Jump to content

Aberdeen 2 - 0 Hearts


Recommended Posts

Considine returns. McGinn, Nwakali and Devlin doubtful

 

A win would certainly make us favourites for 2nd place

 

Lewis

 

Logan O'Connor McKenna Considine

 

McLean Shinnie

 

Stewart Christie GMS

 

May

 

subs: Woodman, Ball, Reynolds, Rooney, Arnason, McGinn, Cosgrove

 

prediction 1-0 Rooney pen

Link to comment

'Won more points than we've lost'? Nonsensical.

You're right actually. But every team in the top 5 has won more points than they've dropped. (102 points played for)

Is he right though?

Get some stato on it.

 

We start each game with one point really. So that means 34 points as of today.

Meaning we have won 31 points as we are on 65 points now.

 

We have lost (or not won) a potential 37 more points going by 2 points available above the starting 1 point we start each game on.

 

We have won, or gained 31 points more than we start out on at kick offs.

We have lost out on a potential 37 more points up to now

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

Is he right though?

Get some stato on it.

 

We start each game with one point really. So that means 34 points as of today.

Meaning we have won 31 points as we are on 65 points now.

 

We have lost (or not won) a potential 37 more points going by 2 points available above the starting 1 point we start each game on.

 

We have won, or gained 31 points more than we start out on at kick offs.

We have lost out on a potential 37 more points up to now

I'm too drunk to check your maths but your basic premise is bang on.

 

Kills the "but we've won more than we lost" contrariness stone dead.

Link to comment

I'm too drunk to check your maths but your basic premise is bang on.

 

Kills the "but we've won more than we lost" contrariness stone dead.

 

The basic premise is bullshit. You don't get a point just for turning up, you have to play 90 minutes and not get beat to earn your point.

 

There are 4 teams in the league with less than 34 points so to suggest you start each game with a point is more FnD bullshittery

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment

The basic premise is bullshit. You don't get a point just for turning up, you have to play 90 minutes and not get beat to earn your point.

 

There are 4 teams in the league with less than 34 points so to suggest you start each game with a point is more FnD bullshittery

Those four teams are even more shit. They lost the one point they started with.

 

It isn't bullshit at all.

Each team starts the game on one point until they go ahead or fall behind.

Hence why if you look at the table whilst games are on going the table reads 'as it stands'

 

So fk your bullshittery

Link to comment

Plenty teams try to defend the point they START EACH GAME WITH JUST FOR TURNING UP.

As soon as first ball is kicked in a game each team is on one point. It is then up to those teams how they go from there.

 

All about how you view it though. Earning a point in a game to me is more often than not losing out on two rather than gaining one.

 

Wee teams celebrate draws. When we start doing that too often we are just being guilty of falling into a wee team mentality.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...