Calvin Ramsay

[Parklife]

15 minutes ago, Dave Bus said:

yeh 5 million should be the fee at least. remember when we set the McKenna price tag at 10 million then rejected 6.5, where's that level of balls gone?

No we didn't. 

Anyway, let's suppose you're right and we rejected £6.5 million for McKenna. Given the fact we ended up with closer to £3.5 million for him, surely rejecting £6.5 million for really, REALLY fucking stupid? 

I am starting to see why @Millertime gets to exasperated. 

[Matt Armstrong's Dog]

3 hours ago, Tord31 said:

Nico Gibson Williams is offski. Fulham or something

Good to hear Nico is still playing football.

100% goals to games ratio for Aberdeen. Can't think of any other player who has had that accolade in competitive games.?

[Tord31]

34 minutes ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said:

Good to hear Nico is still playing football.

100% goals to games ratio for Aberdeen. Can't think of any other player who has had that accolade in competitive games.?

He scored a goal? Cant remember that

[Dandyesque]

On 6/6/2022 at 9:31 AM, DoonTheLine said:

The guy who tweeted this has less followers than me on Twitter yet everyone is posting it and discussing it as gospel ?

I'm not on Twitter, just heard the rumour. I'd have no way know of knowing which sad act had the most followers. 

[RUL]

Sooner he leaves the better. It’s becoming boring. 5m 

[paddy]

30 minutes ago, Tord31 said:

He scored a goal? Cant remember that

Wasn't he shit hot as a youth - remember he made 1 cameo appearance on last game of season. Never scored a senior goal for us.  

[Matt Armstrong's Dog]

39 minutes ago, Tord31 said:

He scored a goal? Cant remember that

Against St. Mirren in the final game of season 2009/10, if I remember correctly. 

He was released soon after.

Edit: Originally it was credited to Nico Gibson, but note Lee Mair officially did the needful (o.g.). 

[Hoofball]

5 hours ago, Sooper-hanz said:

We will not get £6M for him. He's nowhere near the level of TAA's back up Neco Williams either so cant see much game time at all for him. Loaned out probably .

With Williams off what may help Ramsay is the five sub rule coming in next season. Klopp may well take TAA off with 15-20 minutes to go if the game has been won and also play Ramsay in Carabao and FA cup games

[Medw1311]

8 minutes ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said:

Against St. Mirren in the final game of season 2009/10, if I remember correctly. 

He was released soon after.

That was the only game he played for us but he never scored.

Our goal in that game was a Lee Mair OG from a deflection from a Mackie shot.

[redone]

3 hours ago, slippers said:

Sky reporting that we will only accept an offer way above our 3m record fee. 4m isn't way above 3m in my opinion. Hopefully get at least 5m guaranteed. 

Sky now reporting that slippers from the Hat has released a statement that 4m isn't way above 3m , but 5m minimum,  is .

[Matt Armstrong's Dog]

2 minutes ago, Medw1311 said:

That was the only game he played for us but he never scored.

Our goal in that game was a Lee Mair OG from a deflection from a Mackie shot.

Good shout min. I remember Nico Gibson being credited with it initially but, as you quite rightly say, it was Mr. Kruger who deflected it in.

[Big Hat Logan]

This seems to be going on for an awful long time. Club being too greedy with transfer fee?

[redone]

3 minutes ago, Big Hat Logan said:

This seems to be going on for an awful long time. Club being too greedy with transfer fee?

Maybe we're trying to negotiate a deal that includes us getting him back on loan. 

Would that be "exciting" enough for the fans that are hellbent on holding Goodwin to account ?

 

[Dave Bus]

4 minutes ago, Big Hat Logan said:

This seems to be going on for an awful long time. Club being too greedy with transfer fee?

Too greedy? Liverpool are the one with the effective blank cheque, they’re scrimping, want your man - pay up.

[Matt Armstrong's Dog]

29 minutes ago, Dave Bus said:

Too greedy? Liverpool are the one with the effective blank cheque, they’re scrimping, want your man - pay up.

Correct. Considering this is the same club that bought that big lump of an impostor of a defender Virgil Van Dijk for £75 million, I'm sure they can pay the market value or what our club value Calvin Ramsay at, if they have any ounce of morality.

[redone]

2 minutes ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said:

Correct. Considering this is the same club that bought that big lump of an impostor of a defender Virgil Van Dijk for £75 million, I'm sure they can pay the market value or what our club value Calvin Ramsay at, if they have morality.

??  Nurse !!

[Durrant Dived]

1 hour ago, Dave Bus said:

Too greedy? Liverpool are the one with the effective blank cheque, they’re scrimping, want your man - pay up.

Exactly. If those fuckers want him it should be on our terms. 5m + add ons or poke it.

