The Boofon Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 26 minutes ago, minijc said: I'm just glad he had the foresight to apply for an exemption by the 10th of December, know he'd later test positive. Hahaha Link to comment
NEM Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 3 hours ago, Parklife said: Still likely that he'll have his visa cancelled at the personal discretion of the minister for immigration, according to what I've read. Novak Djokovic: Tennis star wins court battle to stay in Australia - BBC News "The immigration minister had four hours after the judge's decision to decide whether to re-cancel Djokovic's visa while the player was in detention; that time has now elapsed meaning he is free to leave" Link to comment
Parklife Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 9 minutes ago, NEM said: Novak Djokovic: Tennis star wins court battle to stay in Australia - BBC News "The immigration minister had four hours after the judge's decision to decide whether to re-cancel Djokovic's visa while the player was in detention; that time has now elapsed meaning he is free to leave" Yeah but his visa can be cancelled at any time. The current reports are that the minister will decide tomorrow. Link to comment
Guest Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 Old Djoko should just think positively. That'll change his predicament, like it does the water... Link to comment
Parklife Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 48 minutes ago, minijc said: I'm just glad he had the foresight to apply for an exemption by the 10th of December, know he'd later test positive. Knew the Serbian government would give him documentation saying he'd tested positive, I'd guess... Link to comment
Guest Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 To be quite honest I would be totally behind the guy if his stance was to challenge the rules that are unfair and coercive to the unvaxxed population. But, I think he's trying to challenge the rules for his own personal gain, to further his own career. Therein, for me, lies the difference for sympathy and no sympathy. Link to comment
Hoofball Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 1 minute ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: Old Djoko should just think positively. That'll change his predicament, like it does the water... As long as he isn’t holding bread whilst doing the thinking it should work Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 1 hour ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: Not getting the folk supporting him. The rules are a farce, I'm in agreement with that, it's even more farcical if they don't apply them to the fullest extent for a sportsperson/celebrity. You can be against the rules, which I am, but also be for him getting the same treatment as Joe Bloggs. The rules have been applied. It's a political decision to stop him. Link to comment
NEM Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, Parklife said: Yeah but his visa can be cancelled at any time. The current reports are that the minister will decide tomorrow. They're going to look pretty stupid if they cancel it now, more so than they do already Link to comment
NEM Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: To be quite honest I would be totally behind the guy if his stance was to challenge the rules that are unfair and coercive to the unvaxxed population. But, I think he's trying to challenge the rules for his own personal gain, to further his own career. Therein, for me, lies the difference for sympathy and no sympathy. Ah the politics of envy - I am shocked Link to comment
Guest Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 2 minutes ago, manboobs109 said: The rules have been applied. It's a political decision to stop him. The rules of the federal government? Or the regional? I think that's where it's tricky. Link to comment
Henry Posted January 10, 2022 Author Share Posted January 10, 2022 2 hours ago, Parklife said: Unfortunately for you, it's you who is struggling Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 5 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: To be quite honest I would be totally behind the guy if his stance was to challenge the rules that are unfair and coercive to the unvaxxed population. But, I think he's trying to challenge the rules for his own personal gain, to further his own career. Therein, for me, lies the difference for sympathy and no sympathy. Bit unfair, he's a tennis player who wants to play in a tournament not a politician. Link to comment
Guest Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 1 minute ago, NEM said: Ah the politics of envy - I am shocked What am I being envious about? Link to comment
Guest Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 4 minutes ago, NEM said: They're going to look pretty stupid if they cancel it now, more so than they do already Can't possibly look as stupid as a guy who thinks you can change water with positive thoughts They'll probs be ok Link to comment
Guest Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 2 minutes ago, manboobs109 said: Bit unfair, he's a tennis player who wants to play in a tournament not a politician. He's a millionaire who wants to be exempt from rules that would apply to abdy else. Link to comment
NEM Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 1 minute ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: What am I being envious about? You want rules which you've admitted you think are farcical applied to him because he's a millionaire tennis player. Link to comment
Guest Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 1 minute ago, NEM said: You want rules which you've admitted you think are farcical applied to him because he's a millionaire tennis player. No, I want rules that are applied to non millionaires to also be applied to millionaires. Link to comment
NEM Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 Just now, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: No, I want rules that are applied to non millionaires to also be applied to millionaires. If you think they're farcical you shouldn't want them applied to anyone. As I said - the politics of envy. Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 12 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: He's a millionaire who wants to be exempt from rules that would apply to abdy else. The judge said he'd followed the rules Link to comment
Parklife Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 48 minutes ago, minijc said: I'm just glad he had the foresight to apply for an exemption by the 10th of December, know he'd later test positive. Knew the Serbian government would give him documentation saying he'd tested positive, I'd guess... Link to comment
Parklife Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 19 minutes ago, NEM said: They're going to look pretty stupid if they cancel it now, more so than they do already I would say it's quite the opposite. Link to comment
Parklife Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 2 minutes ago, manboobs109 said: The judge said he'd followed the rules Did he? Link to comment
NEM Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 2 minutes ago, Parklife said: I would say it's quite the opposite. You don't say! Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 5 minutes ago, Parklife said: Did he? Yes Link to comment
1903Fitba Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 Tennis is for poofters. Argument ended. 2 Link to comment
Guest Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 55 minutes ago, NEM said: If you think they're farcical you shouldn't want them applied to anyone. As I said - the politics of envy. I don't wasn't them applied at anyone. The reality is tho- that they are. And if we accept that reality as it is, then the rules should be applied. Fuck all to do with envy. Link to comment
NEM Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 2 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: I don't wasn't them applied at anyone. The reality is tho- that they are. And if we accept that reality as it is, then the rules should be applied. Fuck all to do with envy. Lol as I said, strange logic Link to comment
manboobs109 Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 10 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said: I don't wasn't them applied at anyone. The reality is tho- that they are. And if we accept that reality as it is, then the rules should be applied. Fuck all to do with envy. They have been applied, the judge said so. The ozzies are just getting nippy coz there's an election coming up. He's being made an example of, it's as simple as that. Link to comment
Parklife Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 1 hour ago, manboobs109 said: Yes Can you show me where as I can't see him saying that? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now