don corleone Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 10 minutes ago, Poodler said: Their third goal was 100% not offside. Couldn’t be less offside. Honestly min some of the fans we have. Clutching at straws What absolute bullshit you speak. Player in an offside position interfering with play = offside. Goal 100% should not have stood. Link to comment
Byrne Baby Byrne Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 6 minutes ago, Ernie McCracken said: You've got to give the guy the season.. Why? Why? Why? Aye I dont get it to be honest. Think everyone has seen enough to know hes not the one. If you inherit a team thats been in the top 4 for 8 years running and give him money to improve them you really shouldnt be 9th in February. Its just a shame the whole structure of the club now looks a mess. We looked sorted for the long term 5 years ago. Link to comment
Poodler Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 Bates should’ve been looking where he was going/ in a better position 1 Link to comment
Guest findlay_1903 Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 12 minutes ago, Ernie McCracken said: Sorry but that is nonsense. Whether or not we sack the next manager within a year will depend entirely on results, performances and if we can see that progress is being made. Sacking Glass now, shouldn't affect that. You've got to give the guy the season.. Why? Why? Why? Win the next 3 games and would look ridiculous to sack him, it’s not impossible we still salvage a half decent season. Unlikely I agree, but I’m not chasing him out just yet! COYR Link to comment
Poodler Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 14 minutes ago, don corleone said: What absolute bullshit you speak. Player in an offside position interfering with play = offside. Goal 100% should not have stood. Would you rather it wasn’t a goal and rangers were top? Link to comment
Don_Corleone Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 11 hours ago, Bamber said: being logical cormack will be in country in a week or so at tjhe latests so nothinging is happening this week Ferguson game is 26th nothing is getting in the way of that after those 4 games we could be 4th or 10th 4th going nowhere 10th going At least got till the end of february i reckon Is there a particular reason the Fergie homecoming thing is on that exact date? I'm wondering if over the next couple weeks they might look for some kind of excuse to move it until later in the season. It would be embarrassing to do it if we've sacked our manager a week or two before, or if we sack him the day after. Link to comment
Guest milne_afc Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 36 minutes ago, Dandiesmin68 said: Yes it was, there was obstruction on bates as well as ferguson. Fitiver. Well beaten and deservedly 9th in the table. Tinpot wankers. Link to comment
Don_Corleone Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 1 hour ago, findlay_1903 said: I’m willing to give the guy the season, as long as it’s not seriously threatening our premier league status. Saturday is pivotal though, a drubbing to the steelmen will test patience. What's the point though? Why bother giving him the rest of the season? Things are not suddenly going to all click into place towards the end of the season - there's no signs of progress whatsoever. Better ditching him and giving someone new a bit of the season to assess the players and try and stamp his mark on the team. I know that didn't work out well last time but it was 100% the best thing to do with McInnes - the problem is we brought in the wrong replacement. It's 100% the right thing to do with Glass, but can't afford to make a mess of the next appointment. Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 I take your point and largely agree. But that’s exactly the prawcess that gave us Glass. (and yes I know the prawcess was bollocks) Link to comment
Guest milne_afc Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 26 minutes ago, don corleone said: What absolute bullshit you speak. Player in an offside position interfering with play = offside. Goal 100% should not have stood. Wasn’t offside though, sonny Jim Link to comment
don corleone Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 15 minutes ago, Poodler said: Would you rather it wasn’t a goal and rangers were top? No. I'd rather it wasn't a goal and we hadn't lost. Link to comment
Don_Corleone Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 7 minutes ago, strachanmcgheegoal said: I take your point and largely agree. But that’s exactly the prawcess that gave us Glass. (and yes I know the prawcess was bollocks) There is never a bad time to ditch a manager if you can bring in a better one. That sometimes carries a risk - but I think on this occasion it's a fairly safe bet that we should be able to bring in someone better than Glass. Link to comment
don corleone Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 5 minutes ago, milne_afc said: Wasn’t offside though, sonny Jim No, it wasn't given. Doesn't change the fact that it should have been. Link to comment
Broken_Glass Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 58 minutes ago, findlay_1903 said: He was relatively successful and a huge amount will make him the benchmark. If that happens, you’ll be looking for a manager every 2 years or so in my opinion. I would suggest your opinion is wrong. That squad is more than decent enough to be 3rd - easily. Glass has played woefully bad football and clueless with it. Everyone know how Celtic would start last night - Glass didn't. I keep going back to his "high pressing" full backs. Took him over 10 games to realise that it didn't work and a simple diagonal ball over the top split and exposed our centre half's. Every bloody time. Glass couldn't see it or refused to, blindly hoping it would come good. Amateur management. His persistent shoehorning of Ojo. His dreadful signings, his usual excuses. Out of his depth. And for those who want to say the second half performance was "superb" lets take a leaf out of our chairman's book and look at the overall stats! Even when some think we were "brilliant and deserving of a point" a proper football team found the extra goal. Something Glass is incapable of delivering. 9th = embarrassing and should be sacked. Cannot believe the apathy amongst our support that there has been no demonstrations yet. Link to comment
don corleone Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 I find it quite astounding the amount of so called Aberdeen supporters on here who are happy to see us lose and get dragged into a relegation scrap, so long as it keeps the tribute act off the top. I personally couldn’t give two fucks about any other club. Some of you need to wise the fuck up and have a serious word with yourselves. 3 Link to comment
