In the News

[manboobs109]

Just now, CCB III said:

I didn't think it was "dreadfully unfair." Putting words in my mouth. 
 

I said it's interesting the first thing they pick up on is that the winner was trans. Not the fact they were an adult. Not the fact that other adults were oddly competing in the same tournament. 

 

Why aren't folk raging a post pubescent woman is beating pre pubescent kids to Olympic medals? How's that fair? One has went through puberty, will have greater benefit because of it, the other is either going through it, or hasn't had it yet? Seems unfair. 

It's a competition for women at the Olympics. The kids are the exception.

Seems obvious tbh.

[manboobs109]

2 minutes ago, CCB III said:

Is a woman the same as a child? Yeah?

So you want child competitors banned from the Olympics?

Different point I think but might be valid.

[manboobs109]

4 minutes ago, CCB III said:

I think children should maybe compete against other children! 
 

 

They do but some who excel compete at the adult Olympics.

I don't get your problem with that.

[CCB III]

2 minutes ago, manboobs109 said:

They do but some who excel compete at the adult Olympics.

I don't get your problem with that.

They are going up against women who are biologically superior to them. 
 

 

[manboobs109]

Just now, CCB III said:

They are going up against women who are biologically superior to them. 
 

 

You seem to be struggling with this. The children are joining in the WOMEN'S competitions. If the women were joining the CHILDREN'S competition you might have a point.

[Simply Red]

9 minutes ago, CCB III said:

Is a woman the same as a child? Yeah?

Dwarf woman is (other than the tits and hairy duff)

Would you fuck a dwarf? 

[CCB III]

3 minutes ago, manboobs109 said:

You seem to be struggling with this. The children are joining in the WOMEN'S competitions. If the women were joining the CHILDREN'S competition you might have a point.

Yep. 

And they aren't winning? How's it fair? What chance have they got?

 

Its almost as if having a biological advantage won't always result in you winning the competition. Haha. 

[manboobs109]

2 minutes ago, CCB III said:

Yep. 

And they aren't winning? How's it fair? What chance have they got?

You're obviously trying to do a "thing"

I'll leave you to it.

[manboobs109]

Just now, CCB III said:

It's almost like a biological advantage doesn't guarantee anything. 
 

Not all the time, anyway. 
 

Something to chew on.  

Obviously skill, dedication and hard work come into it.

All things being equal biological advantage will swing it.

Something to chew on.

[CCB III]

1 minute ago, manboobs109 said:

You're obviously trying to do a "thing"

I'll leave you to it.

It's almost like a biological advantage doesn't guarantee anything. 
 

Not all the time, anyway. 
 

Something to chew on.  

[Guest Grays Babylon 1875]

20 years.  Nonce bastard.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-61970358

[CCB III]

3 minutes ago, manboobs109 said:

Obviously skill, dedication and hard work come into it.

All things being equal biological advantage will swing it.

Something to chew on.

But not all things will be equal. Not even in a biological sense. 

Michael Phelps had a freakish lung capacity. Everyone trained just as hard as him, but his genetics meant he was an anomaly. It wasn't really fair the other athletes had to compete v him. 
 

The rules for who can/can't compete are also arbitrary nonsense. For example, they banned Semenya from competing because her testosterone levels were too high. 
 

She was born a woman. Her genetics just were what they were. She should be able to compete, the same was Phelps was. 
 

It's a grey area. 

[maryhilldon]

44 minutes ago, CCB III said:

 

The fact that they are trans is what Maryhilldumbo and StinkyBoBrianFaePoo decided to focus on. 
 

Nope, that's what the article in the paper focused on. That was the whole point of the article. I don't make the news.

[patrick bateman]

For someone who I'm guessing would hate to be called a misogynist, you sure hold some opinions in that direction consi old lad.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[CCB III]

1 minute ago, maryhilldon said:

I didn't cherry pick the story, someone else posted a link.

And you jumped on it with your usual

 

 

[CCB III]

Just now, NEM said:

You can call it whatever nasty names you like, doesn’t alter the fact it’s the truth. He is actually a bloke 

"I don't need to get the view from the other side."

 

Why would I engage with you on this topic after that? 
 

Pure ignorance 

[maryhilldon]

27 minutes ago, CCB III said:

 

Im saying Bri and MHD are cunts for cherrypicking a story, and using it to shit on trans folk. 
 

