In the News

[Guest milne_afc]

5 minutes ago, shut up meg said:

I'm pretty sure that they can do bank transfers though,  sounds a bit suss carrying a large amount of cash through international borders. 

Cheques only. Accepting cash, even on behalf of a charity, is out of the question.

[BrianFaePerth]

“There is no suggestion the payments were illegal”

???

 

There’s none suggesting it was legit either.

[patrick bateman]

12 hours ago, manboobs109 said:

1. You are factually incorrect on this. No matter how much you say you are not you are

 

2. You can prove this obviously. With facts and figures. With the laws in place as they are over 200k abortions took place in England and Wales in 2021. You honestly believe that more than that will take place if it were illegal(I'm not advocating that for clarity) 

You believe that over 500 illegal abortions every single day would take place?

There is no way to quantify illegal abortions.

Because you know they're illegal.

As for your 200k plus abortions figure.

Here are three medical reasons for abortion:

Ectopic pregnancy

Miscarriage that the body won't release 

Septic uterus

(All of which would result in maternal death if not treated via the procedure if aborting the foetus.)

All of which are far more common than most would think.

So your point on there can't be x number of rapes that result is abortion is bogus, you're all over the place just swinging wildly.

The number of abortions that are, as you claim, a form of contraception will be way way lower than the top end number you cling to.

 

 

[Bluto10]

be better if everyone was allowed to have local abortions, much easier that way

[Poodler]

 

[manboobs109]

46 minutes ago, patrick bateman said:

There is no way to quantify illegal abortions.

Because you know they're illegal.

As for your 200k plus abortions figure.

Here are three medical reasons for abortion:

Ectopic pregnancy

Miscarriage that the body won't release 

Septic uterus

(All of which would result in maternal death if not treated via the procedure if aborting the foetus.)

All of which are far more common than most would think.

So your point on there can't be x number of rapes that result is abortion is bogus, you're all over the place just swinging wildly.

The number of abortions that are, as you claim, a form of contraception will be way way lower than the top end number you cling to.

 

 

Yeah I must be because I didn't even make any point regarding rapes.

[CCB III]

3 hours ago, manboobs109 said:

So a new argument for abortion is that it helps keep taxes low? That's a serious point now. Kill circa 250k babies to help keep taxes down?

Some socialist you are.

That's not my argument. My argument is that you only care about the kid in it's unborn state. If we outlawed abortion in this country, there's more mouths to feed, more people to care for, that's something I'm fine with. Having more people to think about. 
 

You'd be the first to moan if your taxes went up due to the circa 200,000 new babies every year. You'd be the first to moan about the mothers not wanting them etc. 

You want to "save" the fetus in the womb, but the moment it's born you're not keen to ensure it has any real quality of life. You only care that the mother has followed your exact moral principle. 

[BrianFaePerth]

Shut the fuck up both of you @moobs @consi

[CCB III]

3 hours ago, manboobs109 said:

And you think it is OK to allow babies to be killed because of your own ideological belief.

 

Nope. I think it's ok for a woman to decide if she wants to be a mother. 
 

If we forced every woman who didn't want a kid to have a baby, you'd be the first person moaning. 
 

I reiterate, you don't care about other peoples babies. You care about women being held to your own moral standard. 
 

Once the kids are born you don't give a fuck about them, because they aren't your business. The same way what someone decides to do with something growing inside of them, is entirely their business. 

[Redforever86]

3 hours ago, For Fecks Sake said:

Try reading behind the sensational headlines and the cash was then handed to the bank and then passed onto various charities.

Lazy journalism looking to hook in simpletons.

Yeah they declare the cash when someone clypes on them or it gets noticed. Otherwise straight in the back pocket. In this day and age do you really think a billionaire would be dealing with cash if it wasn't all on the straight and narrow? 

 

And regardless if it was all legit, why the fuck did the boy (from one of the most abhorrent countries on earth who still stone women to death) get citizenship and a fucking MBE? 

[manboobs109]

2 minutes ago, CCB III said:

That's not my argument. My argument is that you only care about the kid in it's unborn state. If we outlawed abortion in this country, there's more mouths to feed, more people to care for, that's something I'm fine with. Having more people to think about. 
 

You'd be the first to moan if your taxes went up due to the circa 200,000 new babies every year. You'd be the first to moan about the mothers not wanting them etc. 

You want to "save" the fetus in the womb, but the moment it's born you're not keen to ensure it has any real quality of life. You only care that the mother has followed your exact moral principle. 

 I'm not sure where you are getting any of this TBH. You maybe need to brush up on your mind reading skills.

Complaining about the government coining it in from all the extra VAT on fuel bills and petrol means I don't want people to have a good quality of life?

This whole thing has taken a bizarre turn TBH. People are putting words in my mouth and drawing bizarre conclusions from things I've never said.

I'll just leave the whole subject now.

[CCB III]

Just now, manboobs109 said:

 I'm not sure where you are getting any of this TBH. You maybe need to brush up on your mind reading skills.

