tightbreeks Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Life after porn, not looking to rosey for Ms. Carrera. Ectoid punter, Shaun attwood might do a podcast on the nasty wifey. Link to comment
Henry Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Though it flies in the face of all secular, scientific and psychosexual orthodoxy, the leaders of Catholicism (as many as 80% of them gay themselves, according to a new book by sociologist Frederic Martel) persist in equating same-sex adult sexual attraction with the violent rape of children by grown men. Perhaps the most misleading excuse given is that Catholicism is just the same as others, including the BBC, that have faced charges over harbouring those who abuse children. However, a range of studies suggests that Catholicism is different. The number of paedophiles found in the male population at large is usually put at anywhere up to 4%. Yet the recent Australian Royal Commission on child sex abuse by Catholic priests suggests the figure in clerical ranks is as high as 7%. That’s almost double, and should be ringing alarm bells. Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Surely 4% of men aren't paedophiles? That seems awful high to me. Link to comment
Redforever86 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 100% of tims too Link to comment
The Boofon Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 100% of tims tooand Catholics. Link to comment
Arabian Knight Posted February 19, 2019 Share Posted February 19, 2019 dae even ken god, clydesidesheep. mist be a diferent god thit judges cunts n disna forgive..ye need tae confess yer sins tae this god. yer nae a gade patron eh the church if ye hink gods the taskmaster yer makkin him oot tae be. wis thir nae a coupla cunts oan here dyin fae aids? ready tae tak thir last breath.. If thiv passed oan tae the next world thir in gods airms the noo..CS wid hae ye believe thir oan fire in satans lair wi alec salmond..time fir ye tae re read yer scriptures wee man Link to comment
Henry Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 Activists for survivors of clerical sexual abuse have reacted furiously after Pope Francis failed to promise a “zero tolerance” approach to paedophile priests and the bishops who cover up their crimes as he closed a landmark summit at the Vatican. Francis vowed that the Roman Catholic church would “spare no effort” to bring abusers to justice and would not cover up or underestimate abuse, but a significant part of the pontiff’s closing speech focused on the prevalence of child abuse across society. Citing data, he said that the majority of cases arose within families and that the perpetrators of abuse were “primarily parents, relatives, husbands of child brides and teachers”. He also said that online pornography and sex tourism amplified the issue. “Our work has made us realise once again that the gravity of the scourge of the sexual abuse of minors is, and historically has been, a widespread phenomenon in all cultures and societies,” he said. “I am reminded of the cruel religious practice, once widespread in certain cultures, of sacrificing human beings – frequently children – in pagan rites” While the pope acknowledged that the occurrence of the sexual abuse of children within the Catholic church was even more “scandalous” due to its incompatibility “with her moral authority and ethical credibility”, his speech failed to reflect the concrete action that survivors of sex abuse were hoping for. A bit of whataboutery from Pope Link to comment
Parklife Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 CS will be gutted that the conclusion wasn't "it woz the poofs wot done it". Link to comment
maryhilldon Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 My least favourite thread on here. Just boring as fuck.Yep. CS is a proper wierdo. 2 1 Link to comment
G31DON Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 "at least we don't do human sacrifice, what more do you want?" Top Pope-ING. Link to comment
alscotoz Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 Was 3rd highest honcho within this organisation not too long ago...in fact as recently as December when he was first found guilty but like most things the CC sought to hush it up, by using the courts. Wondered why he fought so hard to give victims their say or follow up their accusations...not really. The 'Melbourne Response'? https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/cardinal-george-pell-found-guilty-of-child-sex-abuse-20181214-p50m86.html Link to comment
BrianFaePerth Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 This would never have happened on Father Ted Link to comment
Ohjimmyjimmy Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 George Pell: Cardinal found guilty of sexual offences in Australia http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-47366113 Another Gaylord outed. Link to comment
alscotoz Posted February 27, 2019 Share Posted February 27, 2019 In the jail now, is Pell https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02-27/george-pell-faces-court-after-conviction-for-abusing-choirboys/10852940 Link to comment
Henry Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 Robert Richter has apologised for his “terrible choice of phrase” in describing George Pell’s sexual abuse of a 13-year-old choirboy as “vanilla sexual penetration”. The queen’s counsel has been widely criticised for the remark, which came during a plea hearing for the cardinal who is now behind bars awaiting sentence for orally raping the boy, and molesting him and another 13-year-old after a Sunday mass in 1996. Richter was attempting to note there were no aggravating features to Pell’s offending, at a time when he was newly installed as archbishop of Melbourne at St Patrick’s cathedral. “This is no more than a plain, vanilla sexual penetration case where a child is not volunteering or actively participating,” he said. But on Thursday he issued an apology after a “sleepless night reflecting”. lol Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted February 28, 2019 Share Posted February 28, 2019 that would’ve been a good 1-2 Link to comment
BWG Posted April 13, 2019 Share Posted April 13, 2019 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-europe-47898562 Those bloody hippies are apparently to blame for the centuries of noncing in the Catholic church. Link to comment
