shut up meg Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 One guy eh follow has been suspended immediately after asking Lineker to justify his wages compared to nurses. What a dumb fucking question that is . The correct question should have been how how he and Shearer managed to get that sort of screw whilst being boring aresholes. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 Mark Radcliffe should be on more than the lot of them.And Ed the duck Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 Check all the petty jealous bastards crying about other people's earnings. STFU M8sZactly.Barely a brain cell between that lot, no wonder an ex footballer earns 1000 times they do Greetin faced losers Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 Zactly.Barely a brain cell between that lot, no wonder an ex footballer earns 1000 times they do Greetin faced losers It's not how much they earn that is the issue(certainly not to me) it's the fact it's coming from the pockets of skint people in the first place. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 Regularly see motd pundit shearer. He's very down to earth Some player in his day too Link to comment
rumpus Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 Claudia winkleman is the only one earning her crust; worth every penny. Stupid name though. Sounds like Claudia Wrinkly Cock!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment
Guest milne_afc Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 I think the BBC is brilliant and would happily pay double for the licence. Peaky BlindersLine of DutyAttenborough 6 music5 liveBBC 4 That Nicholas Witchell is a proper prick, right enough. Link to comment
Poodler Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 I average 54k a year so I DGAF Link to comment
dave_min Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 I average 54k a year so I DGAFI'd rather have 1/30th a Gary Linekar. 2 Link to comment
The Village Seagull Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 I earn around 60k a year. Suck it. Link to comment
The Village Seagull Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 Soz actually meant to type 70k. Link to comment
Henry Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 It's always nurses that big wages are in comparison to. Why not bin men or grave diggers? Link to comment
360 Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 give soldgers linkarers' crisp (pay) packets # fact Link to comment
redstrummer Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 They are paying over FOUR MILLION for Chris Evans and Gary Linker alone. This is where all our TV License money is going, paying for these arseholes. I can't wait till they stop making paying a TV license compulsory (and I mean properly stop it, i.e. not sending you threatening letters, asking you to sign up for one when you buy a TV and just make a fucking menace of themselves) Evans is most most annoying cunt going , can't stand him , instant switch over whenever i hear his annoying voice Link to comment
The Village Seagull Posted July 19, 2017 Share Posted July 19, 2017 It's always nurses that big wages are in comparison to. Why not bin men or grave diggers?If I can be serious for a moment...Another buzz phrase right now is "Accommodation for key workers." Are those of us in the private sector not good enough to have such accommodation set aside for us? The housing market is pish in the North East at the moment. Plenty of affordable (compared to a few years ago) properties on the go for everyone at all levels if they choose to rent or buy. Very little need to set accommodation for certain types of employment. Link to comment
Poodler Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 If I can be serious for a moment...Another buzz phrase right now is "Accommodation for key workers." Are those of us in the private sector not good enough to have such accommodation set aside for us? The housing market is pish in the North East at the moment. Plenty of affordable (compared to a few years ago) properties on the go for everyone at all levels if they choose to rent or buy. Very little need to set accommodation for certain types of employment.If you're too stupid to understand why they need to subsidise incentives for poorer paid public service jobs then maybe you are a seagull after all. Link to comment
E-P-K Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 Soz actually meant to type 70k. You will get promoted to ruffneck soon enough. Link to comment
dave_min Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 I think he is, who is better in your opinion?Chris Evans. Link to comment
ShinnieFGS Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 I think he is, who is better in your opinion? Jonathan Sutherland Link to comment
The Village Seagull Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 If you're too stupid to understand why they need to subsidise incentives for poorer paid public service jobs then maybe you are a seagull after all.No need to descend to petty name calling. I can assure you there are far lower paid jobs than a lot of public sector jobs. It's just that with most private sector jobs you'd likely get the dunt for constantly moaning in public about pay and conditions. I'm not disagreeing with the concept of it, it just seems a bit off. The public sector needs the private sector and vice versa. Nurses earn a lot more than your average supermarket worker - where are the homes being built for Trolley Pusher Karl? I'm actually a real Seagull. 1 1 Link to comment
shut up meg Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 I think he is, who is better in your opinion? He's reading an autocue, any decent pundit could do his job for a lot less. Edit, the boy that does the Sunday lunchtime show is not too bad, I'm sure he could do it for a fraction of Linekers wage and just as well. Link to comment
shut up meg Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 No need to descend to petty name calling. I can assure you there are far lower paid jobs than a lot of public sector jobs. It's just that with most private sector jobs you'd likely get the dunt for constantly moaning in public about pay and conditions. I'm not disagreeing with the concept of it, it just seems a bit off. The public sector needs the private sector and vice versa. Nurses earn a lot more than your average supermarket worker - where are the homes being built for Trolley Pusher Karl? I'm actually a real Seagull. You were doing really well until the last line. Link to comment
dj_bollocks Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 When you compare what the likes of Sky, ITV etc are paying this is comparatively reasonable... Link to comment
Dandyesque Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 Congratulations, you've all fell for Dacre's and Murdoch's deflection tactics. Well done. +1 This is what this story is all about. Link to comment
Dandyesque Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 4 points; 1) they are all paid a damn sight less by the BBC than they could earn from SKY and the like 2) certain employees are clearly massively overpaid. I don't watch MOTD occasionally because Linekar and Shearer are on it - Shearer is actually a reason not to watch. MOTD get viewers because it shows EPL highlights. I seriously doubt Linekar makes 1 iota of difference to the viewing figures. 3) some of the women I have seen mentioned in the broadsheets are seriously underpaid in comparison to the men for the same job. Again, when it comes to programmes like Newsnight it's as much about content as it is presenters - and Emily Maitlis (sp?) is no better or worse than her male counterparts at either presenting or interviews 4) the people behind the moves to firstly publish the salaries and now condemn them are doing it for their own reasons - none of which are to do with value for money or equal pay for women- its all about removing the BBC from the competition. Lastly, if you dont get why the last point is important, you are a fuckwit and should be not just ignored but publicly shamed before being horsewhipped and dragged through the streets in your underwear, assuming you had the wherewithal to dress yourself that morning 2 Link to comment
waldo5 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Who gives a fuck what these clowns earn? This is the sort of "news" they print which upsets people the most, whilst there is plenty of real stuff to actually be worked up about. A typical distraction piece designed to appeal to the Twitter snowflakes who constantly need to feel outraged or injusticed, whilst the Gov. sneaks through some new law or simply to take the heat off some other news they'd rather keep hush. Don't pay the license fee or get rid of the television, which is the one eyed thief of time anyway. Link to comment
RAZOR Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 Jonathan Sutherland Really?To present MoTD?He's certainly got one eye on something different Link to comment
Henry Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 +1 This is what this story is all about. Congratulations, you've all fell for Dacre's and Murdoch's deflection tactics. Well done. Theresa May has been accused of an “absolute affront” to democracy after dumping dozens of official documents online on parliament’s last day of term, showing the police force numbers have dropped to a 30-year low and the number of soldiers has fallen by 7,000. The government has published very little for weeks after the election but about 22 written statements and dozens of Whitehall reports were released on Thursday, just as MPs embark on their long summer break. The tactic – known as “take out the trash day” – means MPs will not be able to scrutinise the information properly while parliament is away for the next seven weeks. The statements included a damning human rights assessment of the UK’s ally Saudi Arabia, the cancellation of the electrification of a key railway and a decision to opt into some new EU regulations on crime-fighting, even though the UK is heading for Brexit. Toby Perkins, a Labour MP, said the rush of documents released on the last day before recess was an “absolute affront to parliament”. Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 ^ seven weeks summer holiday is a fucking nonsense as well Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now