Coronavirus

[Matt Armstrong's Dog]

11 minutes ago, Joe pike said:

Almost like Sturgeon makes things up.

Very true. 

Prior to my older mate contracting the virus, I was on dogwalking duties on behalf of my sister as she and the rest of her family, at different times, had each tested positive for the virus, therefore were all self-isolating, so naturally couldn't go out and walk their border collie. 

On one occasion after walking their dog, I nipped up by to see another mate of mine out in his backie (he has COPD (he smokes approx. 60 ticklers a day) therefore is more susceptible to catching the virus than others if believing our governments). He was less than impressed with me, after a week of festering after my visit, as he was "scared" of contracting the virus from the dog?. 

I therefore made the point of sending away for a PCR testing kit the following day to alleviate his "concerns", and ultimately tested negative.

Surely, after all of this, I should have been contacted by Test and Protect, unless I am missing something here, and the RSCPA should have impounded the poor dog for a number of days, if indeed my mate is correct and he could have caught the virus from the canine?

 

 

 

 

[Don Fonte]

7 minutes ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said:

Very true. 

Prior to my older mate contracting the virus, I was on dogwalking duties on behalf of my sister as she and the rest of her family, at different times, had each tested positive for the virus, therefore were all self-isolating, so naturally couldn't go out and walk their border collie. 

On one occasion after walking their dog, I nipped up by to see another mate of mine out in his backie (he has COPD (he smokes approx. 60 ticklers a day) therefore is more susceptible to catching the virus than others if believing our governments). He was less than impressed with me, after a week of festering after my visit, as he was "scared" of contracting the virus from the dog?. 

I therefore made the point of sending away for a PCR testing kit the following day to alleviate his "concerns", and ultimately tested negative.

Surely, after all of this, I should have been contacted by Test and Protect, unless I am missing something here, and the RSCPA should have impounded the poor dog for a number of days, if indeed my mate is correct and he could have caught the virus from the canine?

 

 

 

 

Have you been drinking?

[Redforever86]

It’s quite simple the bar keeps the sheets, if someone tests positive they contact test and protect who then contact the bar for the information.

 

Just because you have met someone doesn’t mean you are a close contact has to be a certain amount of time face you face etc.

 

Im not saying it’s a great system or it’s run well but that is the basic theory.

 

[Matt Armstrong's Dog]

20 minutes ago, Don Fonte said:

Have you been drinking?

Why do you ask min?

Been dry for 4 days.

[Matt Armstrong's Dog]

13 minutes ago, Redforever86 said:

It’s quite simple the bar keeps the sheets, if someone tests positive they contact test and protect who then contact the bar for the information.

 

Just because you have met someone doesn’t mean you are a close contact has to be a certain amount of time face you face etc.

 

Im not saying it’s a great system or it’s run well but that is the basic theory.

 

That's fair enough and well explained min. 

Just was led to reasonably believe that the whole purpose of taking down your contact details was for Test and Protect to alert you to the fact you have been in close contact with someone who had tested positive in the last few days and to then advise accordingly on what you had to do thereafter.

My misinterpretation. 

[Fridge]

1 hour ago, Redforever86 said:

It’s quite simple the bar keeps the sheets, if someone tests positive they contact test and protect who then contact the bar for the information.

 

Just because you have met someone doesn’t mean you are a close contact has to be a certain amount of time face you face etc.

 

Im not saying it’s a great system or it’s run well but that is the basic theory.

 

Well that is very well put but it doesn’t happen as I was out during the outbreak in Aberdeen and nobody contacted me despite being checked in and sitting with folk that had it (whom obviously none of us knew at the time had it)

[maryhilldon]

2 hours ago, manboobs109 said:

Yip and they were correct to do so. Ones who were lonely and would've loved a perfectly healthy loved one in to visit should not have been barred by law though. It was cruel and unnecessary.

My 72 year old mum lives across the road from me on her own,  there was no chance I wasn't going to visit her for months on end.  She was happy for me to visit  (got me to sanitise my hands when I arrived,  initially),  indeed she's told me she would've struggled to get through lockdown without my visits. 