Ke1t Posted June 3, 2019 Share Posted June 3, 2019 Is this the most fucked up 'Catholic Rapes Children' story yet? Catholic Rapes Children and Sky Is Blue It's probably not, but it's still fairly fucked up, I trust you'll agree. Link to comment
boboisared Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 Is this the most fucked up 'Catholic Rapes Children' story yet? Catholic Rapes Children and Sky Is Blue It's probably not, but it's still fairly fucked up, I trust you'll agree. Grim stuff that. Link to comment
tiktak Posted June 4, 2019 Share Posted June 4, 2019 I'm not going to read all that stuff in the opening post, can't be arsed. I was brought up as a Catholic and abhor the simple fact that my parents and teachers at school had the temerity to try to brainwash me with all of their God shite. Like every other religion Catholicism is nothing more than a cult. Just so happens that some cults are larger and more successful than others. The cult of Jesus Christ or Muhammad are no less ridiculous than the cult of Ron L Hubbard. Besides, everybody knows the only true god is Willy Wonka. Link to comment
Clydeside_Sheep Posted June 5, 2019 Author Share Posted June 5, 2019 Is this the most fucked up 'Catholic Rapes Children' story yet? Catholic Rapes Children and Sky Is Blue It's probably not, but it's still fairly fucked up, I trust you'll agree. It may well be, but important to note that the man raped the boys because he is a predatory homosexual, not because he is a catholic. This requires a bit of intellectual honesty to admit, of course, which has not always been your strong point. Meanwhile, a 7 year old boy dressed in high heels and a skirt has won an award at the LA pride parade, for his "fierce strut". (note the media prefer to call him a "Trans Child" rather than a "boy") https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/news/7-year-old-trans-child-wins-la-pride-parade-with-fierce-strut-in-heels/vp-AAyvLv9 And society whoops and cheers at this - it seems problems intellectual honesty are widespread. 2 2 Link to comment
boboisared Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 It may well be, but important to note that the man raped the boys because he is a predatory homosexual, not because he is a catholic. This requires a bit of intellectual honesty to admit, of course, which has not always been your strong point. Meanwhile, a 7 year old boy dressed in high heels and a skirt has won an award at the LA pride parade, for his "fierce strut". (note the media prefer to call him a "Trans Child" rather than a "boy") https://www.msn.com/en-gb/sport/news/7-year-old-trans-child-wins-la-pride-parade-with-fierce-strut-in-heels/vp-AAyvLv9 And society whoops and cheers at this - it seems problems intellectual honesty are widespread.So are you saying that boy is asking for it? Link to comment
Clydeside_Sheep Posted June 5, 2019 Author Share Posted June 5, 2019 I was brought up as a Catholic and abhor the simple fact that my parents and teachers at school had the temerity to try to brainwash me with all of their God shite. I am sure your parents meant well. Passing on standards and values is fundamentally what parents do - it was no more outrageous for them to introduce to Christian values, than it was for them to teach you to say please or thank you, or (possibly) to raise you an an aberdeen fan. That you have elected to reject these values, proves that you were not brain-washed and so don't resent them over it. If you are a similar age to me, your experience of Catholicism in could probably be described mere fluff. I would imagine (authentic) Christianity is more coherent and intellectually satisfying than the cult of "nothing made everything for no reason" but each to their own. Link to comment
Betty Swallicks Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 I am sure your parents meant well. Passing on standards and values is fundamentally what parents do - it was no more outrageous for them to introduce to Christian values, than it was for them to teach you to say please or thank you, or (possibly) to raise you an an aberdeen fan. That you have elected to reject these values, proves that you were not brain-washed and so don't resent them over it. If you are a similar age to me, your experience of Catholicism in could probably be described mere fluff. I would imagine (authentic) Christianity is more coherent and intellectually satisfying than the cult of "nothing made everything for no reason" but each to their own. Link to comment
Clydeside_Sheep Posted June 5, 2019 Author Share Posted June 5, 2019 So are you saying that boy is asking for it? That's a strange conclusion. (btw he's a "trans child" not a "boy"). I was saying that society has a very selective recognition / concern regarding LGBT exploitation of children. And no I don't directly equate the 2 stories, before you ask, but I think dressing a boy in a skirt and heels and applauding his provocative behaviour ("strutting") highlights how unhealthy the LGBT attitude towards kids is. Yet you seem to think I am blaming the boy himself for something, just as kelt blames catholicism for a homosexual raping boys. What is with the major blind spot here? 1 1 Link to comment
Betty Swallicks Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 Is this the most fucked up 'Catholic Rapes Children' story yet? Catholic Rapes Children and Sky Is Blue It's probably not, but it's still fairly fucked up, I trust you'll agree. Fucking horrible story. The Father Fred bit made me chuckle a bit tho. Am I going to hell @clydeside_neep? Link to comment
fatjim Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 I am sure your parents meant well. Passing on standards and values is fundamentally what parents do - it was no more outrageous for them to introduce to Christian values, than it was for them to teach you to say please or thank you, or (possibly) to raise you an an aberdeen fan. That you have elected to reject these values, proves that you were not brain-washed and so don't resent them over it. If you are a similar age to me, your experience of Catholicism in could probably be described mere fluff. I would imagine (authentic) Christianity is more coherent and intellectually satisfying than the cult of "nothing made everything for no reason" but each to their own. To be fair though Christianity is a jewish cult. Why does there have to be a reason for nothing making everything? If God did make everything why did he make it so badly? 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now