's doing Falkirk vs Dunfermline Link to comment
jassb Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Close. They've demoted him. He's doing Falkirk vs DunfermlineCunt probably stays near there and has to be home early for a night out. Link to comment
Rostov-on-Don Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Genuinely thought this was a joke when I first read it. Absolutely mental. Seriously thought it was a parody tweet from someone using the BBC name on twitter. Completely stunned. I'd now like a full Steve Clarke/Vladimir Romanov style news conference from the club. This is into the territory of putting people off going. Link to comment
the_shrimp Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 I'm stunned by this. Blatant agenda against us. Link to comment
maryhilldon Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Boycott the semi final. Link to comment
Rostov-on-Don Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Don't understand what fans of various teams are saying it's a red card for. It's not even a challenge. It's a running volley clearance with his weaker foot which he scuffs and the Celtic player runs into him after he's hit it. Link to comment
HairyPie Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Club needs to make a stand. Let's join Highland League as someone said, must be fairer. Link to comment
alscotoz Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Would like to say this is a shock, but it isn't really, is it? Still, I don't buy into the conspiracy (a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful).stuff. The authorities behaviour is hardly done behind closed doors, it's blatantly 'in your face'. Leave the paranoia to the blue and green cunts. Up to the club to take a stand here... 1 Link to comment
muttonhumper Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Genuinely thought this was a joke when I first read it. Absolutely mental. Seriously thought it was a parody tweet from someone using the BBC name on twitter. Same. They are completely taking the piss now. Do they think we button up the back?Perhaps accepting shit like this leads them to believe we do. Link to comment
V for Vendetta Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Would like to say this is a shock, but it isn't really, is it? Still, I don't buy into the conspiracy (a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful).stuff. The authorities behaviour is hardly done behind closed doors, it's blatantly 'in your face'. Leave the paranoia to the blue and green cunts. Up to the club to take a stand here...There doesn't need to a conspiracy for there to be consistent bias within the football authorities. Link to comment
RAZOR Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 There doesn't need to a conspiracy for there to be consistent bias within the football authorities.It's also nowhere near 'in your face'. Everything seems to go on closed doors in some cigar lit seedy Glasgow conference room. Link to comment
eeps Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Would like to say this is a shock, but it isn't really, is it? Still, I don't buy into the conspiracy (a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful).stuff. The authorities behaviour is hardly done behind closed doors, it's blatantly 'in your face'. Leave the paranoia to the blue and green cunts. Up to the club to take a stand here...Conspiracy theories can usually be explained by incompetence combined with implicit bias, that's most likely the case here Link to comment
eeps Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 It's also nowhere near 'in your face'. Everything seems to go on closed doors in some cigar lit seedy Glasgow conference room.These meetings should have published minutes or at least be subject to FoI. Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Dear SFA I’d like Naismith to miss the next two fixtures just cos. Yours etc Rob Milsoms knee Link to comment
RAZOR Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 These meetings should have published minutes or at least be subject to FoI. I think if the clubs don't request it then more fool them. Sit back, spread them and prepare of dry insertion. Link to comment
CityCentre Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 The fact that we can't get a run of games with McKenna and Devlin playing together is the most annoying part, one or the other is even injured or suspended. Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Correct. Yellow card for clumsiness. Nothing more. And if they’re going to start this retrospective shit for this kind of tackle it has to be consistent. We all know it won’t be. Link to comment
HairyPie Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 I think if the clubs don't request it then more fool them. Sit back, spread them and prepare of dry insertion.Tears / blood mixture for lube. Link to comment
Donstar83 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 If he gets banned, could he miss the semi? Link to comment
StandFree1982 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Just play the cunt regardless if he's banned or not. Fuck em right in the pussy. Link to comment
NEM Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Time has come for the rest of the clubs to resign from the league and go it alone. Tell the SPFL and SFA to fuck right off and leave the bigots to play each other every week Link to comment
sooth_stander Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 If he gets banned, could he miss the semi?If we lose the appeal and its gets increased to 3, then yes Link to comment
Reliablesource Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Why are folk even saying it’s a yellow card? He goes for the ball Gets the ball The darkie boy runs into him (sending Mac flying) Ref got it spot on IMHOThe way I saw it too. Celtic player arrives at the ball way after Mckenna, Mckenna wins the ball and puts himself in a position not to be hurt by the late challenge on him and comes off better cause he's a hard cunt and the tim is a pussy. The ref had a good view and saw this also. Link to comment
Ernie McCracken Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 These meetings should have published minutes or at least be subject to FoI.They'd just manipulate the notes. They meetings should be videod and posted to YouTube. Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 The way I saw it too. Celtic player arrives at the ball way after Mckenna, Mckenna wins the ball and puts himself in a position not to be hurt by the late challenge on him and comes off better cause he's a hard cunt and the tim is a pussy. The ref had a good view and saw this also.Not particularly disagreeing although the athletic chap arrives in the way he does because Logan pushes him if we’re being entirely honest. I agree it’s not reallly a foul in real time but I’m happy that with the benefit of replays you could argue it’s dangerous by virtue of being clumsy but not reckless hence a yellow at most. Link to comment
Reliablesource Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 If he gets banned, could he miss the semi?He is banned. As it stands, the anonymous huns have banned him for 2 matches. Like someone said, it could be more if we lose the appeal and that could mean the semi I think. Link to comment
Reliablesource Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 I agree it’s not reallly a foul in real time but I’m happy that with the benefit of replays you could argue it’s dangerous by virtue of being clumsy but not reckless hence a yellow at most.Aye but I don't think that they can hand out a retrospective yellow card. They say it was a red that the ref saw and didn't give. I think that it's odds on that Mckenna is getting a long ban. We are effectively appealing against a dodgy decision to the people who have originally given that dodgy decision, are we not? If this is the case, it's a very worrying situation. Link to comment
G31DON Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 I've forgotten how many games the ruling body "offered" the hun keeper for his kick? Link to comment
StandFree1982 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 It's fucking nonsense that they actually INCREASE bans after appealing. Is there any other organisation that would do that? Imagine appealing a speeding ticket, but on rejection you're given an extra 3 points! It's unbelievable that the clubs accept this sort of rubbish. It's no wonder we're struggling to compete with anyone in football when the people running our game still live in the middle ages, meeting in dark caves with masonic handshakes and robes. if there was a better way of boycotting the SFA than not going to Dons games, i'd 100% do it. I'm not for cutting off our nose to spite our face, which is what not giving Dons revenue is doing. Link to comment
1903Fitba Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 It's fucking nonsense that they actually INCREASE bans after appealing. Is there any other organisation that would do that? Imagine appealing a speeding ticket, but on rejection you're given an extra 3 points! It's unbelievable that the clubs accept this sort of rubbish. It's no wonder we're struggling to compete with anyone in football when the people running our game still live in the middle ages, meeting in dark caves with masonic handshakes and robes. if there was a better way of boycotting the SFA than not going to Dons games, i'd 100% do it. I'm not for cutting off our nose to spite our face, which is what not giving Dons revenue is doing.As I said. Next televised TV match attend the game then stage a mass walk out at 80 mins Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now