Jump to content

Calvin Ramsay


Recommended Posts


15 minutes ago, Millertime said:

Here's a stat

Patterson averages a goal at club level every 11.5 games and national level 1 in 7

Ramsay averages 0 in both

& Patterson has been played in more advanced roles (as right winger) at times in both club & National levels because of his defensive weaknesses. 
 

Ramsay hasn’t had this luxury & is expected to do the complete full back role.

 

Also how do their assists stats compare? Which is far more important than the odd goal for FB’s

Link to comment
22 minutes ago, Millertime said:

Here's a stat

Patterson averages a goal at club level every 11.5 games and national level 1 in 7

Ramsay averages 0 in both

Shay Logan (until his last season with us getting games) averaged a goal every 11 games. Whilst Logan wasn’t good enough to get caps for England to boost his international stats v Moldova & Faroe isles etc. ?
 

FB’s chipping in with the odd goal is a bonus yes but a FB’s most important duty is to defend & assist in attacks/goals

 

Patterson has played as winger for both Scotland & Sevco at times also

Link to comment

 

48 minutes ago, afc1903mad said:

Its a great deal for their back-up, but there will come a time in the next season or two that they will need to consider a replacement RB / RWB.

It seems like GVB may have already been looking to accommodate with Tavernier playing in a back 3 and Patterson further forward, but they now need to look at alternatives.

How much of the £12M will they need to spend to get a replacement in.

 

They have a young loon called Adam Devine, but he's older than Ramsay and behind him in terms of playing through the Scottish Youth Internationals i.e. Ramsay has played up ahead of the boy Devine.

So straight off, their succession plan is weaker

Ex sevconian Alex Rae quoting tonight on the tranny that it's £9million up front with another £1million per year over the next 4 years based on making a set minimum amount of appearances per year and a possible further £3 million in bonus payments based on other achievements

Link to comment
Just now, Ten Caat said:

 

Ex sevconian Alex Rae quoting tonight on the tranny that it's £9million up front with another £1million per year over the next 4 years based on making a set minimum amount of appearances per year and a possible further £3 million in bonus payments based on other achievements

 

It'll be quoted as 16m for ever more though. 

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, Geoff_Tipps said:

What's with the Rangers player debate, why are so many of our fans obsessed with Rangers? Fucking embarrassing.

They are all cunts and that's all that needs said. 

Because they have just sold a pretty similar (but not as good) young RB to what we have & we are likely in process of selling ours. Do you not think this will generate comparisons chat? 
 

You are potentially the one than is making it about ‘Sevco’ by making out it isn’t about the genuine comparisons with actual players.

 

If it was Hearts that just sold Patterson we would be still discussing Patterson & Hearts ? but MT isn’t as much a Hearts cunt so he wouldn’t be contributing as much admittedly

Link to comment
  • Site Sponsor
2 hours ago, Millertime said:

Well, yeah they needed 7m to get to the end of the season

4.5 though has been gotten from Gerrard leaving

We need them to not win the league this season as the champs league money will officially mean they are back

Back??

I know you’re fishing Frankie but Rangers died on 14 February 2012 as you well know.

New club, admitted to the league without the proper credentials, as you well know.

Impossible to be “back”.

 

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, Ten Caat said:

 

Ex sevconian Alex Rae quoting tonight on the tranny that it's £9million up front with another £1million per year over the next 4 years based on making a set minimum amount of appearances per year and a possible further £3 million in bonus payments based on other achievements

Who to believe then?

Other sources said the add-ons were reduced to provide a more up front fee

Link to comment

Back on subject of what we could/should accept for Ramsay. 
My humble opinion would be £6-7m Now minimum.  Loan back for remainder of season & at least a 20% sell on (not up for negotiations downwards) & also add ons for international caps & then appearances for new club from next season. 
 

I do not think that is unreasonable from either side.

 

Add in European appearances add ons depending on buying clubs potential for qualifying for European football. Possibly also add ons for assists if he gets 10+ in a season at new club ?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Dom Sullivan said:

Back??

I know you’re fishing Frankie but Rangers died on 14 February 2012 as you well know.

New club, admitted to the league without the proper credentials, as you well know.

Impossible to be “back”.