[Big Hat Logan]

1 hour ago, Dave Bus said:

Too greedy? Liverpool are the one with the effective blank cheque, they’re scrimping, want your man - pay up.

How do they have a blank cheque? Do they not have other players to sign or wages to pay? First team players that need to be bought to cover players leaving? 

1 hour ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said:

Correct. Considering this is the same club that bought that big lump of an impostor of a defender Virgil Van Dijk for £75 million, I'm sure they can pay the market value or what our club value Calvin Ramsay at, if they have any ounce of morality.

Ok m8

[slippers]

1 hour ago, redone said:

Sky now reporting that slippers from the Hat has released a statement that 4m isn't way above 3m , but 5m minimum,  is .

Haha! Feel like 4m isnt that much more than 3 was my point. 

[Matt Armstrong's Dog]

21 minutes ago, Big Hat Logan said:

How do they have a blank cheque? Do they not have other players to sign or wages to pay? First team players that need to be bought to cover players leaving? 

Ok m8

I am not making relative comparisons between the two players as one was allegedly at the peak of his powers at Southampton prior to the most ludicrous transfer of all-time and young Ramsay has only just over a season of playing at first team level.

My point being is that they have frequently exhibited their perceived wealth by purchasing players way above their true value, therefore, if reports are to be believed, £4 million for Ramsay is fuck all to them and arguably way below today's market value for the lad. 

[G31DON]

33 minutes ago, slippers said:

Haha! Feel like 4m isnt that much more than 3 was my point. 

4 is 1 more than 3. Hope this helps. 

[Big Hat Logan]

34 minutes ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said:

I am not making relative comparisons between the two players as one was allegedly at the peak of his powers at Southampton prior to the most ludicrous transfer of all-time and young Ramsay has only just over a season of playing at first team level.

My point being is that they have frequently exhibited their perceived wealth by purchasing players way above their true value, therefore, if reports are to be believed, £4 million for Ramsay is fuck all to them and arguably way below today's market value for the lad. 

Van Dijk is one of the best defenders in world football. To put it into perspective, Man Utd paid more for Harry Maguire.

[Dave Bus]

1 hour ago, Big Hat Logan said:

How do they have a blank cheque? Do they not have other players to sign or wages to pay? First team players that need to be bought to cover players leaving? 

Ok m8

because their turnover is £500 million, that smells like a blank cheque to me. Ramsay would be 1% of their turnover 

[Big Hat Logan]

10 minutes ago, Dave Bus said:

because their turnover is £500 million, that smells like a blank cheque to me. Ramsay would be 1% of their turnover 

Yes, that whole £500million is just sitting waiting for them to buy Calvin Ramsay ??‍♂️

[Matt Armstrong's Dog]

24 minutes ago, Big Hat Logan said:

Van Dijk is one of the best defenders in world football. To put it into perspective, Man Utd paid more for Harry Maguire.

Put it into perspective, van Dijk couldn't lace Willie Miller's boots min. 

[Big Hat Logan]

7 minutes ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said:

Put it into perspective, van Dijk couldn't lace Willie Miller's boots min. 

Oh who cares, it’s not the 80’s anymore.

[fine-n-dandy]

6 hours ago, slippers said:

Sky reporting that we will only accept an offer way above our 3m record fee. 4m isn't way above 3m in my opinion. Hopefully get at least 5m guaranteed. 

It’s roughly 33.3333333333333333333% more.

 

That’s quite a lot

 

 

£5m would be roughly BOTH our two record fees combined ?

[Matt Armstrong's Dog]

1 minute ago, Big Hat Logan said:

Oh who cares, it’s not the 80’s anymore.

Completely baseless point.

Simply saying, he is well down the order of distinguished central defenders who have played the game professionally. Miller was well above his level. End of.

The mainstream media, and their willing lapdogs, have so easily brainwashed the weak and meek into believing that Hollish lump is a "world class" defender. A sad cultural representation of our nation.

Individualism is below conformity unfortunately.

[fine-n-dandy]

14 minutes ago, Big Hat Logan said:

Oh who cares, it’s not the 80’s anymore.

It’s not yesterday anymore & it’s not tomorrow yet either.

In fact, it is now now but the ‘now’ when you wrote the above post is past now, so your post is irrelevant now & nobody cares about it whilst this post is relevant every time you care to read it

[shut up meg]

3 hours ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said:

Correct. Considering this is the same club that bought that big lump of an impostor of a defender Virgil Van Dijk for £75 million, I'm sure they can pay the market value or what our club value Calvin Ramsay at, if they have any ounce of morality.

It tool them 37 years to put up a plaque at their stadium remembering the 39 Italians who died at Heysel, I think that tells you enough about their morality.