In the News

[tutankamun 380]

Maybe we need to agree to disagree?

You’re a Commie living in the USA.

I’m not a Commie living in the people’s republic of Scotland

[Ke1t 4,440]

1 minute ago, tutankamun said:

• Judged by society as I said. No need for the law.
• Ill give you credit Kelt, you are relentless.
• I assume it’s earlier where you are…

• Judged by society is kinda meaningless, though, surely? I mean... what are the actual repercussions of non-legal judgement? It's not even a slap on the wrist. Is it like blocking on Facebook or Twitter? 
• I'm just intrigued at the idea that anyone would want the guy at the top to suffer no consequences for the actions of his underlings. I mean, that's how the real world usually works, but it's interesting to me to actually see someone express that as a desired outcome. 
• Like 9pm now. Just has some Injin food and beers. 

Speaking of condescending, though, have you really found my stance so hilarious that you laughed at the majority of my responses? 

 

[tutankamun 380]

1 minute ago, Ke1t said:

• Judged by society is kinda meaningless, though, surely? I mean... what are the actual repercussions of non-legal judgement? It's not even a slap on the wrist. Is it like blocking on Facebook or Twitter? 
• I'm just intrigued at the idea that anyone would want the guy at the top to suffer no consequences for the actions of his underlings. I mean, that's how the real world usually works, but it's interesting to me to actually see someone express that as a desired outcome. 
• Like 9pm now. Just has some Injin food and beers. 

Speaking of condescending, though, have you really found my stance so hilarious that you laughed at the majority of my responses? 

 

Yes

[Ke1t 4,440]

Just now, tutankamun said:

Maybe we need to agree to disagree?

You’re a Commie living in the USA.

I’m not a Commie living in the people’s republic of Scotland

I'm a Commie in intent, a Capitalist in Practice. 

If I could wave a magic wand, though, we'd all be living in decentralised, self-governing, people's anarchistic communes. 

Now that's probably worth laughing at. 

 

[Ke1t 4,440]

1 minute ago, tutankamun said:

Yes

Well, that's disappointing on a number of levels.  

[tutankamun 380]

Being judged by society is not meaningless.

Only Yanks need to be financially compensated for being offended.

[tutankamun 380]

1 minute ago, Ke1t said:

Well, that's disappointing on a number of levels.  

It’s obviously more complicated than that but it’s late.

[tutankamun 380]

2 minutes ago, Ke1t said:

I'm a Commie in intent, a Capitalist in Practice. 

If I could wave a magic wand, though, we'd all be living in decentralised, self-governing, people's anarchistic communes. 

Now that's probably worth laughing at. 

 

I laughed. Utopia

’Champagne Socialist’ springs to mind.

 

[Ke1t 4,440]

1 minute ago, tutankamun said:

I laughed. Utopia

’Champagne Socialist’ springs to mind.

 

'Pragmatic working man' is more accurate. 

 

[tutankamun 380]

Just now, Ke1t said:

'Pragmatic working man' is more accurate. 

 

Most of us are that I think.

My mum & dad were/are hippies, I love the idea of it but ultimately feels a bit ‘pie in the sky’. Depressing really.

[Dal Riata Don 86]

Up to $50 Million now.

Alex Jones must pay $50 Mill

A clear sign to the general public that this sort of thing will not be tolerated indefinitely.  

[tutankamun 380]

1 minute ago, Dal Riata Don said:

Up to $50 Million now.

Alex Jones must pay $50 Mill

A clear sign to the general public that this sort of thing will not be tolerated indefinitely.  

“This sort of thing” FFS

A clear sign to the proles that freedom of speech will not be tolerated.

Wake the fuck up man.

[maryhilldon 1,810]

2 hours ago, Ke1t said:

To my knowledge Hitler didn't gas a single Jew. 

 

It's disgusting how his reputation has been tarnished over the years.

[Dal Riata Don 86]

11 minutes ago, tutankamun said:

“This sort of thing” FFS

A clear sign to the proles that freedom of speech will not be tolerated.

Wake the fuck up man.

But my freedom stops where yours begins.

This wasn't a case of someone having a different opinion based on their own life experience or outlook.

This was a situation where a man with the financial resources to make a proper investigation chose instead, to publicize deliberate lies for his own financial gain.

Well, in my view, he overstepped the boundaries of his own freedom and encroached upon the rights of others, leading to a significant detriment to their lives, as has just been upheld.

Is Jones still free to think these thoughts? Yes. Is he free to express his views to whomever he may have dinner with tomorrow? Yes.

His freedom of speech is still intact. 

 

Edited August 6 by Dal Riata Don
Editing.

