Jump to content

Ronald Hernández


Recommended Posts


1 minute ago, Fridge said:

There is something more to this. Either Cormack signed him and he was pish and he can’t really force DM to play him or sack him due to his contract or DM signed him as a massive fuck up and he is pish.

Anyway he doesn’t get a game  so I think we can conclude he is pish.

You've managed to name 2 scenarios it definitely WASN'T. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Guest milne_afc

In April 2015, FIFA announced the banning of third-party ownership, and specifically prohibited either clubs or players from entering into economic rights agreements with third-party investors. The ban took effect on 1 May 2015. The European Parliament also announced a similar ban in European sports on 11 November 2015 following the passing of Rule 136 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure. In a written declaration, the European Parliament states that third-party ownership raises concerns over the integrity of competitions and introduces risks of criminal activities into sports.

 

Hot. Water.

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, milne_afc said:

In April 2015, FIFA announced the banning of third-party ownership, and specifically prohibited either clubs or players from entering into economic rights agreements with third-party investors. The ban took effect on 1 May 2015. The European Parliament also announced a similar ban in European sports on 11 November 2015 following the passing of Rule 136 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure. In a written declaration, the European Parliament states that third-party ownership raises concerns over the integrity of competitions and introduces risks of criminal activities into sports.

 

Hot. Water.

Lets hope nobody from FIFA reads the Hat.  Mum's the word. ?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Fridge said:

There is something more to this. Either Cormack signed him and he was pish and he can’t really force DM to play him or sack him due to his contract or DM signed him as a massive fuck up and he is pish.

Anyway he doesn’t get a game  so I think we can conclude he is pish.

If Ronnie is pish how is Ojo and Main get a run out.

Thats because DM signed them and he has to save face. But we know they are both top of the pish pile

Double standards at the club

Link to comment
27 minutes ago, 4n4LprObE666 said:

Not sure if they gave us the money, as that would be too dodgy. More likely there was an agreement behind the scenes that we'd get him out of Norway, hang onto him until Atlanta had a free slot in their 'roster', then they'd buy him off us with a bit of interest on top to make it worth our while. The strategic partnership in action.

Aye, more likely.  Amounts to the same thing though. 

Link to comment
1 hour ago, maryhilldon said:

Atlanta wanted him but they'd filled their foreign player quota,  so they gave us the money to sign him.  Then once they freed up a quota place they bought him from us.  We were just a half way house. 

Correct. Loads of clubs do this type of business to see if the player they wish to recruit on a full-time basis and be a core part of their squad is any good. 

Chelsea have a similar agreement with Vitesse Arnhem, Manchester United with Royal Antwerp, and Celtic with Hibs?

Ultimately, as part of our partnership agreement with Atlanta United, what I interpret is that they were afforded first refusal on buying Ronald Hernandez from Aberdeen. No laws or rules were broken or even flexed. 

It's a new concept of trade that we will all take time to adapt to and get used to because our club hasn't had this type of partnership with another club previously. 

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...