 

I didn't mean the club, just their financial position,  to clarify

They need director loans season on season to survive, Patterson money and 30m for champs league would have them financially sorted

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Millertime said:

Qualifying for the automatic champs league is all they care about

They have received 10 to 16m and it hasn't remotely weakened their first team

Incredible business 

It has you know?, can tavernier not get injured?,so while selling one of there prised assets,one for the future while the green Huns strengthen hasn’t got any relevance for future title wins?including this season as it’s only the winner that gets automatic qualification. There banking on them winning this title, not exactly great business acumen is it?, closing their eyes and hoping?

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Dons79 said:

It has you know?, can tavernier not get injured?,so while selling one of there prised assets,one for the future while the green Huns strengthen hasn’t got any relevance for future title wins?including this season as it’s only the winner that gets automatic qualification. There banking on them winning this title, not exactly great business acumen is it?, closing their eyes and hoping?

Worked pretty well for then with their euro run last season 

Link to comment
30 minutes ago, Millertime said:

You don't think 40m would have them on an even keel financially?

It depends really.

with net current liabilities of a tad over £40m as of June last year, and in all likelihood growing in scale since then, champions league prize money plus 10m assuming no significant outlays this transfer window, would in all likelihood put them on an even keel in the short term.

with a business model that has accrued net losses of £87m since roughly 2012, then it’s a model that needs year on year champions league group cash to sustain the business really….or to sell 1-2 Pattersons each year….depending on how much they want to reinvest in transfer cash.

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Watson Oh The Bar! Scanlon Yes! said:

It depends really.

with net current liabilities of a tad over £40m as of June last year, and in all likelihood growing in scale since then, champions league prize money plus 10m assuming no significant outlays this transfer window, would in all likelihood put them on an even keel in the short term.

with a business model that has accrued net losses of £87m since roughly 2012, then it’s a model that needs year on year champions league group cash to sustain the business really….or to sell 1-2 Pattersons each year….depending on how much they want to reinvest in transfer cash.

Yeah but surely that is their model

Do what celtic do

Sell a van dijk,  edouard,  Tierney every year 

The problem they and celtic have is wanting to be champions league clubs, like those in England but they don't have the TV money English clubs have 

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, Millertime said:

Yeah but surely that is their model

Do what celtic do

Sell a van dijk,  edouard,  Tierney every year 

The problem they and celtic have is wanting to be champions league clubs, like those in England but they don't have the TV money English clubs have 

There’s huge pressure on those two to access champions league cash that’s for sure given the massive difference in tv income.

celtic budget much more conservatively, sometimes to the consternation of their fans and stakeholders, generally budgeting for final place in the Europa league and the comparative crumbs that leaves vs champions league. 

that has left celtic in a decent position financially, with net current liabilities of c£5m in June last year.

rangers by comparison had to gamble to stop 10 in a row. They’ve done that and achieved what they needed to do in the short term, but it leaves them in a position where they need to roll some sixes for the next 3-4 years.

the other answer is fresh equity.

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, Millertime said:

Yeah but surely that is their model

Do what celtic do

Sell a van dijk,  edouard,  Tierney every year 

The problem they and celtic have is wanting to be champions league clubs, like those in England but they don't have the TV money English clubs have 

I've not looked at Celtics accounts, but would think that as they've been successful over a number of years, they have a bit more in the bank to cater for missing out a season or two.

SevCo's accounts definitely appear to be unsustainable unless the get a good European run or can start selling players.

Surely the model for the last 9 years has been a gamble and it can't be sustainable long term

Link to comment
18 minutes ago, Watson Oh The Bar! Scanlon Yes! said:

There’s huge pressure on those two to access champions league cash that’s for sure given the massive difference in tv income.

celtic budget much more conservatively, sometimes to the consternation of their fans and stakeholders, generally budgeting for final place in the Europa league and the comparative crumbs that leaves vs champions league. 

that has left celtic in a decent position financially, with net current liabilities of c£5m in June last year.

rangers by comparison had to gamble to stop 10 in a row. They’ve done that and achieved what they needed to do in the short term, but it leaves them in a position where they need to roll some sixes for the next 3-4 years.

the other answer is fresh equity.

This has been a lovely exchange 

Plenty others should take note

Have a good evening 

Link to comment
18 minutes ago, afc1903mad said:

I've not looked at Celtics accounts, but would think that as they've been successful over a number of years, they have a bit more in the bank to cater for missing out a season or two.

SevCo's accounts definitely appear to be unsustainable unless the get a good European run or can start selling players.

Surely the model for the last 9 years has been a gamble and it can't be sustainable long term

Is it that you cant, or won't listen

We have went over this already

Are you lonely ?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...