Jump to content

Livingston 1 - 2 Aberdeen (29/12)


Recommended Posts


Bench I'd say if we continue playing with two strikers which we surely must. But I think McInnes will likely stick with McGinn and GMS on the flanks as first choice picks once GMS returns which means McLennan on the bench.

 

Aye possibly.  He'll be a first team pick for sure next season though I reckon.  Even if GMS was to stay.

 

I think McGinn has seen the writing on the wall with McLennan after his recent article about wanting to play through the middle

Link to comment

I think that's harsh, McLennan looks the real deal

I never said he wasn't I said I think at this stage of his career he's more effective coming off the bench. Two of his best performances for us were when he came on from the bench (Cup final and Livi at home).

 

McLennan will be a big player for us. I agree that he is the real deal.

Link to comment

I never said he wasn't I said I think at this stage of his career he's more effective coming off the bench. Two of his best performances for us were when he came on from the bench (Cup final and Livi at home).

 

McLennan will be a big player for us. I agree that he is the real deal.

 

Who have we got that would be more effective than him from the start though?

Link to comment

Who have we got that would be more effective than him from the start though?

McGinn and GMS will i'd imagine be the regular starters once the season resumes.

 

I'm not saying McLennan shouldn't start some games he should and no doubt will. But I don't see him as an automatic starter every week either. Players with his pace, skill, directness and trickery can sometimes be more effective coming on later in the game which is why him being on the bench in some games shouldn't really be seen as a negative.

Link to comment

McGinn and GMS will i'd imagine be the regular starters once the season resumes.

 

I'm not saying McLennan shouldn't start some games he should and no doubt will. But I don't see him as an automatic starter every week either. Players with his pace, skill, directness and trickery can sometimes be more effective coming on later in the game which is why him being on the bench in some games shouldn't really be seen as a negative.

I hear you but most wingers perform better when fresh against tired full backs.

 

I think he becomes a better player quicker by starting games provided he's physically and mentally capable which I think he is.

Link to comment

I hear you but most wingers perform better when fresh against tired full backs.

 

I think he becomes a better player quicker by starting games provided he's physically and mentally capable which I think he is.

I'm just glad he's our player as he has loads of potential. His performance against Livi at home when he came in on that second half turned the game competely. The difference between his performance in the second half and the player he replaced at half-time (Wright) was night and day.

 

We have the best group of young players we've had for a long time in my opinion.

Link to comment

 

Surely no-one can suggest that the person on the right isn't interfering with play.

 

Per the FIFA presentation linked in the thread:

 

“Interfering with an opponent” means:
- Preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball. For example, by clearly obstructing the goalkeeper’s line of vision or movement.
- Making a gesture or movement which, in the opinion of the referee, deceives or distracts an opponent.
 
At no point is Hardie not moving towards the ball or Considine.  
 
Wasn't as clear cut as this one (not given as offside) was though:
 

 

 

He's not interfering with play by the interpretation of the laws today as indeed provided in your own FIFA explanation.

Link to comment

He's not interfering with play by the interpretation of the laws today as indeed provided in your own FIFA explanation.

That's fair enough tiktak.

 

But as a former referee can you explain why we so often see a player hit a shot at goal which the GK saves and the rebound then falls to a player who was standing in an offside position when the initial shot was taken (but clearly wasn't distracting the GK so therefore wasn't active). That player then knocks the ball into the net. Virtually every single time that will be flagged for offside.

Link to comment

Bench I'd say if we continue playing with two strikers which we surely must. But I think McInnes will likely stick with McGinn and GMS on the flanks as first choice picks once GMS returns which means McLennan on the bench.

I am a bit pissed and still new to sussing this geek stuff out but what about Mcginn and may switching positions 

Link to comment

That's fair enough tiktak.

 

But as a former referee can you explain why we so often see a player hit a shot at goal which the GK saves and the rebound then falls to a player who was standing in an offside position when the initial shot was taken (but clearly wasn't distracting the GK so therefore wasn't active). That player then knocks the ball into the net. Virtually every single time that will be flagged for offside.

 

That goes down as "gaining an advantage by being in that position". I know you can make the same argument in other circumstances but it then comes down to the refs interpretation of the situation. Bit like hand ball in the penalty box ie was it deliberate or not. It's not always black or white. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...