Complaining about the government coining it in from all the extra VAT on fuel bills and petrol means I don't want people to have a good quality of life?

This whole thing has taken a bizarre turn TBH. People are putting words in my mouth and drawing bizarre conclusions from things I've never said.

I'll just leave the whole subject now.

No, you've complained about tax before, and stated how actively try pay as little as possible. If there were 200,000 new babies born every year to mothers who didn't want/couldn't afford them, either these kids would grow up in poverty, or our taxes would have to go up to try give them a reasonable quality of life. But you don't like paying taxes? I'm ok with the state providing for these wee ones. It's not their fault. 
 

You're also against immigration, because the country can't afford to take in thousands or so extra people every year. That's something you've explicitly stated before. But here you are, advocating that there be 200,000 unwanted babies born every year. That doesn't make any sense. 
 

You also cried like fuck about the government coercing people into doing something with their bodies (taking the vaccine) but you'd be happy with a law that made women give birth to babies they didn't want, when they could get a relatively simple procedure to make the best decision for them and for their life. 
 

You don't make any sense. 

[For Fecks Sake]

1 hour ago, Redforever86 said:

Yeah they declare the cash when someone clypes on them or it gets noticed. Otherwise straight in the back pocket. In this day and age do you really think a billionaire would be dealing with cash if it wasn't all on the straight and narrow? 

 

And regardless if it was all legit, why the fuck did the boy (from one of the most abhorrent countries on earth who still stone women to death) get citizenship and a fucking MBE? 

You telling me you put all cash through your business aye ?

[CCB III]

TBF, hate the Royals, hate the folk who fawn over them as well. Servile simpletons. 
 

BUT, is it that surprising that after Charles said the Rwanda plan was morally wrong, there is now an old story leaked about him? 
 

Not really. Someone will have sat on that story and conveniently released it at an appropriate time. We know the government has its sycophants in the media. 

[Guest milne_afc]

It’s servile to call their appointees’Sir’ imho.

[CCB III]

2 minutes ago, milne_afc said:

It’s servile to call their appointees’Sir’ imho.

I reserve that for two people. 
 

Sir Alex and Sir Paul. The likelihood is if I ever met either of them, I'd call them sir anyway. 
 

Legends. 
 

You can make exceptions for greatness imo. 
 

Cliff Richard can fuck off though. 

[Joe pike]

3 minutes ago, CCB III said:

I reserve that for two people. 
 

Sir Alex and Sir Paul. The likelihood is if I ever met either of them, I'd call them sir anyway. 
 

Legends. 
 

You can make exceptions for greatness imo. 
 

Cliff Richard can fuck off though. 

That’s as 2 faced as saying everybody who owns multiple properties are Tory cunts.

Except your granny.

Some of your beefs are all over the place.

ps

Stop writing each post like a page in a book.

[CCB III]

3 minutes ago, Joe pike said:

That’s as 2 faced as saying everybody who owns multiple properties are Tory cunts.

Except your granny.

Some of your beefs are all over the place.

ps

Stop writing each post like a page in a book.

People who own tens and tens of properties and profit off of people needing a basic human requirement- cunts. It's like hoarding water. Hoarding food. It's fuckin rotten. 
 

A widow that needed an extra form of income having not worked for years, slightly different. There's nuance to it. I'm uncomfortable with it. But it is what it is. I have no control over it. 
 

Me choosing to refer to Paul and Alex Ferguson as sir, doesn't mean I can't despise the royal family. That's idiotic. When I worked in retail, I would call people sir, no big deal. 
 

But then again, you are total idiot. 
 

 

 

[Joe pike]

7 minutes ago, CCB III said:

People who own tens and tens of properties and profit off of people needing a basic human requirement- cunts. It's like hoarding water. Hoarding food. It's fuckin rotten. 
 

A widow that needed an extra form of income having not worked for years, slightly different. There's nuance to it. I'm uncomfortable with it. But it is what it is. I have no control over it. 
 

Me choosing to refer to Paul and Alex Ferguson as sir, doesn't mean I can't despise the royal family. That's idiotic. When I worked in retail, I would call people sir, no big deal. 
 

But then again, you are total idiot. 
 

 

 

You’re at it again.I never mentioned the Royal Family.

Just how you manage to make exceptions in all your arguments when it suits you.

Have a nice day Sir.

[CCB III]

3 minutes ago, Joe pike said:

You’re at it again.I never mentioned the Royal Family.

Just how you manage to make exceptions in all your arguments when it suits you.

Have a nice day Sir.

Everyone has slight contradictions in their thought. I don't think it's a major one to call Sir Paul by his title, as well as Sir Alex, but still think the royal family are a force for bad, and that their fanatics are a poison on the nation. If anything it shows my respect for those two individuals.
 

I also think there's a difference between property owners who have huge portfolios, hoarding housing when there's a housing crisis on, and a widow who, in the wake of her husbands death, invested in something that was guaranteed to give her a steady income. I'd suggest one might be considered a necessary evil, or an evil of circumstance, whilst the other is just plain greed.

