Jump to content

Sevco Thread


Recommended Posts


Daily record today is unreadable, such is the ultra paranoid vitriol printed today. Especially Traynor. All I can say is this on the matter.

 

Dear Glasgow Rangers, The Rangers, Sevco 5088, or whatever you call yourself

 

Go fuck yourselves.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

The civilised world.

 

Ignore it. Don't get worked up.

 

They're dead. The bit in bold is evidence enough. Rangers football club is in liquidation. In other words dead. It's there in black and white for all to see. It no longer exists in any shape or form no matter how much they try and dress it up.

 

 

Even the Retard admit it so.

 

Retard Article

 

RANGERS Football Club has won its appeal over a near

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment

Am I right in thinking this whole Hunco thing is a bit like If Jimmy saville won an (alleged sexual Abuse) case against him. And his son / Daughter started John'll Fix it on some backward channel 300 on Sky

 

Completely different programmes but still smells of the same Shite. With No JFI badges to show the connection

 

Or I may just be talking complete Bollocks

Link to comment

There is no tax liability (except in a handful of cases where there were certain errors made).

 

The majority verdict of the Tribunal, rightly or wrongly (the latter IMO), is that the payments are simply loans to be repaid at some point in the future - either when they come up for renewal every 10 years, from the beneficiary's estate on death or some other point before then.

 

However, it would surely be proper for BDO to demand immediate repayment of the full value of the loans to forward to the creditors.

Link to comment

The thrust of the DR today, as expected given its readership, is asking the question why HMRC were able to influence hunbo's onward sale from Murray so much on the strength of a debt that is now decided by a majority of 2 to 1 didn't exist. I have a degree of sympathy ON THIS SINGULAR POINT. Evrything else, I'm afraid, is entirely of Hunbo's own doing.

 

From an AFC fans perspective I think two things are now key (three if you include that all of our players and staff should now be paid loans, not salaries). The SPL enquiry is on a sticky wicket in so far as the tribunal has specifically highlighted that almost all of the practises were carried out whilst deliberately withholding information from the registration bodies. Hunbo did not say here's the salary and here's the loan are these OK? They said here's the salary..... There is regrettably a gaping escape route for Doncaster via LNS to claim that loans, remember 100% non repayable and non interest bearing, are not payments (the tribunal interestingly noted "the spirit of the footballing regulations" not the "clear meaning" or the "undeniable requirements" or the "read the fucking text its pretty fucking explicit Campbell Ogilvie you criminal cnnt") so no need to declare so very disappointingly and in the face of a vat of evidence to the contrary another not proven verdict is looming I fear.

 

If they are found innocent (apparently the same as not proven), should we consider any response? At some point you have to accept that however questionable the motives of those holding power they are there to do a job and are doing it to the best of their and their learned advisor's ability. Just because a decision is 99% supported by evidence and 99.9% supported by common taxpayer's opinion doesn't make it right.

 

If they are found guilty I go back to a point raised many times previously - that removing titles is just a cosmetic slap to a history fuelled WATP tatoo ridden face. It will make absolutely no difference to the new entity at all other than to sell even more shares, a new entity whom lets never forget were shoe horned back into the league on the back of an unseen agreement to accept the oldco's footballing punishments. So, what should the punishment be, or rather, what should the clubs position be if this dilemma is to come about?

 

My own feeling, and this it galls me to say is in full expectation of a not proven verdict, is that they refuse to move from Doncaster's statement yesterday, that the positions in any restructure are awarded on footballing merit and nothing else - in other words the spawn of satan can work their way up through the leagues as they themselves stated an intention to do.

 

In the meantime it is up to Aberdeen to make hay whilst the sun shines

Link to comment

Bit of a let down. It doesn't actually change things but it would have nice to have yet another final nail rammed into their coffin but they can't get any more dead. It was just vindictiveness that hoped for more humiliation really.

 

That said I hope HMRC appeal and drag out the death throes of Rangers Football Club even more.

 

(Yeah I said it was vindictive... didn't say there was anything actually wrong with that)

 

 

Link to comment

I'm looking forward to Comet getting to the firesale part of their liquidation and I'm going to refuse that any shops that move into their premises are anyhting other than Comet. That should mean comet are still alive and trading.

 

 

See post 307 Coops.

 

As for all of this honours being bought with the assets pish they come out with.

 

That means deid Rangers have got no honours and the rangers have won no trophies.

 

Go figure that one out orcs. :lolrangers:

Link to comment
  • Admin

Haha god knows what I was doing to get that message, most impressed though. You not been head hunted by Apple or Google yet?

 

Was in advanced discussions with Apple but then Charles Green said they were in the running to buy the naming rights to iBrox so told them to go fuck themselves.

 

500 error

404 error

 

Although we use Cloudflare so you don't tend to see them when the site is down.

Link to comment

Rangers don't exist anymore so to be honest this is no skin off my nose.

 

The the rangers fan at my work was grinning like a Cheshire cat last night at tea time. I just went straight for the jugular.

 

Me:

 

"I see your old team won their tax case"

 

Him:

 

(Smile visibly draining) What do you mean my old team?

 

Me:

 

Well the BBC article I read about the news states that Charles Green formed a new club who now play in Division 3. That means his club are a NEW club which means Rangers are deid.

 

Him:

 

Fuck you.

 

:laughing:

 

Nothing better than taking the wind out of their sails immediately.

 

Any joy he thought he had about his old team winning the tax case taken straight away. They all know it's a new club they just cannot admit it. Long may it continue for the deluded fuckwits.

:laughing::applause:

+1

Link to comment

My understanding is that Duff & Phelps were appointed by Craig Whyte and they took the decision to liquidate after failing to agree a CVA.

 

You could say HMRC are indirectly responsible but it would have been so much more entertaining had they been directly responsible on the back of a debt which failed to materialise.

Link to comment

My understanding is that Duff & Phelps were appointed by Craig Whyte and they took the decision to liquidate after failing to agree a CVA.

 

You could say HMRC are indirectly responsible but it would have been so much more entertaining had they been directly responsible on the back of a debt which failed to materialise.

 

It was only HMRC that rejected the CVA. Ticketus were not classed as a creditor. Everyone else (apart from I think two small creditors - perhaps foreign football clubs IIRC) accepted it. They liquidated as they knew that HMRC would not accept any CVA, unless it had considerable recovery (upwards of 90% I'd guess).

 

So HMRC forced them in to administration then forced the administrators in to having to accept liquidation.

 

Actually, on re-reading your last bit, I assume you'd find it funnier if HMRC had not had enough debt to reject the CVA without the Big Tax Case and now that it had been thrown out, the CVA would have been rejected by someone who when it came down to it, shouldn't have been able to. I agree, that would be funnier.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...