shooftahmooftah Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 28 minutes ago, frankie_mac's_4 said: The issue is he's been through the justice system, now a sitting head of government is undermining that system and publicly compromising his right to seek employment. As I said the other day its fucking scandalous The nodding donkey so called head of government is a Me Too Gay supporter women's liber, and an irritating nasty little squirt. And is still under investigation for funds that went missing and diverted by her bald headed mouthy husband and the Natzi party. The little agitator needs putting in her or his place whatever her or his sex. Link to comment
perthshirered Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 47 minutes ago, shooftahmooftah said: They should ban female soccer teams, they are full of butches and bitches and the Me Too brigade, Same goes for female rugby teams etc etc . Goodwille got caught paid the fine , now being hounded for life. What about the rest who’s going around that havnt been caught, yet. Aye, that Christian Ramirez needs to get to buck up his ideas. The goals have dried up and he husnae even raped anyone yet. Get him tae fuck. Link to comment
Parklife Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 1 hour ago, shooftahmooftah said: They should ban female soccer teams, they are full of butches and bitches and the Me Too brigade, Same goes for female rugby teams etc etc . Goodwille got caught paid the fine , now being hounded for life. What about the rest who’s going around that havnt been caught, yet. 22 minutes ago, shooftahmooftah said: The nodding donkey so called head of government is a Me Too Gay supporter women's liber, and an irritating nasty little squirt. And is still under investigation for funds that went missing and diverted by her bald headed mouthy husband and the Natzi party. The little agitator needs putting in her or his place whatever her or his sex. Lol. Link to comment
NEM Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Ten Caat said: I've tried to enquire about this for the NHS. Senior manager says no, it's only criminal convictions that have to be disclosed Opening yourself up to suspicion there TC ? 2 Link to comment
Ten Caat Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 43 minutes ago, NEM said: Opening yourself up to suspicion there TC ? At my age the mind is willing but the body is weak Anyway was waiting on the second person I asked to return call....a human resources manager She concurs with the nurse manager that legally all Goodwillie would have to disclose is any criminal conviction. So the civil court findings don't matter as regards an application to work within the NHS HOWEVER The case has become so widely publicised, that it is questionable whether employing such a notorious person would be conducive to retaining the reputation of the NHS and so his application could be rejected on those grounds. Plus.....If he were to be employed it would be almost impossible in pretty much any role that he could fill that he wouldn't come into contact with female staff. They could (theoretically) reasonably say that they don't feel safe working beside such a man. This brings Health and Safety at Work into play and so his application or employment could be rejected on those grounds. Link to comment
shooftahmooftah Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 6 minutes ago, Ten Caat said: At my age the mind is willing but the body is weak Anyway was waiting on the second person I asked to return call....a human resources manager She concurs with the nurse manager that legally all Goodwillie would have to disclose is any criminal conviction. So the civil court findings don't matter as regards an application to work within the NHS HOWEVER The case has become so widely publicised, that it is questionable whether employing such a notorious person would be conducive to retaining the reputation of the NHS and so his application could be rejected on those grounds. Plus.....If he were to be employed it would be almost impossible in pretty much any role that he could fill that he wouldn't come into contact with female staff. They could (theoretically) reasonably say that they don't feel safe working beside such a man. This brings Health and Safety at Work into play and so his application or employment could be rejected on those grounds. If that was the case the rigs in the North Sea would be shut down. And left with Females running them. ??? Link to comment
Parklife Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 1 hour ago, shooftahmooftah said: If that was the case the rigs in the North Sea would be shut down. And left with Females running them. ??? A lot of rapists work on the rigs like? Link to comment
beef_sister Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 3 hours ago, dazzy_deff said: So given he can walk into any other career, why is Nicola Sturgeon sticking her beak in. Therein lies the issue...he's never been convicted of anything. Because she's a fucking cow who likes to jump on any bandwagon / crusade that she feels will garner her support from the lunatics that follow the SNP She needs volleyed in the face repeatedly 2 Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 Typical politician at the moment can give us a definitive opinion on something that’s nothing to do with them! But ask them a question about policing/nhs/schooling it’s waffle and deflection. Country being run into the ground with Covid the perfect excuse for abject failure of policies or ideas 1 Link to comment
shooftahmooftah Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 37 minutes ago, Parklife said: A lot of rapists work on the rigs like? Well there's been hundreds of collapsed holes over the years and blow outs. ?? Link to comment