Guest Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 30 minutes ago, milne_afc said: Fitiver. Well beaten and deservedly 9th in the table. Tinpot wankers. That's the spirit ? Link to comment
Parklife Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 20 minutes ago, milne_afc said: Wasn’t offside though, sonny Jim It was. Abada was offside and interfering with an opponent. I do appreciate your just trolling though, so fuck knows why I'm fucking replying. 1 Link to comment
caledonia Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 We need to start complaining about the refs as it seems to be allowed now. Link to comment
thurso Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 4 hours ago, Millertime said: He didn't last 90 mins AGAIN ??. What’s that got to do with anything Link to comment
thurso Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 2 hours ago, Ten Caat said: Ramsay switched off at the first goal. He just presumed Woods was dealing with it which a defender should never do. 75% Woods to blame, 25% Ramsay Third goal I had changed from Red TV commentary to Radio Shortbread. The pundits all seemed to agree it wasn't offside but did all agree that Bates was fouled which is why they thought we were complaining so bitterly to the linesman and Gollum when it wasn't awarded I’d say it was more 90% woods 10% Ramsay’s fault. If Ramsay went for that ball bring right footed facing his own goal he would of been more liable to score an own goal. Woods should of came for the ball it was a floated ball inside the 6 yard box not as if he didn’t have time to see it. I could be wrong but their third goal was the same as one of the ones that var ruled out during the Man Utd game so shouldn’t of been given last night. Scorer wasn’t offside but guy blocking the defender was. Link to comment
thurso Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Poodler said: Their third goal was 100% not offside. Couldn’t be less offside. Honestly min some of the fans we have. Clutching at straws should have cashed in on Ramsey. Like Fergo. Peaked now in regression. It’s the Aberdeen way. must be an awful environment to be in just now See above on why it shouldn’t of been given Link to comment
Guest milne_afc Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 31 minutes ago, Parklife said: It was. Abada was offside and interfering with an opponent. I do appreciate your just trolling though, so fuck knows why I'm fucking replying. Not trolling Parkie. From memory, McRorie was playing them on. Maybe I’ve got that wrong but it’s how I remember it. Have a pleasant day. Link to comment
Crossbow Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 1 minute ago, thurso said: I’d say it was more 90% woods 10% Ramsay’s fault. If Ramsay went for that ball bring right footed facing his own goal he would of been more liable to score an own goal. Woods should of came for the ball it was a floated ball inside the 6 yard box not as if he didn’t have time to see it. I could be wrong but their third goal was the same as one of the ones that var ruled for offside during the Man Utd game so shouldn’t of been given last night I thought the same and that VAR decision - I guess it comes down to whether the block altered the outcome - getting the rub of the green against the arse cheeks is never a high percentage play but I wouldn't say it was clear cut though I strongly suspect that it would go the other way if the players swapped jerseys Link to comment
thurso Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 9 minutes ago, Crossbow said: I thought the same and that VAR decision - I guess it comes down to whether the block altered the outcome - getting the rub of the green against the arse cheeks is never a high percentage play but I wouldn't say it was clear cut though I strongly suspect that it would go the other way if the players swapped jerseys I suspect even with var it wouldn’t of been overturned against those two but Iv seen two incidents like that where goals were scored and var overturned the goals in England Link to comment
Millertime Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 20 minutes ago, thurso said: ??. What’s that got to do with anything Haha everything!! When we first started butting heads on Ramsay it was because you thought he should have been in the Scotland squad I didn't, mainly because he couldn't perform for a full 90 mins He still can't and this is months down the line So, I was and am right Agreed? Link to comment
thurso Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Poodler said: Would you rather it wasn’t a goal and rangers were top? I’d rather it wasn’t a goal and a chance we could of got the draw or even won and being only 3 points of 4th with a game in hand. Personally I don’t give a fuck who’s top if we’re miles away but that’s just me I suppose 2 Link to comment
thurso Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, Millertime said: Haha everything!! When we first started butting heads on Ramsay it was because you thought he should have been in the Scotland squad I didn't, mainly because he couldn't perform for a full 90 mins He still can't and this is months down the line So, I was and am right Agreed? ? when we first butted heads on this I said ramsay should be in the squad instead of Patterson because Ramsay was playing every week Patterson wasn’t (still isn’t). Now as I said I didn’t see last nights game did ramsay get subbed because he was tired or because he wasn’t playing well Link to comment
RUL Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 6 minutes ago, thurso said: ? when we first butted heads on this I said ramsay should be in the squad instead of Patterson because Ramsay was playing every week Patterson wasn’t (still isn’t). Now as I said I didn’t see last nights game did ramsay get subbed because he was tired or because he wasn’t playing well He got subbed for tactical reasons but mainly being that he was getting the run around. Link to comment
aberdeen1970 Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 The arguments for more time are wearing a bit thin now. They don't seem to be based on anything other than blind faith which I would suggest is the absolute worst reason to give someone more time. Link to comment
aberdeen1970 Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, RUL said: He got subbed for tactical reasons but mainly being that he was getting the run around. It was both eh? Changed to a back four but as the only right back in the squad getting hooked so the centre back can move out there isnt a great advert for your first half performance. The boy is in a poor run of form. Folk just need to accept it. Pretending he's playing well when he isnt wont help him or team. 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now