boboisared Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Steven MacLean received a retrospective ban for grabbing a tim player's baws. Morelos gets away with literally blootering them. 1 Link to comment
Reliablesource Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 The sfa are back on board with the hun.They know what they can get away with and when. Link to comment
pocrawred Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Steven MacLean received a retrospective ban for grabbing a tim player's baws. Morelos gets away with literally blootering them.A right good kick in the steens tho.... Made me laff. Link to comment
aberdeen1970 Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 In other Scottish football governance news it appears that the Scottish Championship teams might have seen through the ruse that is the proposed 5th division. Apparently they have been told that "old firm colt teams" will be allowed to be promoted to Championship level under the proposals and are going to vote against. Good. 1 Link to comment
Just Dandy Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Thing is though, if the authorities send the message that a particular player simply won't be punished, then that player's opponents know that matters have been left in their own hands. Sevs had best be selling Morelos this window - he's a marked man now, and imo it's only a matter of time before he gets done properly. Link to comment
AllyDon Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 In other Scottish football governance news it appears that the Scottish Championship teams might have seen through the ruse that is the proposed 5th division. Apparently they have been told that "old firm colt teams" will be allowed to be promoted to Championship level under the proposals and are going to vote against. Good. 100% agree. The 5th division was never being set up for the benifit of Scottish Football, but to allow the ugly sisters to bring in Colt Teams. Link to comment
pocrawred Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 100% agree. The 5th division was never being set up for the benifit of Scottish Football, but to allow the ugly sisters to bring in Colt Teams.Nothing surer, the fifth division will most likely go ahead. No matter what the chairmen of the spfl lower leagues vote. Link to comment
Proud Dandy Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 From the bbc article on Morelos; “But all three incidents were seen in their entirety by match referee John Beaton so no retrospective action can take place on this basis.” Can someone explain how McKenna therefore got a retrospective ban for his challenge against Celtic when the referee was looking directly at the incident? 1 Link to comment
NEM Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Surely Beaton is admitting his incompetence and will be sacked then? Link to comment
pocrawred Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Just watched sportscene on bbci player and ref gollam booked the st mirren player for the intentional stamp on the back on the killie player. Double standards as per... Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Just watched sportscene on bbci player and ref gollam booked the st mirren player for the intentional stamp on the back on the killie player. Double standards as per...Saw that one too. And you can bet your bottom dollar Thompson and Stewart were told not to flag it up. Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 What’s that you say? The two games he’d have missed were against 3rd placed Killie and fourth placed us? Link to comment
Reliablesource Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 From the bbc article on Morelos; “But all three incidents were seen in their entirety by match referee John Beaton so no retrospective action can take place on this basis.” Can someone explain how McKenna therefore got a retrospective ban for his challenge against Celtic when the referee was looking directly at the incident?And gave the foul iirc. Link to comment
shut up meg Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Morelos won't receive any retrospective action after the huns v tims game The SFA and SPFL are surely trolling the country now. Link to comment
pocrawred Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 WE NEED A BIG FUCK OFF ‘FUCK THE SFA’ BANNER FOR THE STENNY GAME...... Link to comment
Shinniesta Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/john-beaton-forced-call-police-13814574.amp Oh dear. Link to comment
aberdeen1970 Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 They're idiots obviously but this is what happens if you're not even handed and fair Link to comment
V for Vendetta Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 It’s the justification I like. Because referee John Beaton saw the incidents at the time and took no action then no retrospective action could or will be taken. I’m so glad they’ve cleared that up.It's a hopelessly shit and utterly see through reason. The concept that what a referee apparently sees or doesn't see overalls what anyone else can see is utterly nefarious and stupid and complete my intangible. It's the biggest get out of jail free card ever and allows absolutely anything they want to go unscrutinoused and unpunished for the rest of time. Completely illogical rule as well as it happens. Link to comment
OddJob Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 Saw that yesterday on Facebook. Is that even Beaton tho? Tbh even if it is I’m shocked they’re so surprised as well known he was a season ticket holder at that lot. Funnily enough I didn’t realise again until yesterday that he was the ref for the game we beat them with Maddison’s free kick and the bread maker lost the plot with him at end of the match ha ha Link to comment
Ramandu Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 What are the chances of Defoe getting a retrospective sanction for the blatant dive yesterday? It seems like they just act on incidents which are being moaned about in the papers, which means incidents that have disadvantaged one of the cheeks. Link to comment
BWG Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 What are the chances of Defoe getting a retrospective sanction for the blatant dive yesterday?It seems like they just act on incidents which are being moaned about in the papers, which means incidents that have disadvantaged one of the cheeks.None because Andrew Dallas, the professional that he is, asked him if he dived and he said no. No further action required. Link to comment
Site Sponsor Dom Sullivan Posted February 3, 2019 Site Sponsor Share Posted February 3, 2019 Watched the highlights on Sportscene. Dallas had a complete shocker. And what action will the powers that be take against one of Scotland's "finest"? SFA Link to comment
Ramandu Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Never bothered watching sportscene. Did the pundits at least give him some stick? Link to comment
Site Sponsor Dom Sullivan Posted February 3, 2019 Site Sponsor Share Posted February 3, 2019 Never bothered watching sportscene. Did the pundits at least give him some stick?Michael Stewart did. Hun Thompson not so much Link to comment
caledonia Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Michael Stewart did. Hun Thompson not so muchEven he admitted some were not penaltys and Michael Stewart said only 2 were but that was including 1 that was NOT given Watching sportscene one was a blatent dive and two were outside the boxFirst was a stonewaller though Link to comment
OddJob Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Even he admitted some were not penaltys and Michael Stewart said only 2 were but that was including 1 that was NOT givenWatching sportscene one was a blatent dive and two were outside the boxFirst was a stonewaller thoughAye the 1st pen was the only correct decision for the 4 awarded. Link to comment
Shinniesta Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Michael Stewart didn't hold back when talking about Dallas.Said he's become a soap opera. Nice to see at least one pundit say it as it is. 1 Link to comment
Ramandu Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Good, one right out of four is terrible. And I heard some nonsense about the second not being a dive because he didn't claim for it? It was as clear a dive as you will ever see. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now