

Fake Spokesperson Emails
#1
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 09:21 PM
#2
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 09:24 PM
Hud on. That's made up surely
Edited by Zeus, 13 April 2018 - 09:25 PM.
#3
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 09:41 PM
Selection of emails sent by NKS using their fake spokesperson.
They talked about using the fake person to launch an attack on two Councillors because they were pro-stadium or Dons fans - but decided to use a real person - very brave.
From: Charlie Love
Sent: 14 August 2016 16:42
To: Diane Reid
Cc: Clare Davidson; Heather Brock
Subject: Re: Politicians' feedback
Hi all,
Angus gave an interview with P&J today in relation to this survey. The survey is poorly constructed (survey monkey could have produced a branching poll or something much more sophisticated)– it also could have required specific information so that respondents can be identified as coming from Westhill.
The interview with P&J went as follows:
We welcome the survey by Stewart Donaldson –the people of Westhill are absolutely against this stadium proposal and wish to retain the green belt between Kingswells and Westhill.
We have some concerns as to the accuracy of the survey because we know that the link to the survey is being shared across football forums with many from outside the area likely completing it.
Charlie
From: Charlie Love
Sent: 27 August 2017 14:10
To: Matthew Reid
Cc: Diane Reid; Clare Davidson; Heather Brock
Subject: Re: Letter
Yes.
He is next. Just have to draft the letter.
C
On 27 Aug 2017 12:32, Matthew Reid wrote:
Will we be considering our approach to the chap that has 500 AFC shares too?
Please forgive me if message brief - it's sent from my tablet pc
On 27 Aug 2017, at 12:29, Heather Brock wrote:
Absolutely Matthew, I know that. Thank you
On 27 Aug 2017, at 12:28, Matthew Reid wrote:
No bother. You know I just express this cos I care H!
M Please forgive me if message brief - it's sent from my tablet pc
On 27 Aug 2017, at 12:07, Charlie Love wrote:
Hi all
I agree with Heather. Using a pseudonym for such a legal letter may undermine it.
I think it needs to be from HB.
Charlie
On 27 Aug 2017 12:00, Heather Brock wrote:
I don't mind my name being on it. I think it's better to use a real person - sorry Angus!
HB
On 27 Aug 2017, at 11:54, Matthew Reid wrote: Could we just put this in under Angus name - just to keep the heat off Heather? Does it really matter that we put the 'weight' of Director behind this?
I'm just keen that we limit any hassle that comes towards those that have been willing to put their names down as directors.
M
Sent from my iPad
From: Charlie Love
Sent: 27 August 2017 09:56
To: Matthew Reid; Diane Reid; Heather Brock;; clare davidson
Subject: Complaint about Alison Alphonse Importance: High
Comments please – this needs to go in ASAP
Thanks
Charlie
From: Charlie Love
Sent: 13 August 2016 17:52
To: Diane Reid; Heather Brock
Subject: Pre-application Forum
Hi all,
The pre-application forum is an open public session. Details below. Some of us could go along – may be a chance to hear what the councillors think and maybe even speak to some of them.
Charlie
Dear Mr Jamieson
The Pre-application Forum is held in open public session and thus members of the public are welcome to attend. The Pre-application Forum will take place on Thursday 18th August at 2.00pm. It will be held in Committee Room 2 in the Town House (entrance off Broad Street). I would advise that the Forum will be considering two matters. The proposed stadium will be the second development on the agenda. I trust this information is sufficient to meet your needs.
regards xxxxxxxxxxx
Team Leader (Development Management South) Planning and Sustainable Development | Communities, Housing and Infrastructure | Aberdeen City Council | Business Hub 4 | Ground Floor North | Marischal College | Broad Street | Aberdeen AB10 1AB Tel. (01224) 522198 General ACC Customer Contact. (03000) 200 292 Customer Feedback Survey: https://www.surveymo...uk/r/PlanningDM
Quoting this for when I'm not hammered
#4
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 10:00 PM
#5
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 10:07 PM
I like the name 'Charlie Love'. "Would you like a cup of tea Charlie ,Love ? "
limericks etc..,
#6
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 10:08 PM
It's difficult to believe anything they say or have said now. Were the supposed threats actually posted by one of their team to try and gain sympathy?
limericks etc..,
#7
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 10:15 PM
I like the name 'Charlie Love'. "Would you like a cup of tea Charlie ,Love ? "
I imagine he looks exactly like Captain Darling
Chinless insipid cunt.