 

Take it easy, champ. I can imagine reading all these words has hurt your head a bitty 
 

 

[Joe pike]

13 minutes ago, CCB III said:

Everyone has slight contradictions in their thought. I don't think it's a major one to call Sir Paul by his title, as well as Sir Alex, but still think the royal family are a force for bad, and that their fanatics are a poison on the nation. If anything it shows my respect for those two individuals.
 

I also think there's a difference between property owners who have huge portfolios, hoarding housing when there's a housing crisis on, and a widow who, in the wake of her husbands death, invested in something that was guaranteed to give her a steady income. I'd suggest one might be considered a necessary evil, or an evil of circumstance, whilst the other is just plain greed.

 

Take it easy, champ. I can imagine reading all these words has hurt your head a bitty 
 

 

Stopped reading your posts on abortions ages ago.I’ve managed to read War and Peace in the meantime.

It’s shorter.

 

[Bluto10]

3 hours ago, Poodler said:

 

leave anything for us?

[Ke1t]

Let's be real for a second.

Abortion should be MANDATORY in any circumstance where one or both of the partners have an IQ under 3 digits.

Does anyone disagree with that?

[Guest milne_afc]

2 minutes ago, Ke1t said:

Abortion should be MANDATORY

Agree with this. In some cases it should be applied retrospectively.

[Ke1t]

3 minutes ago, milne_afc said:

Agree with this. In some cases it should be applied retrospectively.

I apply for the position of Retospective Abortionmeister General.

Admin, I'm going to pm you shortly with a list of usernames I'll need ip addresses for.

[Redforever86]

1 hour ago, For Fecks Sake said:

You telling me you put all cash through your business aye ?

No cunt pays in cash these days. Which just highlights my previous points. 

 

Maybe I shouldn't be declaring any income to Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs considering one son is a crooked cunt and the other a crooked nonce. 

[CCB III]

https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/26/illinois-mary-miller-roe-wade-abortion-verdict-victory-for-white-life-trump
 

Quite something. 
 

I mean, we already knew trump and his supporters were a bunch of white supremacists, but now they feel like they can say it out in the open. 
 

"A victory for white life." 
 

@Ke1t hope you're ready for civil war 
 

 

[Ke1t]

4 minutes ago, CCB III said:

https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/26/illinois-mary-miller-roe-wade-abortion-verdict-victory-for-white-life-trump
 

Quite something. 
 

I mean, we already knew trump and his supporters were a bunch of white supremacists, but now they feel like they can say it out in the open. 
 

"A victory for white life." 
 

@Ke1t hope you're ready for civil war 
 

 

The Right has been open about their bigotry, racism, misogyny, xenophobia, fascism, authoritarianism, and militancy for about 6 years now.

For the most part they're fatties in the basement. But they're a threat that the Feds are prepared for, at this point.

People keep saying Civil War, but the truth is there's no mechanism for a civil war. Just disparate groups of sub intelligent  Right Wingers who would be dealt with in a week.

[CCB III]

Just now, Ke1t said:

The Right has been open about their bigotry, racism, misogyny, xenophobia, fascism, authoritarianism, and militancy for about 6 years now.

For the most part they're fatties in the basement. But they're a threat that the Feds are prepared for, at this point.

People keep saying Civil War, but the truth is there's no mechanism for a civil war. Just disparate groups of sub intelligent  Right Wingers who would be dealt with in a week.

I'd say a heavily armed proletariat is a decent mechanism for a civil war. 
 

These cunts hate everyone that's different to them. But unfortunately, the cunts that are different to them, are less likely to be armed. 
 

If I was American I'd own a gun. It's only a matter of time before these MAGA freaks kick off and try and "traditionalise" the nation. 
 

It'll be gay rights from the Supreme Court yet. Fuck me a Republican yesterday was asking for the repeal of segregation laws. 
 

They are emboldened by this shit. Something bad is brewing, like you say, 6 years or so in the making 

[For Fecks Sake]

48 minutes ago, CCB III said:

People who own tens and tens of properties and profit off of people needing a basic human requirement- cunts. It's like hoarding water. Hoarding food. It's fuckin rotten.

A widow that needed an extra form of income having not worked for years, slightly different. There's nuance to it. I'm uncomfortable with it. But it is what it is. I have no control over it.

Me choosing to refer to Paul and Alex Ferguson as sir, doesn't mean I can't despise the royal family. That's idiotic. When I worked in retail, I would call people sir, no big deal.

But then again, you are total idiot.

You do love tarring everyone with the same brush while pointing to the extremes when it comes to your jealously of things!

If it's not using examples of companies that turnover "billions", folk who own "tens and tens" of properties or folk who have done good and are "selfish millionaires"! Reality is most companies don't turnover anything near that, most folk who own more than 1 property may only have a second home or a few and the vast majority of people who do well for themselves are nowhere near being a millionaire and are probably decent folk.

If someone branded everyone unemployed as minky scroungers I am sure you would be on here outraged defending one and all, so don't be surprised if others do the same to you.