I didn't cherry pick the story, someone else posted a link.

[CCB III]

4 minutes ago, patrick bateman said:

For someone who I'm guessing would hate to be called a misogynist, you sure hold some opinions in that direction consi old lad.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where exactly? 

[manboobs109]

7 minutes ago, CCB III said:

But not all things will be equal. Not even in a biological sense. 

Michael Phelps had a freakish lung capacity. Everyone trained just as hard as him, but his genetics meant he was an anomaly. It wasn't really fair the other athletes had to compete v him. 
 

The rules for who can/can't compete are also arbitrary nonsense. For example, they banned Semenya from competing because her testosterone levels were too high. 
 

She was born a woman. Her genetics just were what they were. She should be able to compete, the same was Phelps was. 
 

It's a grey area. 

It's not. It's been perfectly simple until very recently.

[NEM]

2 hours ago, CCB III said:

"Actually a bloke" 

More nasty, bigoted rubbish. 
 

I thought ganja smokers were meant to be accepting? Chilled out?

 

Cant say I've met many reefer heads so tightly wound about other peoples identities. 

You can call it whatever nasty names you like, doesn’t alter the fact it’s the truth. He is actually a bloke 

[CCB III]

2 minutes ago, manboobs109 said:

It's not. It's been perfectly simple until very recently.

So why was Semenyo banned? Despite being born a woman, competing with other women? No evidence of illegal drugs either?

[NEM]

37 minutes ago, CCB III said:

I didn't think it was "dreadfully unfair." Putting words in my mouth. 
 

I said it's interesting the first thing they pick up on is that the winner was trans. Not the fact they were an adult. Not the fact that other adults were oddly competing in the same tournament. 

 

Why aren't folk raging a post pubescent woman is beating pre pubescent kids to Olympic medals? How's that fair? One has went through puberty, will have greater benefit because of it, the other is either going through it, or hasn't had it yet? Seems unfair. 

Since when have there been age limits on Olympic events?

[manboobs109]

4 minutes ago, CCB III said:

So why was Semenyo banned? Despite being born a woman, competing with other women? No evidence of illegal drugs either?

You're asking the wrong person Consi.

[sheepcrooky]

What a read. Keep it up chaps (and chapesses) (and any transgenders). 
 

Marvellous reading. 

[CCB III]

Just now, NEM said:

Since when have there been age limits on Olympic events?

Why isn't there? 
 

Is it fair that prepubescent kids play v adults? One will have an advantage over the other? 
 

Or is it that not all sports follow the same guidelines and formula for such things. 
 

It's not as simple as, genetically superior= victor. 
 

 

[NEM]

10 minutes ago, CCB III said:

"I don't need to get the view from the other side."

 

Why would I engage with you on this topic after that? 
 

Pure ignorance 

If the other side is demonstrable nonsense aye. 
 

Don’t engage with me if you like, makes zero odds to me. You make a cunt of yourself with plenty other posters 

[NEM]

2 minutes ago, CCB III said:

Why isn't there? 
 

Is it fair that prepubescent kids play v adults? One will have an advantage over the other? 
 

Or is it that not all sports follow the same guidelines and formula for such things. 
 

It's not as simple as, genetically superior= victor. 
 

 

Are you fishing here? Genuinely?

[CCB III]

Just now, NEM said:

Are you fishing here? Genuinely?

Not even a little bit. 
 

Explained my point to Moobs. Cba repeating it. 

[CCB III]

3 minutes ago, NEM said:

If the other side is demonstrable nonsense aye. 
 

Don’t engage with me if you like, makes zero odds to me. You make a cunt of yourself with plenty other posters 

"Demonstrable nonsense to me"

 

Is what you should say. Plenty other people more open/understanding to it. Even biologists and yes you guessed it, scientists! 
 

Im sure you'll know more than them with your extensive internet research. 

[NEM]

Just now, CCB III said:

"Demonstrable nonsense to me"

 

Is what you should say. Plenty other people more open/understanding to it. Even biologists and yes you guessed it, scientists! 
 

Im sure you'll know more than them with your extensive internet research. 

No demonstrable nonsense to anyone with a functioning brain. What is a woman? A question the trans loonies can’t answer. Science > feelings.

 

End of discussion.