Aberdeen sack Derek McInnes

[Geoff_Tipps]

I think you're showing yourself up FnD. McLennan was fucked (cramping etc), I thought he played well but there comes a time when a player is running on empty they become a risk.

 

He was extremely lucky to escape a red card. This isn't a case of defending Mcinnes, just acknowledging the sub was 100% the correct decision

[Big Hat Logan]

It isn't. You are clinging to a good result (though we probably deserved more overall) & taking any criticism of McInnes overly personal it seems. Way too overprotective where it is not required.

 

It was a shite substitution. Simple as that. Accept it & move on

You are becoming more and more hysterical with every post. Prob best to have a lie down.

[fine-n-dandy]

I think you're showing yourself up FnD. McLennan was fucked (cramping etc), I thought he played well but there comes a time when a player is running on empty they become a risk.

He was extremely lucky to escape a red card. This isn't a case of defending Mcinnes, just acknowledging the sub was 100% the correct decision

If that was the case fair enough.

 

Doesn't in any way justify Wilson coming on though. He is a complete waste of a shirt. A fkn nae use'r.

 

Try & call it attacking if you want but It really isn't with that cunt Wilson.

 

Any one of May,Campbell, or Gleeson should have been on before Wilson (probably in that order) hell even Devlin on for set piece threat (as that was where we were causing them more problems) was worth some ridiculous consideration before putting Wilson on. Yes some would have bitched at it looking like defensive in that case though lol

[fine-n-dandy]

You are becoming more and more hysterical with every post. Prob best to have a lie down.

Do you even know the meaning of hysteria lol

 

Pathetic response (twice even)

 

The substitution was incorrect (shite) simple as that. Wilson is a bag full of doggy doodoo bags.

 

You are a pathetic happy clapper (in simple terms)

 

Still no hysteria in there. Promise I will have a lay down though once I do start to raise my pulse rate

[Chewie37]

Just calm down FnD ffs

 

[old sheep]

Absolutely nothing wrong with tactics or substitutions today. Anyone actually at the game will tell you that.

[fine-n-dandy]

Just calm down FnD ffs

I WIIIIILLL BLOODY NOOOOOOOT.

 

I HAVE EVERY FKN RIGHT TO BE HYSTERICAL & & & & dammit, I forgot the rest because I am quite  Millerly an emotional wreck

[ericblack4boss]

Very much agree with this. Jockey Scott is one of our greatest unsung heroes, who masterminded an era in which we played some of the best football in our history (and yes, I include the Fergie era in that). We were capable of giving any team in Britain a game between 1988-91 and had the Europa League set-up been as it is now, we'd have been group stage (and maybe final knockout stage) regulars.

 

Smith set the team up to defend in that fateful day and we paid the price. I don't know if that contributed to Scott walking away, but the breakup of that comanager team was the end of a great era, though admittedly Miller's first two seasons were mighty close.

[ericblack4boss]

Very much agree with this. Jockey Scott is one of our greatest unsung heroes, who masterminded an era in which we played some of the best football in our history (and yes, I include the Fergie era in that). We were capable of giving any team in Britain a game between 1988-91 and had the Europa League set-up been as it is now, we'd have been group stage (and maybe final knockout stage) regulars.

 

Smith set the team up to defend in that fateful day and we paid the price. I don't know if that contributed to Scott walking away, but the breakup of that comanager team was the end of a great era, though admittedly Miller's first two seasons were mighty close.

Jocky scott denies there was a difference of tactics in that game. Acccording to the book stand by your reds.

[Chewie37]

I WIIIIILLL BLOODY NOOOOOOOT.

I HAVE EVERY FKN RIGHT TO BE HYSTERICAL & & & & dammit, I forgot the rest because I am quite  Millerly an emotional wreck

[Hewitt a the pies]

McInnes got it spot on today. Set up perfect.

Why would anyone -1 this? 

It's fair enough to criticise him when things aren't going so well but equally you have to give him credit when he gets it right. Yesterday he was spot on.

[maryhilldon]

He got everything pretty much spot on I thought.

Yep.

[Jocky Balboa]

Jocky scott denies there was a difference of tactics in that game. Acccording to the book stand by your reds.

Fair enough, as I said I didn't have any concrete knowledge either way. What I do know, is that it was the end of an era that day, for a great AFC team was never the same again.

[boboisared]

Was it pants.

 

If you cannot improve the play by making the change don't make the change.

McLennan was playing well & they were struggling to cope with him, he was making a nuisance of himself in a good way.

Ferguson was non existent & Stewart was pretty dire if truth be told.

If any HAD to be changed it could/should have been either one of them.

 

Wilson (as I said) would probably have been the last choice to come on. Would rather put Cerny up front than that useless fk

If Candeias knew the player who caught him was MacLennan then he would have went down.

[fine-n-dandy]

If Candeias knew the player who caught him was MacLennan then he would have went down.

Not sure the relevance of this.

 

McLennan didn't get sent off. Could he have been with that challenge? Possibly.

Would he have been in the latter five minutes? Again possibly but as could any other player.

 

Wilson was the wrong sub to bring on. Every other bench player wants a crack in the team. He doesn't.

Simple as that. Wrong sub & hindsight proved as such (shouldn't have been required) as he done absolutely fk all.

[aberdeen1970]

Not sure the relevance of this.

 

McLennan didn't get sent off. Could he have been with that challenge? Possibly.

Would he have been in the latter five minutes? Again possibly but as could any other player.

 

Wilson was the wrong sub to bring on. Every other bench player wants a crack in the team. He doesn't.