Dandyesque Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 For those asking, a woman can't be convicted of rape of a man in Scotland as the the Common Law definition is "...forcibly inserting his male member...". It could be a sexual assault. A woman can ironically be convicted of forcible insertion of her male member if she helps a man rape another woman (eg Fred and Rose West) as if convicted "art and part" you are convicted of exactly the same offence as the principal protagonist. Link to comment
Dons79 Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 Did Gallagher not get guilty by a court of law, serve time? not heard his apologies over the incident of assault or remorse? tried to overturn his conviction as well Link to comment
Ke1t Posted February 4, 2022 Author Share Posted February 4, 2022 9 hours ago, Parklife said: David Martindale is a fine example of how someone can be rehabilitated. Openly speaks of his regret and remorse and has turned his life around. We all make mistakes. David Martindale has paid for his, accepted them, learned from them and reformed his life. Goodwillie has denied his, legally fought against attempts to make him pay and then declared himself bankrupt to avoid paying damages. Maybe he is, in fact, innocent? 1 2 Link to comment
Dons79 Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 As a matter of fact Gallagher wouldn’t be able to get any job that entailed an advanced disclosure!, rules him out for any security industry job(SIA) automatic refusal from the home office, not exactly a great role model himself that we signed seen as there are under groups of kids at the club.why is he here?.why is that acceptable? Link to comment
Parklife Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Ke1t said: Maybe he is, in fact, innocent? Goodwillie? Maybe. However the evidence presented in the civil trial looks pretty damning. 1 Link to comment
thurso Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 7 minutes ago, Parklife said: Goodwillie? Maybe. However the evidence presented in the civil trial looks pretty damning. What was the evidence that was so damning in the civil trial but he couldn’t of been prosecuted in a criminal trial and found guilty Link to comment
perthshirered Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, thurso said: What was the evidence that was so damning in the civil trial but he couldn’t of been prosecuted in a criminal trial and found guilty You don't know the difference between of and have. Maybe best you left the legal stuff alone. 4 Link to comment
Parklife Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 21 minutes ago, perthshirered said: You don't know the difference between of and have. Maybe best you left the legal stuff alone. Haha. Link to comment
perthshirered Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 5 hours ago, The Gee Man said: Typical politician at the moment can give us a definitive opinion on something that’s nothing to do with them! But ask them a question about policing/nhs/schooling it’s waffle and deflection. Country being run into the ground with Covid the perfect excuse for abject failure of policies or ideas The passage above is proof that Sturgeon has a lot to answer for. The grammar is absolutely disgraceful. You slag off education then produce something like that. Jesus Christ. Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 1 minute ago, perthshirered said: The passage above is proof that Sturgeon has a lot to answer for. The grammar is absolutely disgraceful. Wise up Link to comment
perthshirered Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 1 minute ago, The Gee Man said: Wise up I'm of the impression that you are the one who needs to brush up on their wisdom. Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, perthshirered said: I'm of the impression that you are the one who needs to brush up on their wisdom. What a tool Link to comment
NEM Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 42 minutes ago, perthshirered said: You don't know the difference between of and have. Maybe best you left the legal stuff alone. *leave 5 Link to comment
perthshirered Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 4 minutes ago, The Gee Man said: What a tool I've a spare full stop kicking about here. . Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 1 minute ago, perthshirered said: I've a spare full stop kicking about here. . Grammar Police ?♀️ Link to comment
perthshirered Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 2 minutes ago, NEM said: *leave No. Left is appropriate as he has already said it. Are you a mongol? 2 Link to comment
NEM Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, perthshirered said: No. Left is appropriate as he has already said it. Are you a mongol? Missing an “if” then surely? Grammar pedantry on a message board though. Are you as big a fud in the real world? Link to comment
perthshirered Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 2 minutes ago, NEM said: Missing an “if” then surely? Grammar pedantry on a message board though. Are you as big a fud in the real world? I wouldn't have thought so. Link to comment
Redmist1903 Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 Dean Campbell stinking out Gayfield Park. Link to comment
perthshirered Posted February 4, 2022 Share Posted February 4, 2022 3 minutes ago, NEM said: Missing an “if” then surely? Grammar pedantry on a message board though. Are you as big a fud in the real world? What's worse than grammar pedantry on a message board? My guess would be attempting grammar pedantry on a message board. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now