[maryhilldon]

3 hours ago, Sooper-hanz said:

? I read a quote from someone that said   "I used to cough to mask the sound a of a fart, now I fart to mask the sound of a cough"   

 

I lol'd at this. 

?. I like that,  mind if I use it? 

[maryhilldon]

2 minutes ago, Sooper-hanz said:

Its not mine Mhd. Feel free. 

?

[Bluto10]

20 minutes ago, maryhilldon said:

My 72 year old mum lives across the road from me on her own,  there was no chance I wasn't going to visit her for months on end.  She was happy for me to visit  (got me to sanitise my hands when I arrived,  initially),  indeed she's told me she would've struggled to get through lockdown without my visits. 

christ. she was young when she had you!

 

?

[maryhilldon]

3 minutes ago, Roberto said:

The MHD on Twitter isn't the same one who posts on here...

Hanz knows the older MHD,  they used to use the same supporters bus. Unlike me he's from Aberdeen. 

[Bluto10]

3 minutes ago, Roberto said:

The MHD on Twitter isn't the same one who posts on here...

I was jesting by his grumpiness

nae sure about twitter.

 

[maryhilldon]

1 minute ago, Bluto10 said:

I was jesting by his grumpiness

nae sure about twitter.

 

I'm not grumpy ye prick. 

[Bluto10]

2 minutes ago, maryhilldon said:

I'm not grumpy ye prick. 

?

 

 

[Redforever86]

35 minutes ago, Fridge said:

Well that is very well put but it doesn’t happen 

I never said it did, I just said that's how it's meant to work. 

 

Two people who work with me (although not at close distance a lot however) both tested positive and passed on my details never heard fuck all from them thankfully. 

[maryhilldon]

7 minutes ago, Sooper-hanz said:

Could even be giving your mum a portion Mhd, if you dont mind my saying so. 

I do mind,  actually. 

[maryhilldon]

38 minutes ago, Bad_Mobby said:

I was up your neck of the woods for my run this morning MHD

was scanning the pavements for a Brick Top lookalike 

what likes the Brewhaus on Queen Margaret Drive?

My local,  there now.  Cracking big beer garden,  shite pool table upstairs. 

[manboobs109]

 

[RedArmyFakshun]

^   is great that he's saying what he's saying

but the buff round the neck look doesn't work too well in the summer

unless you're covering up for an ill-advised suicide attempt

[manboobs109]

Do you think he's got a big cock?

[RedArmyFakshun]

its an interesting evolution of character

GB News must have hired him for being a jock unionist voice

but he's warming to the national platform and gone off piste

[RedArmyFakshun]

he needs more work on his autocue reading finesse, certainly

[RedArmyFakshun]

a word from our sponsor, the prophet russell

 

[Parklife]

Neil Oliver again. GB news again. 

From a guy who's calling others "spackers"  

Class. 

[manboobs109]

Do you disagree with him Parky?

[Parklife]

I didn't watch. He's not worth listening to. The last two you've posted I've watched and they were utter shite. Ill-informed nonsense & empty soundbites. As I told you at the time  

I can see how it'd appeal to some. It's utter shite though. 

I suspect this is the same. 

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, can't put the blame on you. Fool me three times, fuck the peace signs, load the chopper let it rain on you. 

[manboobs109]

1 minute ago, Parklife said:

I didn't watch. He's not worth listening to. The last two you've posted I've watched and they were utter shite. Ill-informed nonsense & empty soundbites. As I told you at the time  

I can see how it'd appeal to some. It's utter shite though. 

I suspect this is the same. 

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, can't put the blame on you. Fool me three times, fuck the peace signs, load the chopper let it rain on you. 

It's amazing how much he annoys you. For that he deserves praise.

[manboobs109]

Annoying the right people is always a good thing. If he bugs self important drips like you he's doing something right.

[Parklife]

1 minute ago, manboobs109 said:

It's amazing how much he annoys you. For that he deserves praise.

If that's your barometer for "praise" then you give that out very easily. 

[RedArmyFakshun]

3 minutes ago, Parklife said:

If that's your barometer

i'm right into this barometer malarky this year

when the air pressure is at 29.7 whatevs, i can cycle an easy average of 25.9 kmph

my theory is the weight of air molecules offers less resistance

others disagree