Simple as that. Wrong sub & hindsight proved as such (shouldn't have been required) as he done absolutely fk all.

Are you still banging on about the Wilson sub? We didn't fail to win the game because Wilson played 5 minutes.

[fine-n-dandy]

Are you still banging on about the Wilson sub? We didn't fail to win the game because Wilson played 5 minutes.

I am replying to folk that quote me. Problem like? Care like?

 

My point is that all saying McInnes got it spot on on Sunday. I agreed he got it 'close to' spot on but not spot on.

 

Wilson is a waste of a shirt & should be nowhere near the bench/squad now.

 

I never once said it had any effect on result one way or other. Just that it was a shite substitution based on Wilsons horrendous attitude to date barring 20/30 purple patch v Livingston

[DelMonte]

Are you still banging on about the Wilson sub? We didn't fail to win the game because Wilson played 5 minutes.

As I learned way too late, no point trying to reason with the window licker. Just don't reply. The added benefit is I don't have to read his shite if it's not quoted by someone else.

[fine-n-dandy]

As I learned way too late, no point trying to reason with the window licker. Just don't reply. The added benefit is I don't have to read his shite if it's not quoted by someone else.

You didn't learn though. You still make a continuous cunt of yerself.

 

Regardless,,,, when someone quotes me, it's only polite to reply.

 

Seems strange this bothers some of you so much when you likely have me blocked 'lol' & it shouldn't really be affecting you.

[aberdeen1970]

I am replying to folk that quote me. Problem like? Care like?

 

My point is that all saying McInnes got it spit on on Sunday. I agreed he got it 'close to' spot on but not spot on.

 

Wilson is a waste of a shirt & should be nowhere near the bench/squad now.

 

I never once said it had any effect on result one way or other. Just that it was a shite substitution based on Wilsons horrendous attitude to date barring 20/30 purple patch v Livingston

Calm doon min, I don't have a problem. You can post any old shite you want.

 

Just commenting on your wildly disproportionate anger at Wilson getting 5 minutes game time when he was the most likely player on the bench to nick a goal late on.

 

Plus, the weekly bill from Man Utd is probably less if he gets on the pitch.

 

Therefore not only good tactical sense by McInnes but also sound financial sense too! If only he could stop Greg Stewart losing the ball in his own half

[fine-n-dandy]

Calm doon min, I don't have a problem. You can post any old shite you want.

Just commenting on your wildly disproportionate anger at Wilson getting 5 minutes game time when he was the most likely player on the bench to nick a goal late on.

Plus, the weekly bill from Man Utd is probably less if he gets on the pitch.

Therefore not only good tactical sense by McInnes but also sound financial sense too! If only he could stop Greg Stewart losing the ball in his own half

Another one presuming they know my emotional state lol

 

Apparently I am also not calm, angry in fact, to add to hysterical & raging.

 

Amazing.

 

The world/mind of the online forum users & shocking misreading of not only actual writing but situational/emotional awareness also

[aberdeen1970]

You might be angry, you might not be.

 

Still qualifies as a rant to me.

[fine-n-dandy]

You might be angry, you might not be.

Still qualifies as a rant to me.

Rant it can easily be classed as but only as far as replying to folk when they quote me & I stick by my refusal to accept Wilson as anything near a 'spot on' substitution

You didn't however simply class it as just a rant until now.

 

I can assure you though, I am far from angry. I am also calmness personified 99% of time (this being in the 99%)

I am also nowhere near hysterical or raging as other have been miss reading whilst I have been saying Wilson is simply a complete wasted shirt/sub.

[aberdeen1970]

Rant : speak or shout at length in an angry, impassioned way.

"he was still ranting on about the unfairness of it all"

[fine-n-dandy]

Rant : speak or shout at length in an angry, impassioned way.

"he was still ranting on about the unfairness of it all"

Again with the anger bit.

Did you grow up in a hostile household or something lol

 

Also, impassioned? Hmmmm maybe at a stretch but as I said. I feel I am just being polite enough to stick to my opinion & replying with it when folk quote me.

 

Unfairness? Nope. Didn't say/refer to that either. Shite yes, as in shite substitution.

What is the difference between me saying it was shite & other saying it was spot on. Opinions/arseholes.

 

Shite sub from an Arsehole

[aberdeen1970]

Again with the anger bit.

Did you grow up in a hostile household or something lol

 

Also, impassioned? Hmmmm maybe at a stretch but as I said. I feel I am just being polite enough to stick to my opinion & replying with it when folk quote me.

 

Unfairness? Nope. Didn't say/refer to that either. Shite yes, as in shite substitution.

What is the difference between me saying it was shite & other saying it was spot on. Opinions/arseholes.

 

Shite sub from an Arsehole

Nah, no hostility, I'm just yanking your chain.

 

If you write hundreds of ranting posts you have to expect someone to reply once in a while!

[fine-n-dandy]

Nah, no hostility, I'm just yanking your chain.

If you write hundreds of ranting posts you have to expect someone to reply once in a while!

Arrrrrghh fkn god dammit. I thought I was the one doing that.

 

 

GRRRRRRRRRR NOW AM FKN HYSTERICALLY RAGINGLY ANGRY.

[aberdeen1970]

Arrrrrghh fkn god dammit. I thought I was the one doing that.

 

 

GRRRRRRRRRR NOW AM FKN HYSTERICALLY RAGINGLY ANGRY.

Things aren't always what they seem through the looking glass.

[fine-n-dandy]

Things aren't always what they seem through the looking glass.

I know. You have spent the last half hr conversing with a Bot.

[fine-n-dandy]

I will leave it there.

 

Unless baited again, as I enjoy it