[Ke1t 4,440]

10 minutes ago, maryhilldon said:

It's disgusting how his reputation has been tarnished over the years.

Time to stop blaming him for the Holocaust, I think. 

 

[Ke1t 4,440]

17 minutes ago, tutankamun said:

“This sort of thing” FFS

A clear sign to the proles that freedom of speech will not be tolerated.

Wake the fuck up man.

But his freedom of speech is being tolerated by the government. He can go right back on the radio tomorrow and continue to lie about Sandy Hook. 

Again, this was a civil case to determine whether or not his words had caused real world harm, and they were found to have caused exactly that. 

His 1st amendment is intact. 

He might want to make better decisions going forward, or not, his choice. 

[tutankamun 380]

5 minutes ago, Ke1t said:

 

His 1st amendment is intact. 

 

For now.

[tutankamun 380]

14 minutes ago, Dal Riata Don said:

 

His freedom of speech is still intact. 

 

As long as he doesn’t express it in public

[Dal Riata Don 86]

6 minutes ago, tutankamun said:

For now.

This is reactionary, based on nothing. 

6 minutes ago, tutankamun said:

As long as he doesn’t express it in public

I think Kelt has covered this point above.

[tutankamun 380]

As I said before, I think AJ is controlled. He’s deliberately saying outlandish things in order to create controversy and discredit conspiracy theorists.

Civil case or not, the 1st amendment is always in danger.

[tutankamun 380]

11 minutes ago, Dal Riata Don said:

This is reactionary, based on nothing. 

Based on what I can see with my own eyes.

As I said, wake up.

[Dal Riata Don 86]

2 minutes ago, tutankamun said:

Based on what I can see with my own eyes.

As I said, wake up.

OK.

I will heed your warning^. 

I realise it's difficult to express sincerity online but, I will take your advice. 

[tutankamun 380]

2 minutes ago, Dal Riata Don said:

OK.

I will heed your warning^. 

I realise it's difficult to express sincerity online but, I will take your advice. 

Fair enough

[BrianFaePerth 2,674]

8 hours ago, Ke1t said:

To let you understand my position on this, here's a scenario. 

There are 3 neighbours, A, B, and C. 

Every day, for 10 years, A tells B that he's seen C looking out the window at B's kids, taking pictures and wanking over them. A further tells B than C has openly said he plans to abduct B's kids, rape them, and murder them. 

This is a complete fabrication, though, since C has done no such thing. 

After 10 years B eventually snaps, gets a shotgun, and blows C's head off in order to save his kids. 

Now this is a situation created entirely thanks to a fabrication by A. There's no other, external reason for this to have happened aside from A's egregious lies. 

Do you feel that A bears any responsibility for the subsequent killing of an innocent man?

 

 

Did this happen in New Hampshire?

[Ohjimmyjimmy 894]

Ha ha ha, been torn a new one here you Egyptian cocksmoker.

[Bad_Mobby 4,739]

9 hours ago, Ke1t said:

To let you understand my position on this, here's a scenario. 

There are 3 neighbours, A, B, and C. 

Every day, for 10 years, A tells B that he's seen C looking out the window at B's kids, taking pictures and wanking over them. A further tells B than C has openly said he plans to abduct B's kids, rape them, and murder them. 

This is a complete fabrication, though, since C has done no such thing. 

After 10 years B eventually snaps, gets a shotgun, and blows C's head off in order to save his kids. 

Now this is a situation created entirely thanks to a fabrication by A. There's no other, external reason for this to have happened aside from A's egregious lies. 

Do you feel that A bears any responsibility for the subsequent killing of an innocent man?

 

 

is A @manboobs109 neighbour? 

[Poodler 3,341]

Well looks like it’s the end of the road for young Archie’s body.

 

bit of a shame his mum couldn’t have spent more time with him but she committed to a lot of lucrative tv interviews instead. 
 

we won’t have seen the last of her 

[Beachend Bootboy 370]

Just now, Poodler said:

Well looks like it’s the end of the road for young Archie’s body.

 

bit of a shame his mum couldn’t have spent more time with him but she committed to a lot of lucrative tv interviews instead. 
 

we won’t have seen the last of her 

Bet her Go Fund Me is worth a bit now. Glory huntin' cow.  I find it difficult to have any sympathy tbh.

[Reed or deed 974]

Think this is entirely what is wrong with social media these days. 
 

Cunts using it as a platform to act hard or put forward their “opinions” on things that are absolutely fuck all to do with them.

No better than facebook attention seekers IMO

[Parklife 1,214]

15 hours ago, patrick bateman said:

 

I can't see into the future.

 

Nah, you just make up smears, you fuxking cunt.