The Ryan Fraser Clause

[Donstar83]

And when you say Bournemouth are saying, you actually mean the gossip page on the bbc sport page quoting the daily record ha ha ha ha ha

 

That’s like Glitter saying Saville wasn’t a nonce

No. What I actually mean is direct quotes from their manager. Ha ha ha ha ha.

 

https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/premier-league/eddie-howe-is-playing-his-cards-right-with-ryan-fraser-amid-bournemouth-exit-speculation/

[pocrawred]

No. What I actually mean is direct quotes from their manager. Ha ha ha ha ha.

 

https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/premier-league/eddie-howe-is-playing-his-cards-right-with-ryan-fraser-amid-bournemouth-exit-speculation/

Money talks tho. Fkn hope Bournmouth sell the wee fkr for 30 mill, that would do. They only paid a training fee for him.

[boboisared]

Money talks tho. Fkn hope Bournmouth sell the wee fkr for 30 mill, that would do. They only paid a training fee for him.

No, we arranged a fee and whatever clauses to allow him to leave in January.

[Chewie37]

UN Reliable spouting off again. There will be no mega signings only left overs again. Mcinnes and Milne and company will play the same record as last season and seasons before. Promises will be MT.

  

Shoofta, do you work at Schlumberger?

 

Exactly, clubs will want Fraser on the cheap as he's out of contract in a year, if Bournemouth know they are already going to lose 20-25% then they will be keen to maximise the revenue generated.

So, lose 20-25% or get nothing at all? Makes sense

[shooftahmooftah]

 

Shoofta, do you work at Schlumberger?

 

 

So, lose 20-25% or get nothing at all? Makes sense

Nope but it' gets interesting when the female schlumberger engineers are greesing up the tools before going in the hole.

[RUL]

  

Shoofta, do you work at Schlumberger?

 

 

So, lose 20-25% or get nothing at all? Makes sense

 

I was thinking more if they say they are happy to let his deal run down then clubs might offer more. If clubs try and take advantage by offering a lower amount, of which they will lose 20% of anyway, Bournemouth might be of view they are as well keeping him.

[boboisared]

I was thinking more if they say they are happy to let his deal run down then clubs might offer more. If clubs try and take advantage by offering a lower amount, of which they will lose 20% of anyway, Bournemouth might be of view they are as well keeping him.

Look at his stats for this season. No guarantee a replacement would give them that. Bournemouth are potentially looking at it the same way we did with Cardiff and Hayes.

[aberdeen1970]

I think they'll sell and this is all posturing

[The Oxford Don]

I think they'll sell and this is all posturing

 

Aye... it's one thing for Eddie Howe to come out and say 'we're quite prepared to let his contract run down' - of course they are, in a footballing sense, because he's a really important player for them. But if someone comes in with a big bid for a lot of cash the board will be sorely tempted to take the money. 

[Chewie37]

I was thinking more if they say they are happy to let his deal run down then clubs might offer more. If clubs try and take advantage by offering a lower amount, of which they will lose 20% of anyway, Bournemouth might be of view they are as well keeping him.

  

Yeah agreed, I thought that’s what you meant, but my response was pretty vague reading it back. If they can push interest enough they’ll make enough money I suppose. Just the usual balance of how much a player is worth it to you to keep

 

Nope but it' gets interesting when the female schlumberger engineers are greesing up the tools before going in the hole.

Haha, I like dirty Shoofta

[maryhilldon]

Why?

 

They wouldn't be able to afford a replacement such are the fees, so what is the point in selling ?

Because next year they'd get nothing but still have to replace him.

[Don Fonte]

Because next year they'd get nothing but still have to replace him.

Was about to post this pretty much word for word.

 

BOOM

[Tord31]

he'll go to one of the top six this summer if they actually want him which is all speculation at this stage

[Dusk( 2 Stars )Don]

Not even sure I give a fuck ..... hope not a fuck given

[elephantstone78]

Why?

They wouldn't be able to afford a replacement such are the fees, so what is the point in selling ?

Come on.

You are better than that.

[Tord31]

clause or nae clause?

 

Liverpool and Man U join Arsenal in the race for £30M ryan fraser (daily mail)

[pocrawred]

clause or nae clause?

 

Liverpool and Man U join Arsenal in the race for £30M ryan fraser (daily mail)

In the scottish sun inna.

[Sonoftherock]

clause or nae clause?

 

Liverpool and Man U join Arsenal in the race for £30M ryan fraser (daily mail)

 

Really hope the mythical clause does exist... because there is no chance Fraser will still be at Bournemouth next season.

[super_al]

Papers are claiming there is a clause.

[Torry Tosser]

According to radio Liverpool head the queue,and there is a clause, as they stated that we could receive over £6 million of any transfer fee.

So on that lines of thinking they expecting him to go for at least £30 mill.

[alscotoz]

According to radio Liverpool head the queue,and there is a clause, as they stated that we could receive over £6 million of any transfer fee.

So on that lines of thinking they expecting him to go for at least £30 mill.

 

It would be tasty, right enough.

[eddiec]

All the more reason for us to get any transfer business done before we start to get shafted by selling clubs or even those parasite agents cos they know we're suddenly minted

[Guest]

Christmas appears to be coming for Mr Fraser.

But does Santa "Clause" really exist?

If it turns out that we have fecked up and the sell on clause was not applied to Ryan's sale would expect club to "front up" so that we spend our time writing about other shite.

However if we do ultimately end up with circa £6m credit where credit is due, regardless as how monies are spent, a really smart piece of business on the Dons part.

[Sonoftherock]

Christmas appears to be coming for Mr Fraser.

But does Santa "Clause" really exist?

If it turns out that we have fecked up and the sell on clause was not applied to Ryan's sale would expect club to "front up" so that we spend our time writing about other shite.

However if we do ultimately end up with circa £6m credit where credit is due, regardless as how monies are spent, a really smart piece of business on the Dons part.

 

This place will go into meltdown if Fraser gets sold and it emerges that we didn't insert a sell-on clause!

[dj_bollocks]

It'd be ironic after all this that we got more for Ryan Fraser than we do for McKenna...

[Torry Tosser]

It still boils down to will it go straight into the Mannie Milne's back pooch,or will a good sum be given to sign someone decent.

[Guest]

It still boils down to will it go straight into the Mannie Milne's back pooch,or will a good sum be given to sign someone decent.

I was thinking more along lines of straight to new stadium kitty or a % to transfer fund with balance to stadium kitty.

The latter would be logical, and a positive for us fans, if you're reading this SM?

[TheRock]

It'd be ironic after all this that we got more for Ryan Fraser than we do for McKenna...

Until 3 years down the line when McKenna gets sold again and he's got a sell on clause...

[CityCentre]

Papers are claiming there is a clause.

 

Got a link to any of these?

[YorkDon]

What's ironic about it?

It’s like rain on your wedding day,and a free ride when you’ve already paid