#8
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 10:21 PM
Unbelievable how much effort and time these people have spent, only to become an absolute laughing stock.
#9
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 10:25 PM
People like that don't think rules or morals apply to them, it's just something that applies to everyone else.
Typical entitled idiots.
#10
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 10:55 PM
Jesus fuck, the hypocrisy of this is astounding
#11
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 10:57 PM
"We have some concerns as to the accuracy of the survey because we know that the link to the survey is being shared across football forums with many from outside the area likely completing it."
Jesus fuck, the hypocrisy of this is astounding
Exactly. " We'll only take it seriously if the results show that people agree with us"
limericks etc..,
#12
OFFLINE
Posted 13 April 2018 - 11:40 PM
Hypocrites.
Brilliant that they've been rumbled.
Any credibility they had has been shot to bits
#13
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 03:45 PM
A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.
I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.
Thoughts?
#14
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 03:47 PM
Edited by milne_afc, 15 April 2018 - 03:47 PM.
#15
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 03:48 PM
A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.
I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.
Thoughts?
On what grounds do they want it removed?
at bebo but not @ bebo
Edited by Sooper-hanz, 15 April 2018 - 03:48 PM.
limericks etc..,
#16
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 03:51 PM
On what grounds do they want it removed?
at bebo but not @ bebo
Hi there,
It has been brought to my attention that there is a thread on AFC Chat that includes various personal i.e. private and confidential emails relating to members of the No to Kingsford campaign group. These have been posted in a new thread titled ‘Fake Spokesperson Emails’. Interestingly, the thread was started by someone with the username ‘HectorMac’ on the 13 April. This user appears to be a new member who would seem to wish to post these emails anonymously, with no regard to confidentiality, data protection, etc.
I would respectfully ask you to remove these emails and thread as soon as possible from this public forum as these have been posted without the permission of any individual named in the emails.
I would appreciate your co-operation with the above.
Many thanks.
#17
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 03:51 PM
#18
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 03:52 PM
A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.
I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.
Thoughts?
I say post their request up.
#19
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 03:56 PM
A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.
I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.
Thoughts?
If Angus were real, I bet he would get his cunt kicked right in
Fortunately insults/threats against fake people aren't criminal
#20
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 03:59 PM
If Angus were real, I bet he would get his cunt kicked right in
Fortunately insults/threats against fake people aren't criminal
I wonder if Angus has a mouses ear?
Maybe @The Boofon can confirm?
#21
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:06 PM
#22
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:11 PM
I would love to see Milnes emails regarding Pittodrie and the chances of redevelopment over the years....
#23
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:17 PM
#24
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:17 PM
Fat barrels of monkey spunk.
"Maybe I will never be all the things that I want to be
But now is not the time to cry now's the time to find out why
I think you're the same as me, we see things they'll never see you and I, WE'RE GONNA LIVE FOREVER"
#25
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:22 PM
#26
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:23 PM
#27
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:51 PM
I wonder if Angus has a mouses ear?
Maybe @The Boofon can confirm?
Legally Im unable to confirm that but I suspect hes tighter than a bees nostril. 🐝
#28
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:52 PM
Yip they can get fucked. The requester that is not the emails.A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.
I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.
Thoughts?
Edited by The Boofon, 15 April 2018 - 04:52 PM.
#29
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:55 PM
Nope. Keep them up.
#30
OFFLINE
Posted 15 April 2018 - 04:57 PM
A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.
I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.
Thoughts?
I think they should be put up everywhere possible online.
0 user(s) are browsing this forum
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users